Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
Top Class Actions readers have reported receiving checks from nine class action lawsuit settlements resolving false advertising, data breach and other allegations.
StubHub ticket fees settlement checks
StubHub customers from California are receiving checks from a class action lawsuit settlement over undisclosed ticket fees.
The settlement benefits individuals who purchased at least one ticket from StubHub in California between Sept. 1, 2015, and Sept. 1, 2019.
Plaintiffs in the class action lawsuit claim StubHub charged hidden fees on ticket purchases on its website and app. These undisclosed fees, charged at the very end of online transactions, allegedly violated California law.
StubHub agreed to pay up to $2.5 million in cash and provide $20 million in credits toward future transactions. Consumers could receive a cash payment of up to $20 or a credit of up to $133. Top Class Actions readers received cash payments of $20 and credits of $548.70.
The deadline to file a claim with the settlement was June 25, 2022.
The StubHub class action lawsuit is Susan Wang, et al. v. StubHub Inc., Case No. GCG18564120, in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco.
San Francisco medical data privacy class action rebates
Readers have received settlement checks from a San Francisco class action lawsuit regarding patient information privacy breaches.
The settlement benefits 8,884 patients of Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center whose medical records were kept by Dr. Shirley Stiver.
According to the class action lawsuit against the city and county of San Francisco and other defendants, sensitive patient information was disclosed without their written authorization. Disclosed patient data allegedly included HIV diagnoses, radiological results, consultation information, surgical notes and more.
Under the terms of the data privacy class action settlement, patients could receive a cash payment of up to $599. One Top Class Actions reader reports receiving a settlement check worth $197.
The deadline to file a claim with the settlement was Aug. 30, 2022.
The San Francisco data privacy class action lawsuit is Jane Doe, et al. vs. The City and County of San Francisco, et al., Case No. CGC-16-551618, in the San Francisco Superior Court.
Snapchat Illinois BIPA settlement checks
Snapchat users in Illinois may receive class action rebates from a settlement resolving claims that the social media platform violated BIPA.
The settlement benefits Illinois residents who used “Lenses” and “Filters” on Snapchat since Nov. 17, 2015.
Snapchat users claim that the app violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting and scanning their facial geometry without their consent. BIPA requires businesses to obtain written consent before collecting and storing biometrics such as facial geometry scans and fingerprints.
Snapchat agreed to pay $35 million to resolve the BIPA allegations. Under the terms of the settlement, users could receive an equal share of the net settlement fund. Our readers report receiving checks and PayPal payments of $16.36 each.
The deadline to file a claim with the settlement was Nov. 5, 2022.
The Snapchat BIPA class action lawsuit is Boone, et al. v. Snap Inc., Case No. 2022LA000708, in the Circuit Court of the 18th Judicial Circuit, DuPage County, Illinois.
Sara Lee pound cake false advertising class action rebates
Consumers who purchased Sara Lee pound cake may receive a settlement payment from a false advertising class action settlement.
The settlement benefits consumers who purchased Sara Lee All Butter Pound Cake products between April 27, 2017, and July 29, 2022.
According to the false advertising class action lawsuit, Sara Lee pound cake doesn’t contain “all butter” as advertised. Instead, the products contain lesser quality soybean oil and yellow food dye to mislead customers, the plaintiffs contend.
Sara Lee agreed to pay $1 million to resolve these allegations. Under the terms of the settlement, consumers could receive up to $5 without proof of purchase or up to $20 with proof of purchase. Top Class Actions readers have received $5 payments from the settlement.
The deadline to file a claim with the settlement was Oct. 11, 2022.
The Sara Lee false advertising class action lawsuit is Grayer v. Sara Lee Frozen Bakery LLC, Case No. 2022LA000002, in the 3rd Judicial Circuit of Madison County, Illinois.
Apple iPhone 4S iOS 9 settlement checks
Apple users are receiving checks from a class action settlement that resolved claims that iOS 9 slowed down certain iPhones.
The settlement benefits individuals who downloaded iOS 9 onto their iPhone 4S, lived in New York or New Jersey at the time they first downloaded any version of iOS 9 and whose iPhone 4S experienced a significant decline in performance as a result.
Apple users say that iOS 9 released in September 2015 slowed down their iPhone 4S devices. Plaintiffs in the class action lawsuit argued they wouldn’t have downloaded the operating system update if they knew that their device performance would be diminished.
Under the terms of the settlement, consumers could receive up to $150 per device. According to our readers, actual payments from the settlement were $48.52.
The deadline to file a claim with the settlement was Aug. 9, 2022.
The iPhone 4S iOS 9 class action lawsuit is Lerman v. Apple Inc., Case No. 15-cv-07381 (SJ) (LB), in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
Miracle-Ear TCPA class action rebates
Top Class Actions readers report receiving settlement payments from a telemarketing class action lawsuit with Miracle-Ear.
The settlement benefits individuals who received a call from HearingPro since July 1, 2016 that was placed using the Five9 or Ytel dialing system.
According to the telemarketing class action lawsuit, Miracle-Ear’s franchise HearingPro violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by calling consumers without their consent. The TCPA requires businesses to get express written consent before calling or texting consumers for telemarketing purposes.
Miracle-Ear agreed to pay $8 million to resolve the TCPA allegations. Under the terms of the settlement, consumers could receive an equal share of the net settlement fund. One reader reports a payment of $146.24.
The deadline to file a claim with the settlement was Aug. 1, 2022.
The Miracle-Ear TCPA class action lawsuit is Baldwin, et al. v. Miracle-Ear Inc., et al., Case No. 20-cv-1502, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota.
Godiva false advertising settlement checks
Godiva purchasers may receive a class action rebate from a settlement resolving claims that the chocolatier falsely advertised its chocolates are made in Belgium.
The settlement benefits individuals who purchased certain Godiva chocolate products between Jan. 31, 2015, and Oct. 26, 2021.
Godiva allegedly advertised its chocolate products as made in Belgium. In reality, the products are not made in the country, consumers claim. The false advertising allegedly deceived customers into paying a higher price for the chocolates.
Godiva agreed to pay $15 million to resolve the false advertising claims. Under the terms of the settlement, consumers could receive up to $25 with proof of purchase or up to $15 without proof of purchase. Top Class Actions readers report $15 settlement payments.
The deadline to file a claim with the settlement was Feb. 23, 2022.
The Godiva false advertising class action lawsuit is Hesse, et al. v. Godiva Chocolatier Inc., Case No. 1:19-cv-00927-AJN, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Molekule air purifiers false advertising class action rebates
Consumers who purchased Molekule air purifiers may soon receive a settlement payment from a false advertising deal.
The settlement benefits consumers who purchased the Molekule Air, Molekule Air Pro, Molekule Air Mini, the Molekule Air Mini+ or the Molekule Air Pro Rx on or before Oct. 12, 2021. In order to participate in the settlement, customers must not have agreed to the arbitration provision in Molekule’s terms and conditions.
According to the class action lawsuit, Molekule advertised its air purifiers as able to outperform HEPA filters and pass independent testing. These claims were allegedly false and intended to mislead consumers into purchasing the products.
Under the terms of the settlement, consumers could receive a cash payment and a coupon of up to $250 for the purchase of a new air purifier. Top Class Actions readers report receiving payments of $45.22 from the settlement.
The deadline to file a claim with the settlement was May 31, 2022.
The Molekule false advertising class action lawsuit is Apaliski, et al. v. Molekule Inc., Case No. 1:20-CV-01548-RGA, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.
Benecol false advertising settlement checks
Settlement payments are in the mail from a false advertising class action settlement surrounding Benecol spread.
The settlement benefits customers who purchased a Benecol spread in the United States between Jan. 1, 2008, and Dec. 31, 2011.
According to the class action lawsuit, Benecol spread — which claims to be proven to lower cholesterol — was falsely advertised as containing zero trans fat. In reality, the products allegedly use partially hydrogenated oils which contain trans fats.
Benecol manufacturers Johnson & Johnson and McNeil Nutritionals agreed to pay $2 million to resolve the false advertising class action lawsuit. Under the terms of the settlement, consumers could receive up to $20 for four purchases of Benecol spread. Readers report receiving payments of around $10.17.
The deadline to file a claim with the settlement was Feb. 25, 2022.
The Benecol false advertising class action lawsuit is Joann Martinelli, et al. v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., Case No. 2:15-CV-01733-MCE-DB, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California.
Don’t Miss Out!
Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
7 thoughts onStubHub, Apple, other class action settlement checks in the mail
ADD ME
Add me
Why do I only get checks for 4 or 5$? I pay to cash them. I walk away with 2 $. I don’t think I am liked very much and it’s done on purpose!
Well, congratulations to everyone who saved all of their receipts!
Well, congratulations to everyone who saved all of their receipts! It’s the only way to get real justice!
I do
Add me please i