Little Rock couple Julie Elson and Philip Elson filed a Mirena IUD side effect lawsuit on July 19, alleging that the contraceptive intrauterine device produced by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. led to organ damage and other issues that the company failed to make known to the Elsons or Ms. Elson’s gynecologist.
Millions of women have used Mirena since it was approved in 2000. According to the Mirena side effect lawsuit, however, these women have not been informed that the device has the potential to lead to spontaneous migration, even if it is properly seated by a gynecologist. If the IUD moves, it can lead to uterine perforation and ectopic pregnancies. The former Mirena IUD side effect allegedly happened to Julie Elson after receiving the implant in December 1, 2009. Less than one year later, her gynecologist attempted to remove the device but was unable to do so manually, requiring Elson to undergo laparoscopy surgery on July 21, 2010.
In addition, Bayer has come under fire from the FDA for marketing campaigns that alleged the Mirena IUD would improve women’s sex lives when pre-approval clinical trials indicated that some users reported a loss of libido in addition to Mirena IUD uterine perforation concerns.
The Mirena IUD Side Effects Lawsuit is Julie Elson and Philip Elson v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-00420, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas.
Obtain a Free Mirena Injury Laywer Consultation
A growing number of women and their spouses are finding out that these devices may have caused long lasting problems for them. You or someone you love may be eligible to file a product liability lawsuit against Bayer. Learn more and get a free legal review from a Mirena IUD lawsuit lawyer today. Fill out the short form at the Mirena IUD Injury Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation to start the process. Any legal success in terms of a jury award or settlement could result in damages to pay for medical bills and lost quality of life.
Updated July 31st, 2013
{loadposition content_ol-news}While the Mirena side effect lawsuit does not specifically note it, data regarding Mirena IUD spontaneous migration side effects to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) occur at a higher per capita rate than with Bayer’s oral contraceptives, which could cost the company $2 billion in product liability settlements. The couple’s Mirena IUD lawsuit lawyer did cite the firm’s failure to warn in not monitoring these events and updating product safety information.
Roundup cancer lawsuits: Updates, settlements and eligibility
April 10, 2026 | Roundup Class Action Investigations
