A Mississippi family filed a Zofran lawsuit alleging the anti-nausea medication caused their daughter to be born with a cleft palate birth defect.
This is just one of many Zofran birth defects lawsuits recently filed against the drug’s maker, GlaxoSmithKline.
Zofran is a medication FDA approved for treating nausea and vomiting in patients when undergoing surgery and chemotherapy.
It has not been approved by the federal agency to treat morning sickness. However, many doctors prescribe this drug for off-label (non-FDA approved) purposes, most popularly to treat morning sickness during pregnancy.
It is, however, illegal for the manufacturer to promote use of the drug for any purpose not approved by the FDA.
This Zofran birth defects lawsuit alleges GSK has a duty to warn consumers and physicians of all possible side effects associated with taking its product. The plaintiffs allege the pharmaceutical company failed to warn this Mississippi couple of the birth defects their child was at risk of developing if taken during pregnancy.
Zofran Birth Defect Claims
Plaintiffs Patricia and Stephen T. are suing GSK on behalf of their daughter C.P.T., who was born with a cleft palate. That is a facial and oral deformity that occurs when the tissues of the face do not join properly during fetal development. The parents attribute the condition to her Zofran exposure while in the womb.
According to the couple’s Zofran cleft palate lawsuit, Patricia allegedly took Zofran during the first trimester of pregnancy. Months later, in January of this year, her daughter was born and immediately diagnosed with a cleft palate. This type of birth defect can impact a child’s eating, breathing, speech, and ability to speak.
Patricia and Stephen state that neither of their families have a history of birth defects and that the couple had one child prior to C.P.T.’s birth who was healthy and born without any birth defects.
Zofran Litigation
A research study performed by scientists from Harvard University and Boston University suggest that women who take Zofran while pregnant have a 2.37 percent increased risk of giving birth to a child with cleft palate.
Despite these findings, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently rejected a petition to change Zofran’s drug category, saying in an October 2015 statement that these studies “do not support a determination that there is an increased risk of fetal adverse outcomes.”
In light of this and other Zofran studies, many parents have become concerned about the role this anti-nausea medication may have played in their children’s development of birth defects. At least 34 Zofran birth defects lawsuits have been filed.
If you took Zofran for morning sickness while pregnant and gave birth to a child with cleft palate or other birth defects, you may have a legal claim.
The Zofran Cleft Palate Birth Defect Lawsuit is Case No. 5:15-cv-00070-DCB-MTP, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.
Do YOU have a legal claim? Fill out the form on this page now for a free, immediate, and confidential case evaluation. The birth defect attorneys who work with Top Class Actions will contact you if you qualify to let you know if an individual Zofran lawsuit or Zofran class action lawsuit is best for you. [In general, Zofran lawsuits are filed individually by each plaintiff and are not class actions.] Hurry — statutes of limitations may apply.
Get Help – It’s Free
Join a Free Zofran Birth Defects Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
If you or someone you know took Zofran while pregnant and had a baby with a birth defect, you or this person may have a legal claim. See if you qualify by filling out the short form below.
A Zofran birth defect attorney will contact you if you qualify to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you.
Oops! We could not locate your form.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2026 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.