By Heba Elsherif  |  April 14, 2017

Category: Labor & Employment

asbestos lung cancer secondhand asbestos exposureAvondale Industries, Inc., now known as Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. along with several other companies is facing a secondhand asbestos exposure lawsuit for failing to adequately inspect and provide sufficient warning to foreseeable users exposed to asbestos products deemed defective and unreasonably dangerous.

Plaintiffs Victor B., Sr., Victor B., Jr. and Ms. Nicole B. are the heirs of Ruth B. who they allege died from secondhand asbestos exposure.

They make the claim that the asbestos products, “and/or asbestos-containing equipment mined, manufactured, sold, distributed, supplied and/or used by these defendants were defective [and] unreasonably dangerous,” the asbestos lawsuit states.

The lawsuit recounts the incident where Victor B., as an intended bystander and worker, was exposed to the asbestos products and then transferred the dust particles home to his now deceased wife, Ruth B., who breathed in the asbestos contained clothing while doing laundry. This is known as secondhand asbestos exposure.

The asbestos lawsuit explains that “the decedent was exposed to and caused to inhale, during the decedent’s exposure period from approximately 1969 through at least the late 1970s dangerous amounts of asbestos dust and fibers during the routine handling and laundering of petitioner Victor [B.’s] asbestos contaminated clothing.”

Consequently, the complaint states that, “she developed mesothelioma from which she suffered and died.”

The secondhand asbestos exposure lawsuit alleges that the defects include the sale and distribution of the asbestos products as being unreasonably dangerous and that by possessing that unreasonable dangerous property, it presents a high potential for causing serious injury not limited to: cancer, respiratory disease, and death, as was the case with Ruth B.

Moreover, there was no sufficient warning or sufficient safety instructions that could have helped decrease the risks involved in being associated and exposed to the asbestos products. The defendants did not ensure proper safety precautions, and they did not ensure the safety of those users that were exposed to the asbestos products.

The asbestos lawsuit states that the defendants failed in inspecting “these products to assure sufficiency and adequacy of warnings and safety cautions.” Moreover, the defendants failed to “test or adequately test these products for defects or hazards they could present to the intended or foreseeable users,” the asbestos lawsuit argues.

Moreover, the defendants failed to “test or adequately test these products for defects or hazards they could present to the intended or foreseeable users,” the asbestos lawsuit argues.

The failure of the defendants to properly package these products, the failure of the defendant to alert the plaintiff for the need of adequate hygiene measures or assert proper procedures in controlling the level of exposure to asbestos, and failure to inform the plaintiff of probable risks to the exposure of asbestos products, deems the defendants liable in the plaintiff’s and decedent’s injuries, according to the family’s complaint.

The plaintiffs raise claims for strict liability and negligence as alleged in the complaint. They assert that the causes of action in negligence are due to the sale of the asbestos products and their contribution and proximate cause in the “decedent’s asbestos exposure and resultant malignant mesothelioma.”

The plaintiffs say the defendants lacked care in the use and handling of the asbestos products and failed to warn the plaintiff of the product’s hazards. Accordingly, “these defendants are strictly liable for manufacturing and selling dangerous and defective products.”

Alternatively, the defendants are allegedly liable for their negligence in manufacturing and selling dangerous and defective asbestos-containing products and for failing to properly warn regarding their dangers, the complaint said.

The Secondhand Asbestos Exposure Lawsuit is Case No. 2:17-CV-02636-JCZ-DEK, in the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans for the State of Louisiana.

Do YOU have a legal claim? Fill out the form on this page now for a free, immediate, and confidential case evaluation. The attorneys who work with Top Class Actions will contact you if you qualify to let you know if an individual asbestos lawsuit or asbestos class action lawsuit is best for you. [In general, asbestos mesothelioma lawsuits are filed individually by each plaintiff and are not class actions.] Hurry — statutes of limitations may apply.

Learn More

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


Get Help – It’s Free

Join a Free Asbestos Mesothelioma Class Action Lawsuit Investigation

If you or a loved one were exposed to asbestos and developed mesothelioma, lung cancer, or cancer in the lining of the lungs, abdomen or chest cavity, you may be able to take legal action against the companies responsible. Don’t delay – in most states the statute of limitations is two years to file an asbestos lawsuit after you’re diagnosed. Obtain a free and confidential case evaluation be filling out the form below.

An attorney will contact you if you qualify to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you.

Please Note: If you want to participate in this investigation, it is imperative that you reply to the law firm if they call or email you. Failing to do so may result in you not getting signed up as a client, if you qualify, or getting you dropped as a client.

Oops! We could not locate your form.

One thought on Secondhand Asbestos Exposure Alleged in Lawsuit Against Several Companies

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.