Christina Spicer  |  February 10, 2021

Category: Legal News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Class action lawsuit claims deregulated energy company fleeced consumers

Independent electricity brokers misled consumers about deregulated energy prices, taking advantage of them in the process, a Maryland woman claims.

Lead plaintiff Angela Glikin claims that she switched from her local utility to the predecessor of Major Energy Electric Services, an independent company that was allowed to broker electricity services under deregulated energy markets starting in 1990. Gliken says that she paid approximately twice as much as she would have been charged under her local utility rates.

Gliken is accusing Major Energy of price gouging her and other consumers in a recently filed class action lawsuit claiming $100 million in damages.

In the 1990s, states began to “deregulate” their energy markets. While local utilities were responsible for the production and/or delivery of electricity to consumers, in a deregulated energy market consumers can purchase electricity from an independent company that has no role in production or distribution.

Deregulation was touted as a way for companies to compete on prices and, as a result, consumers were supposed to pay less; however, Gliken claims that companies like Major Energy Electric Service duped consumers into price structures they didn’t understand and charging them far more than their local utility.

“Some unscrupulous energy suppliers, like Major Energy, have exploited deregulation by deceiving customers hoping to save on their residential energy costs,” the lawsuit alleges that accuses Major Energy of engaging in practices “designed to profiteer at the expense of the consuming public.”

The class action lawsuit alleges that deregulated energy companies used variable rates to subject consumers to ever-increasing prices while claiming their rates were competitive. Consumers would be enticed into the variable rate plan by an initial, low fixed rate. Major Energy would allegedly tell consumers that the variable rate would be based on competitive market rates; however, the class action lawsuit claims that the rates were not tethered to the market. Instead, consumers paid much more than the local utility rate.

“No consumer would ever agree to Major Energy’s variable rate if they knew the truth,” the lawsuit alleges.

Deregulated energy brokers have faced legal and regulatory action in several states, according to Westchester & Fairfield County Business Journals. An investigation in New York reportedly found that between 2014 and 2016, residential customers were bilked out of paying $1.2 billion more by independent energy companies than they would have paid for service from their local utilities.

Gliken seeks to represent other Major Energy customers in the United States. The class action lawsuit alleges fraud, unjust enrichment, deceptive practices, and breach of contract.

Have you paid higher electricity bills from an independent energy broker? Are you concerned about deregulated energy prices? Tell us in the comment section below!

Lead plaintiff, Angela Glikin and the proposed Class Members are represented by Steven L. Wittels, J. Burkett McInturff, Susan J. Russell, D. Greg Blankinship, and Chantal Khalil.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

4 thoughts onDeregulated Energy Company Fleeced Consumers Out of $100 Million, Class Action Claims

  1. Jack Devine says:

    My fixed rate contract was sold by Starion to Major electric who doubled the rate. They admitted that was incorrect and told me what I should have been charged. I paid that amount to PPL. Major Energy (a.k.a Spark Energy now) keeps submitting a bill for $140.51 and wants me to overpay and accept Visa gift cards for the $140.51. I believe they are overstating income through this process and would like to see an audit of their financial records.

  2. Kynan Johnson says:

    since February of 2021 Consumers Energy has started an process of an 28 day billing period most months I find myself paying 2 bills an month is this legal. I live in Pontiac, Mi

  3. Misha Shah says:

    Please add me

  4. Heather Leyva says:

    Add me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.