Was your privacy violated by a dermatology or aesthetic clinic’s website or emails?

Individuals who visited a dermatology or aesthetic clinic website or opened one of their emails may have had their personal data collected without consent. Fill out the form on this page to see if you qualify for this class action investigation.
Dermatology and aesthetic clinics are booming, offering a range of services from injectables to laser treatments. Because many of these procedures are considered medical treatments, these clinics are often subject to the same regulations as doctors, particularly when it comes to protecting patient information.
Despite this, some clinics are secretly using tracking pixels and other website tracking tools to collect detailed data about website visitors — including IP addresses, location and browsing activity — often without consent. This lack of transparency can put your personal information at risk and may even violate federal and state data privacy laws. If your privacy was compromised, you may be eligible to join a class action investigation.
Do you qualify?
If you visited the website or opened an email from one of the dermatology clinics listed below, you may qualify to join a data privacy class action lawsuit:
- Advanced Dermatology and Cosmetic Surgery
- California Skin Institute
- Forefront Dermatology
- Ideal Image
- LaserAway
- Novuskin
- Pure Medical Spa
- Ritacca Cosmetic Surgery & Medspa
- Sanova Dermatology
- Schweiger Dermatology Group
- Skin Laundry
- South Coast MedSpa
- U.S. Dermatology Partners
- West Dermatology
- Others
Fill out the form on this page to learn more.
Fill out the form on this page for more information.
What are tracking pixels?
Tracking pixels are tiny images embedded in websites and emails that allow companies to monitor user activity. Often only a single pixel large, these website tracking tools collect information such as page visits, clicks, and browsing behavior, giving companies detailed insights into how users interact with their content.
Operating quietly in the background, tracking pixels are seamlessly integrated into website and email content, making them virtually invisible to the typical user. This makes it easy for companies to gather personal data without your knowledge or consent, raising serious data privacy concerns.
Legal protections for data collection and website tracking
While businesses may use website tracking tools, including tracking pixels, they are required to comply with strict federal and state regulations that govern the collection, storage and sharing of personal information. These rules are designed to protect consumers’ data privacy and ensure that dermatology clinics and other companies handle personal information responsibly.
Federal protections against data collection
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) was built to protect consumers from unfair and deceptive business practices. One of the many things this organization does is regulate how and when companies can collect and share personal information. If an aesthetic or dermatology clinic uses tracking pixels to share personally identifiable information (PII) without clear disclosure or obtaining user consent, it may be violating federal law.
Additionally, many dermatology and aesthetic clinics are subject to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Under HIPAA, any business that handles health-related information is required to follow stringent guidelines regarding the collection, storage and disclosure of data. Sharing any health-related data — including treatment inquiries or IP addresses tied to medical content — without consent could constitute a HIPAA violation.
CCPA: Protecting California residents
In addition to federal protections, California residents have added privacy rights under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). Enacted in 2018, the CCPA gives consumers the right to:
- Know what personal information is being collected and how it is used or shared
- Request that personal information be deleted from a company’s records
- Opt out of the sale of personal information to third parties
- Correct inaccurate personal data
- Limit the disclosure of sensitive information
Under the CCPA, businesses are required to inform consumers when they collect personal information and give them the ability to opt out. Dermatology or aesthetic clinics that use tracking pixels without obtaining proper consent or letting users know they are in use may be in violation of CCPA regulations.
Take action if your privacy was compromised
If you believe your personal information was collected without consent by an aesthetic or dermatology clinic, you may be eligible to join a data privacy class action lawsuit investigation. This investigation is currently focusing on clinics that allegedly used tracking pixels or other website tracking tools to share patient data. Some of these clinics include:
- Advanced Dermatology and Cosmetic Surgery
- California Skin Institute
- Forefront Dermatology
- Ideal Image
- LaserAway
- Novuskin
- Pure Medical Spa
- Ritacca Cosmetic Surgery & Medspa
- Sanova Dermatology
- Schweiger Dermatology Group
- Skin Laundry
- South Coast MedSpa
- U.S. Dermatology Partners
- West Dermatology
- And more
If you interacted with one of these clinics online, you can confidentially share your experience using the form on this page. Your participation could help hold these clinics accountable for potential data privacy violations.
Fill out the form on this page to see if you qualify for a free case evaluation.
See If You Qualify
Join a dermatology and aesthetic clinic class action lawsuit investigation
Filling out this form is quick and easy. It only takes a few minutes to see if you qualify.
After you fill out the form, an attorney(s) or their agent(s) may contact you to discuss your legal rights.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT: THIS WEB PAGE IS AN ADVERTISEMENT AND THE PARTICIPATING ATTORNEY(S) ARE INCLUDED BECAUSE THEY PAY AN ADVERTISING FEE. Top Class Actions is not a law firm, lawyer referral service, or prepaid legal services plan. We do not endorse or recommend any third-party claims processing company, lawyer, or law firm who participates in the network. We do not make any representation, and have not made any judgment, as to the qualifications, expertise, or credentials of any participating lawyer or processing group. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services or claims processing to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services or claims processing performed by other lawyers or claims processing group. The information contained herein is not legal advice. Any information you submit to Top Class Actions does not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be protected by attorney-client privilege because Top Class Actions is not a law firm. Instead, your information will be forwarded to an attorney(s) or their agent(s) or a claims processing firm for the purpose of a confidential review and potential representation if you qualify. You will only be contacted by an attorney(s) or their agent(s) in response to your inquiry if your initial information appears to qualify you for representation. If you are not contacted by an attorney(s) or their agent(s) within one week, you should consult another firm since all legal claims are subject to filing deadlines. All photos on this website are stock art and do not depict clients.