By Top Class Actions  |  February 19, 2025

Category: Consumer News
Tom's of Maine Children's toothpaste on sale at a grocery store retailer shelf. Silly strawberry flavor.
(Photo Credit: melissamn/Shutterstock)

Tom’s of Maine class action lawsuit overview:

  • Who: Plaintiff Douglas White filed a class action lawsuit against Colgate-Palmolive Co. and Tom’s of Maine Inc.
  • Why: White claims the companies failed to warn consumers their Tom’s of Maine Kid’s Natural Fluoride-Free Toothpaste Silly Strawberry is contaminated with unsafe levels of lead and arsenic.
  • Where: The class action lawsuit was filed in a New York federal court.

A new class action lawsuit alleges Tom’s of Maine’s Kid’s Natural Fluoride-Free Toothpaste Silly Strawberry is contaminated with unsafe levels of lead and arsenic. 

Plaintiff Douglas White’s class action lawsuit claims Colgate-Palmolive and Tom’s of Maine failed to warn consumers that the toothpaste contains unsafe levels of the heavy metals, which he argues are powerful neurotoxins that can cause cognitive deficits, mental illness, dementia and hypertension.

White argues the alleged contamination is particularly concerning given the potentially severe and irreversible consequences of lead and arsenic consumption, especially in children.

“Children are particularly vulnerable to the potential harmful effects from arsenic exposure because of their smaller body sizes and rapid metabolism and growth,” the Tom’s of Maine kids’ toothpaste class action lawsuit claims.

White wants to  represent a nationwide class and New York subclass of consumers who purchased the Tom’s of Maine toothpaste during the applicable statute of limitations period.

Independent testing shows toothpaste contains unsafe levels of lead and arsenic, Tom’s of Maine class action claims

Independent testing conducted by the consumer and product safety advocacy group Lead Safe Mama, meanwhile, detected the presence of lead and arsenic in the Tom’s of Maine toothpaste at levels that are “staggeringly much more dangerous for children,” according to the Tom’s of Maine kids’ toothpaste class action. 

White argues Colgate-Palmolive and Tom’s of Maine use a marketing and advertising campaign that omits the presence of lead and arsenic from the ingredients list and that leads “reasonable” consumers to believe they are not purchasing a product with a known neurotoxin.  

“Defendants have improperly, deceptively, and misleadingly labeled and marketed their Product to reasonable consumers,” the Tom’s of Maine kids’ toothpaste class action says. 

White claims Colgate-Palmolive and Toms of Maine are guilty of negligence per se and unjust enrichment and violating New York General Business Law

The plaintiff demands a jury trial and requests declaratory relief and an award of statutory, treble and punitive damages for himself and all class members. 

A consumer filed a separate class action lawsuit against Tom’s of Maine last year over claims the company sold toothpaste products made with bacteria-contaminated water

Have you purchased Tom’s of Maine’s Kid’s Natural Fluoride-Free Toothpaste Silly Strawberry? Tell us in the comments.

The plaintiff is represented by Philip J. Furia and Jason P. Sultzer of Sultzer & Lipari PLLC.

The Tom’s of Maine class action lawsuit is White, et al. v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-00662, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.


Don’t Miss Out!

Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!


Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

88 thoughts onTom’s of Maine class action claims toothpaste contains heavy metals

  1. Anna C. says:

    We’re in Canada. I was using Tom’s strawberry toothpaste for my toddler since 2023 to now (Jan 2026). This news of lead and arsenic & class action came to me through a friend. Never would I have thought this could happen! Now I am left trying to figure out how to test the tube I have, and of course I’m immediately discontinuing its use.

  2. Alivia Lopez says:

    My son is 4. We have been using this brand for the past 2 years, at minimum. It was a lot of trial and error to find a flavor he would use & was SAFE. We settled on the orange mango. That flavor has been his go-to, twice a day for years. I just found out about this through social media. I’m now left trying to figure out what SAFE toothpaste I can use on my child before bedtime. I try to be so careful with what my children consume/ingest. It’s heartbreaking to think that I bought a “trusted” product that harms my child.

  3. Courtney McCollum says:

    We have been using this for over a year now so disappointing! My son just turned three and does swallow it sometimes. To find out it could contain theses terrible things

1 7 8 9

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.