Jaguar Land Rover has agreed to a class action lawsuit settlement to resolve claims that certain Land Rover and Range Rover vehicles are equipped with defective turbochargers that can cause engine damage.
The Land Rover turbocharger settlement benefits current and former owners or lessees of model year 2013-2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, model year 2015-2017 Land Rover Discovery Sport or model year 2013-2015 Land Rover LR2 vehicles equipped with a brazed scroll turbocharger.
According to the class action lawsuit, certain Land Rover and Range Rover vehicles were equipped with a defective turbocharger that can cause engine damage. Plaintiffs in the case say that Jaguar Land Rover knew about the turbocharger defect but failed to disclose it to consumers or pay for repairs.
Jaguar Land Rover is a luxury automotive company that sells Land Rover and Range Rover vehicles.
Jaguar Land Rover hasn’t admitted any wrongdoing but agreed to pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the turbocharger defect class action lawsuit.
Under the terms of the Land Rover settlement, class members can receive reimbursement for out-of-pocket costs related to turbocharger and engine repairs. Turbocharger replacements are eligible for up to $3,750, while engine repairs are eligible for up to $12,000. Reimbursement rates will vary depending on vehicle age and mileage.
The class action settlement also extends the Jaguar Land Rover warranty to cover turbocharger and engine repairs for up to 10 years and 100,000 miles. This warranty extension is subject to adjustments based on vehicle age and mileage.
The deadline for exclusion and objection is June 20, 2025.
The final approval hearing for the defective turbocharger settlement is scheduled for Sept. 30, 2025.
In order to receive settlement benefits, class members must submit a valid claim form by Dec. 29, 2025.
Who’s Eligible
Current and former owners and lessees of 2013-2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 2015-2017 Land Rover Discovery Sport or 2013-2015 Land Rover LR2 vehicles who purchased or leased their vehicle before Sept. 27, 2024, and whose vehicle is equipped with a brazed scroll turbocharger.
A VIN lookup tool is available on the settlement website to help determine class membership.
Potential Award
Up to $15,750 in reimbursements for turbocharger and engine repairs, as well as extended warranty coverage.
Proof of Purchase
Repair invoices, receipts, work orders, credit card statements, bank statements, etc.
Claim Form
NOTE: If you do not qualify for this settlement do NOT file a claim.
Remember: you are submitting your claim under penalty of perjury. You are also harming other eligible Class Members by submitting a fraudulent claim. If you’re unsure if you qualify, please read the FAQ section of the Settlement Administrator’s website to ensure you meet all standards (Top Class Actions is not a Settlement Administrator). If you don’t qualify for this settlement, check out our database of other open class action settlements you may be eligible for.
Claim Form Deadline
12/29/2025
Case Name
Flynn-Murphy, et al. v. Jaguar Land Rover North America LLC, et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-14464-MCA-JBC, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
Final Hearing
9/30/2025
Settlement Website
Claims Administrator
Turbocharger Settlement Administrator
1650 Arch Street, Suite 2210
Philadelphia, PA 19103
844-717-4074
Class Counsel
Christopher A. Seeger
SEEGERS WISS LLP
James E. Cecchi
CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, BRODY & AGNELLO PC
Defense Counsel
Allison M. Wuertz
Michael L. Kidney
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
- $5M University of Minnesota data breach class action settlement
- $15.35M Shields Health Group data breach settlement
- $229M Archdiocese of New Orleans sexual abuse settlement
- $8.5M Nuance Communications MOVEit data breach class action settlement
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2025 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.


4 thoughts onJaguar Land Rover defective turbocharger class action settlement
I deserve to be included in this. I purchased a 2020 Jaguar F-Pace S in April 2024. In Oct of 2024 until Dec 2024 vehicle was in shop having issues with water pump. I got vehicle back for 3 weeks and then on my way home from work vehicle started smoking and cabin smelled of gas. I had it towed back to shop. From Jan 2025-March 2025 shop attempted to repairs vehicle but after another 3 month I got a call stating current shop could not fix vehicle and had it towed to manufacture (Jaguar of LA) from March 2025-Aug 2025 I fought with Jaguar and vehicle warranty company Fidelity to have vehicle repaired. Fidelity wanted a complete engine tear down to identify cause of vehicles diagnosed catastrophic engine failure. Fidelity requested it but would pay for it and Jaguar wanted $4,000 just to tear down engine. I had to pay this just to determine cause of engine failure. After months of intense dealings with all parties. My vehicle needed the turbo drive train system repaired or replaced and also needed both cylinder and engine head repaired or replaced. Fidelity should have paid for everything and Jaguar/Range Rover knew of issues with cars over heating and engine failure due to the known issues with the water pump and parts failing. This should have been a recall and I endured extensive out of pocket costs while my vehicle was not in my possession in total the repairs costs around $15,000 but just to get to work as I was on a work contract from out of state my out of pocket expenses just for a replacement vehicle (should have been pad for by Fidelity or Jaguar) was around almost $12,000 and this expense I was never reimbursed. I also had to pay $4,000 for engine tear down (this should have been absorbed in the bill to warranty company Fidelity. Jaguar did pay me back half ($2,000) but I just got the $2,000 (Dec 2025) Fidelity also refused to pay for the labor costs from Jaguar so I had to pay the difference ($2,000) which is why they reimbursed me only half of the $4,000 I paid out of pocket. This whole issue caused my extreme stress and anxiety to which I still suffer from. I have issues driving the vehicle because of this ordeal I am afraid something else will happen. I was never offered a rental replacement vehicle and Fidelity put me through extreme emotional distress by trying to blame me for the vehicles damage and after everything nothing was my fault vehicle was still under factory warranty when purchased and I bought the warranty from Fidelity with purchase of vehicle but I feel that I shouldn’t have had to go through all of the emotional distress and I should not of had to come out of pocket any moneys. I have suffered further from this ordeal as all repairs done to vehicle are reported and these issued caused my vehicles value to depreciate so much now I am upside down in my loan and dealing with the auto dealer selling bad cars. CarMax should be next someone needs to do a deep dive into their business practices. They sold me a vehicle with issues not disclosed and placed me into a financial hardship and upside down loan because they do fraud on a huge scale. I have paid vehicle loan down by $10,000 and still owe $33,000 and after all repairs vehicle now only valued at $13,000 I find this absolutely wrong on so many levels. Something or someone needs to protect consumers because there is huge fraud happening and I struggle trusting any corporation or contract. The law does not do enough and the elected officials and sub companies set up to protect consumers don’t do enough not even close
UPDATE: By the latest of 120 days after the Claim Submission Deadline (revised to 2/19/26), a reimbursement check or written denial are to be provided (6/19/26).
I have a 2012 range rover invoke pure sport I’ve had engine issues
By the latest of 120 days after the Claim Submission Deadline (12/30/25), a reimbursement check or written denial are to be provided (4/29/26).