Oura Ring class action lawsuit overview:
- Who: Three consumers filed a class action lawsuit against Oura Health Oy and Ouraring Inc.
- Why: The plaintiffs allege the companies violated California’s Automatic Renewal Law by not clearly disclosing renewal terms.
- Where: The Oura Ring class action lawsuit was filed in California federal court.
A new class action lawsuit accuses Oura Ring of violating California’s Automatic Renewal Law by failing to clearly and conspicuously explain automatic renewal offer terms.
Plaintiffs Kunal Lekhadia, Neel Patel and Gaurav Agrawal filed the class action complaint against Oura Health Oy and Ouraring Inc. on Dec. 26 in California federal court.
They claim Oura Ring’s automatic renewal and continuous service offers violate California’s Automatic Renewal Law, which requires companies to clearly and conspicuously explain automatic renewal offer terms.
Oura Ring failed to provide plaintiffs and other consumers with a means to cancel their subscriptions using a “cost-effective, timely and easy-to-use mechanism for cancellation,” the class action lawsuit alleges.
The plaintiffs allege Oura Ring’s business practices violate the ARL and California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) and Unfair Competition Law (UCL). As a result, they say Oura Ring has trapped consumers into subscriptions they no longer want.
Oura Ring class action claims subscriptions renew without clear consent
The Oura Ring class action lawsuit alleges the plaintiffs fell victim to the companies’ unlawful subscription billing and cancellation practices.
According to the complaint, both Agrawal and Lekhadia purchased a one-month prepaid Oura Ring membership — Lekhadia in August 2023 for $6.41 and Agrawal in December for $5.99 — but allege that the company continued to charge them monthly fees through automatic renewals without their knowledge.
Likewise, Patel purchased a one-year prepaid membership from Oura Ring in August 2024 for $69.99, but Oura Ring automatically renewed the $69.99 per year charge without his knowledge, the Oura Ring class action alleges.
The plaintiffs claim Oura Ring failed to provide clear and conspicuous disclosures about its subscription terms in visual proximity to the “Place Order” prompt. The company also failed to provide a means for consumers to cancel their subscriptions, they allege.
The plaintiffs seek to represent anyone in the United States who purchased a product or service from Oura Ring as part of an automatic renewal plan or continuous service offer within the last four years. They are suing for violations of California’s ARL, CLRA and UCL and seek certification of the class action, damages, fees, costs and a jury trial.
Meanwhile, Disney Platform Distribution Inc. is facing allegations it failed to cancel consumers’ subscriptions and continued charging them without consent.
What do you think of the claims made in this Oura Ring class action lawsuit? Join the discussion in the comments!
The plaintiffs are represented by Kevin J. Cole of KJC Law Group APC.
The Oura Ring class action lawsuit is Lekhadia, et al. v. Oura Health Oy, et al., Case No. 3:25-cv-10997, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Don’t Miss Out!
Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
- Ajinomoto expands glass contamination recall affecting Trader Joe’s, Kroger and other brands
- Adobe agrees to $150M settlement with DOJ over alleged subscription violations
- SoFi class action alleges data breach exposed sensitive customer information
- Amazon class action dismissed after judge finds plaintiffs failed to state valid CPA claim
