Laura Pennington  |  February 18, 2019

Category: Legal News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Man on a sofa with stomach painPlaintiff Jon K. is the latest patient to argue that hernia repair with mesh comes with significant consequences and side effects that were not properly disclosed to the public.

Jon says that he suffered severe injuries because of Proceed surgical mesh, also known as the Ethicon multilayered hernia mesh. He alleges that there was an unreasonable risk of adhesion formation, pain, bowel complications, hernia recurrence, infection, and dense adhesion formation with the Ethicon multi-layered hernia mesh, that it was defective, and that the manufacturers knew.

He argues that the defendants failed to disclose the high-risk profile to the medical community and possible patients, leaving them instead to suffer the consequences.

Jon says that he underwent hernia repair with mesh on Nov. 2, 2010 in Wisconsin.

Like many other patients who have taken legal action against hernia mesh manufacturers, Jon says the issues are allegedly due to the makeup of the product. For example, according to Jon’s lawsuit, the multiple layers of the Ethicon multi-layered hernia mesh increase the duration and intensity of the body’s inflammatory response to the product. This enhanced response is allegedly due to the polypropylene material used to manufacture the mesh.

The lawsuit also argues that the defendants have continued to market the hernia mesh without warning patients about the risk of severe shrinkage or necessary overlap required to prevent early hernia recurrence. The lawsuit alleges that the defendants were aware that some of the layers of the hernia mesh were ineffective at preventing polypropylene adhesions and that the multi-layered mesh could contract over a period of time.

Those individuals who have experienced problems with their hernia mesh are encouraged to report these through the FDA’s adverse event reporting system.

The FDA requests specifics about the hernia mesh such as the date of implant, the catalog number, lot number, size, manufacturer’s name, product name, date of explant, the preoperative diagnosis and mesh placement, and a description of the problem.

According to the FDA, there are several different treatment options available to people who develop hernias. These include watchful waiting, such as your surgeon keeping an eye on it and making sure that it does not get any bigger or cause problems.

Surgical options for hernia treatment include open repair or laparoscopic surgery. In open repair, the surgeon makes an incision close to the hernia in an effort to address weak tissues in the muscle. This can be done without or with surgical mesh. Laparoscopic surgery, however, requires several small incisions in the patient’s abdomen that allows surgical tools that fit into the openings to repair the hernia.

The Hernia Mesh Lawsuit is Case No. 3:19-cv-00546-FLW-DEA in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County.

Do YOU have a legal claim? Fill out the form on this page now for a free, immediate, and confidential case evaluation. The hernia mesh attorneys who work with Top Class Actions will contact you if you qualify to let you know if an individual lawsuit or class action lawsuit is best for you. [In general, hernia mesh lawsuits are filed individually by each plaintiff and are not class actions.] Hurry — statutes of limitations may apply.

Learn More

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


Get Help – It’s Free

Join a Free Hernia Mesh Class Action Lawsuit Investigation

An attorney will contact you if you qualify to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you.

PLEASE NOTE: If you want to participate in this investigation, it is imperative that you reply to the law firm if they call or email you. Failing to do so may result in you not getting signed up as a client or getting you dropped as a client.

E-mail any problems with this form to: Questions@TopClassActions.com.

  • The law firms responsible for the content of this page are:
    LegaFi Law LLC (an Arizona law firm)
    888-4-LegaFi
    legafi.com
    and
    Levin, Papantonio, Rafferty, Proctor, Buchanan, O'Brien, Barr & Mougey P.A.
    Pensacola, FL
    800-277-1193
    levinlaw.com
  • MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • We tell you about cash you can claim every week! Subscribe to our free newsletter today.
    By checking this box, I consent to receive from Top Class Actions marketing emails and/or marketing calls or text messages sent by an automatic telephone dialing system. I consent to Top Class Actions providing my phone number and email address to the lawyers or their agents sponsoring this investigation, and their co-counsel, if any, and I consent to receive marketing calls, text messages, and/or emails from those lawyers or their agents. I understand that this authorization overrides any previous registrations on a federal or state Do Not Call registry. You may opt out at any time. You can review Top Class Actions' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy here.
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
    MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.