Emily Sortor  |  May 22, 2018

Category: Archived Newsletters

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

A Michigan couple claims that General Motors’ side blind spot alert system, installed in 2013 – 2018 Chevrolet Cruze vehicles, is ineffective due to a design defect.

Plaintiffs Anthony and Lisa Hudson say the collision sensors installed in General Motors LLC Chevrolet Cruze vehicles are positioned in a such a way that they cannot function properly.

Allegedly, the vehicles are equipped with sensors designed to identify cars in a driver’s blind spot in the back left and right corners of a car, but by nature of their design, they are exposed to the elements during normal driving in a way that renders them unusable.

The Hudsons claim that the positioning of the sensors renders them useless, because they are exposed to rain, water on pavement, and snow in a way that makes them inoperable.

Additionally, the Chevy Cruze blind spot alert system class action lawsuit claims that the wiring of the sensors is ineffective, because the wiring is poorly sealed, exposing it to water and debris. Allegedly, this can cause the wiring to stop working.

The Chevrolet Cruze class action lawsuit claims that had the plaintiffs known that the positioning of the side blind spot sensors was ineffective, they would not have purchased the car, or would not have paid as much as they did for the car.

The Hudsons say that the side blind spot sensors are an optional feature of the car, and they specifically elected to have the sensors installed in their car, for an additional cost. The “side blind spot alert system,” of which the sensors are a part, is sold as part of the vehicles’ Enhanced Safety Package.

Allegedly, there is substantial demand among car shoppers of blind spot alert systems — roughly 25 percent of cars sold in the United States are equipped with them. The Chevy Cruze blind spot sensor class action claims that GM was able to use the side blind spot sensors as a selling feature for their vehicles, despite the alleged defect of the systems.

The Hudsons note that the functioning of the side blind spot alert system is covered by the vehicles’ warranty, but the warranty is ineffective in addressing the problem, because “if the sensor has been damaged, GM will replace it with a new sensor in the same problematic location.”

According to the GM class action lawsuit, GM should have known that the sensors were ineffective due to their placement, as the company conducts testing on their cars before releasing them into the market.

Additionally, the Hudsons claim that GM heard from consumers that the sensors were ineffective, as numerous consumers submitted complaints about the problem and filed warranty claims regarding the sensors.

Nonetheless, GM allegedly has made no effort to truly remedy the sensor problem or to compensate consumers who were financially injured by their purchase of the Enhanced Safety Package, the Chevy Cruze class action lawsuit states.

The plaintiffs are represented by Daniel A. Edelman and Cathleen M. Combs of Edelman Combs Latturner & Goodwin LLC; Frank Melchiore; and by Daniel Romano of Romano Law PLLC. 

The GM Chevy Cruze Side Blind Spot Sensor Defect Class Action Lawsuit is Anthony and Lisa Hudson v. General Motors LLC, Case No. 2:18-cv-11574-AC-SDD, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.

UPDATE: The GM Chevy Cruze Side Blind Spot Sensor Defect Class Action Lawsuit was dismissed on July 10. 2019. Top Class Actions will let our viewers know if another case is filed!

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


43 thoughts onGM Class Action Says Chevy’s Blind Spot Alert System is Defective

  1. Kelley Montgomery says:

    My Buick Verano 2015, 57K miles is having two new sensors installed on Monday. $1500, total cost. The dealer knew exactly what the problem was when I described what was happening to my car. This is a known issue.

  2. MindyWest says:

    I have a 2016 Chevrolet Equinox with 26K miles. I have a side detection system alert. I’m not sure if it is covered or not? Seems costly since it appears manufacturing fault? I would like information about this.

  3. Jason cullinan says:

    Never received a service bulletin for my 2014 impala limited lt and never imagined I would have electronics failures, heat, transmission, abs etc. I now have close to 100k miles on it and extended warranty is up. I am not about to pay to have this replaced again at close to 1k only for other side to fail again

  4. Carlton Browning says:

    I have a 2014 Chevy Cruz LTZ with the issue of the blind spot indicator system that stop working shortly after the 2 year warranty ended. I have been with out the system for more than 4 years. The system is much to expensive to fix on my own and as I have been told, the system needs repaired every two years. I recently discovered a recall had been released for the problem at hand back in 2018 but I did not get the documentation. I called GM office to ask them to reinstate the recall but I was told to take the car to the local GM dealer and have the blind spot system replaced at my expense.

  5. Justin Drymon says:

    2015 Chevy Cruze. Had the passenger side replaced, paying $100 deductible. Week later the driver’s side went and had to pay another $100 deductible. 2 years later and I am back to the passenger side acting up just as we have a winter storm rolling in. Clearly this is a continuous issue and their idea of packing grease around these as they replace them doesn’t do the trick since it is shot again

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.