By Top Class Actions  |  March 31, 2022

Category: Electronics
A camera in car has on and recording for the traffic jam in the morning.
(Photo Credit: Joeahead/Shutterstock)

Rexing Unauthorized Dash Cameras FCC Fine Overview: 

  • Who: Dash cam manufacturer Rexing has agreed to pay a $75,000 fine to resolve allegations it violated rules set by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). 
  • Why: The FCC claimed Rexing sold unauthorized vehicle dash cameras that had not received clearance from the agency. 
  • Where: Rexing is based in Connecticut. 

Rexing has agreed to pay a fine of $75,000 for marketing unauthorized vehicle dash cameras in violation of rules set by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). 

The dashcam manufacturer admitted to breaking the FCCs rules by failing to receive clearance that its cameras met the agency’s technical requirements prior to marketing them. 

“Rexing admits that it violated the equipment marketing requirements set forth in the Commission’s rules by marketing radiofrequency equipment prior to authorization,” the FCC said in an order.

Further, the FCC says it found Rexing had failed to seek its authorization for around four years after it started selling the unauthorized dash cameras in question.

“The Company did not begin to seek the required FCC equipment authorizations until July 2020, approximately four years after it commenced marketing,” the FCC said in a consent decree.

Rexing Must Implement Compliance Plan, Officer Going Forward

In announcing the fine and settlement, the FCC said Rexing will be free of the charges so long as it pays the fine and creates and maintains a “compliance plan” going forward. 

Rexing will be required to have a compliance officer in charge of making sure the company remains in agreement with FCC regulations, according to a consent decree.

The FCC began looking into Rexing after it received complaints from drivers who claimed their dash cams were causing interference with their vehicle’s satellite radio.

“In response to a complaint alleging that aftermarket installation of certain Rexing dash cameras resulted in interference to some consumers’ car satellite radio reception, the Bureau’s Spectrum Enforcement Division reviewed the allegations in the complaint,” the FCC said. 

Last month, FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel proposed making it illegal to place voicemails on ringless calls made without consent. Rosenworcel, who claims the calls violate the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), made her proposal in response to a robocalling company’s petition, which argued ringless voicemail calls do not count as an actual call and thus should not be banned under the TCPA. 

The FCC was also in the news earlier this month after warning consumers to keep an eye out for deceptive marketing tactics used by some telecom providers. 

Have you purchased a dash cam manufactured by Rexing? Let us know in the comments!


Article Text


Don’t Miss Out!

Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!


Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

5 thoughts onRexing Agrees To Pay $75,000 Fine To Settle FCC Claim It Sold Unauthorized Dash Cams

  1. Angela Jackson says:

    Please add me

  2. Sam Carlino says:

    I purchased a dash camera from this company over a year ago and have had nothing but problems. I have hundreds of emails back and forth with this company trying to return this product. This company has caused me to lose so much money already and is still trying to take me for more! After over a year long argument with this company they agreed to refund me but made me pay for shipping. Once they recieved the product they then told me I have to pay 15% of the refund cost to restock the product. I have already lost more money than what the product is actually worth.

    1. Dawn Baldwin says:

      Add me

  3. Heather says:

    Add me

  4. Rose Parks says:

    Please add me

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.