Call Recording Practices May Break California Invasion of Privacy Law

The call recording practices of certain businesses may actually violate California invasion of privacy law, though call recording is certainly a widespread practice.

A number of businesses are currently under investigation for possibly violating California invasion of privacy law, including the appliance brand Miele.

If you have been affected by violations of California invasion of privacy law through phone recording, you may be able to participate in a class action call investigation.

If you are a California resident and have been subject to unlawful phone recording by Miele or another company, your privacy rights under California invasion of privacy law may have been violated, and you may be entitled to compensation.

California Invasion of Privacy Law

Call recording rules under California invasion of privacy law are stricter than these laws at a federal level. According to California invasion of privacy law, businesses like Miele are not allowed to record a phone call without first obtaining the consent of all parties on the call.

California call recording laws do not only apply to actual residents of California. Instead, California invasion of privacy law protects anyone who called or were called by someone else while in the state of California. However, this particular California invasion of privacy law class action investigation specifically applies to California residents.

If you believe that your call to or from a company was recorded without first receiving a warning, the company may have violated the phone recording rules of California invasion of privacy law.

California Phone Recording Practices

It is an extremely common practice for businesses to record phone calls with customers. All sorts of businesses record phone calls, and there’s usually nothing illegal about it. A business may record phone calls for their own records, or to evaluate the performance of their employees.

You may have previously heard a warning on a call along these lines: “this call is being monitored for quality assurance.” This warning is meant to inform those on the line that the call is being recorded, and give them a chance to opt out.

Of course, these warnings are often automated, and there’s often no chance to respond with so much as a “yes” or “no.” But a verbal response is actually not necessary under California invasion of privacy law. Instead, simply staying on the line after a call recording warning has been given grants consent, and hanging up fairly firmly indicates that you don’t want your call to be recorded.

If you do not hear a warning and believe that a call was recorded, the company may have violated California invasion of privacy law. Lawsuits over violations of phone recording laws have targeted some major companies, and in some of these cases, lawsuits have ended in multi-million dollar settlements.

Unlawful California phone recording by Miele or other businesses could violate consumers’ call recording rights under California invasion of privacy law. If you are a California resident and have been subjected to illegal California phone recording, you may be able to seek compensation by participating in a California phone recording class action lawsuit.

Join a FREE California Call Recording Class Action Lawsuit Investigation

If you live in California and you did not receive a warning when calling a toll-free number, your call may have been recorded in violation of California law, and you may be entitled to compensation. See if you qualify to file a California call recording class action lawsuit.

Join Now