Emily Sortor  |  September 6, 2019

Category: Household

gotham steel non-stick panA class action lawsuit claims that E. Mishan & Sons Inc.’s Gotham Steel cooking pans are not non-stick, despite advertising to the contrary.

Carl Mack and Alec Gable say they each purchased pans made by the company specifically because they saw advertisements that the pans were non-stick. 

Mack claims he relied on the packaging of the product and the TV advertisements to make his purchase, which both marketed the product as non-stick.

Allegedly, the commercials for the pan advertised that no butter or oil was required.

Mack says that he used the pans without oil or butter, consistent with advertisements for the product. However, food allegedly began sticking “severely” to the pan within a month of Mack’s purchase of it and he stopped using the pan.

Gable says he purchased two pans from the Gotham Steel website in 2018. Allegedly, he decided to purchase the pans because, like Mack, he saw advertisements showing that they were non-stick.

Gable claims that after two uses, he began cooking with butter and oil, but even the use of butter and oil did not prevent the food from sticking. Allegedly, the pans were “often caked with black burn marks” and Gable got rid of the pans after about a month of use.

The Gotham Steel non-stick pans class action lawsuit says that Gable and Mack’s experiences are common to many customers even though they used the pans as directed.

The Gotham Steel non-stick pan false advertising class action lawsuit says that E. Mishan & Sons Inc. knew or should have known that the pans were not non-stick as claimed, citing numbers customer complaints about the issue.

Allegedly, E. Mishan & Sons Inc. violated the New York General Business Law, which prohibits “deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any business, trade, or commerce or in the furnishing of any service” in the state, and also prohibits false advertising.
The customers say that they were financially injured by E. Mishan & Sons Inc.’s misrepresentations of the Gotham Steel pans because had they been aware that the pans were not actually non-stick, they would not have purchased the pans or would not have paid as much as they did for them.

The non-stick pan class action lawsuit aims to hold the company liable for breach of express warranty, among other claims.
Did you buy a Gotham Steel non-stick pan? Let us know in the comment section below if you had a similar experience to these plaintiffs.

Mack and Gable are represented by Jason P. Sultzer, Joseph Lipari, and Adam Gonnelli of The Sultzer Law Group PC and by Bonner Walsh of Walsh PLLC.

The Gotham Steel Non-Stick Cooking Pans Class Action Lawsuit is Carl Mack, et al. v. E. Mishan & Sons Inc., Case No. 1:19-cv-08233, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


1,444 thoughts onGotham Steel Class Action Says Everything Sticks To Non-Stick Pans

  1. tara careme says:

    I bought several of these as christmas gifts last year for my family and myself, Im on a fixed income so I try to buy good products when I can. I was very very upset after spending the amount tHat I spent to have have the pans all stick even when using butter things stuck. It messed up my whole christmas last year . For the amount I spent on these pans I could gotten something else for gifts.

  2. edith says:

    I bought 6 pans
    2 for me and 1 for my mother for my mother-in-law one for my sister-in-law an my sister all as a Mother’s Day gift can u believe I was deceived after I used mines and was ashamed to bought and gift these false advertised scam pans

  3. Pat Iurato says:

    Add me

  4. Darlene Olvera says:

    I also had a sticking problem with my Gotham steel skillet. I got so frustrated that I threw it in the trash can. Would never buy another one!

  5. Steve Ramos says:

    I did have problems with not only 1 but 2 pans.

  6. Judy Thompson says:

    Please add me, very unhappy with pan.

  7. Carletta Lino says:

    The same class action needs to be brought against a certain copper chef square deep pan. That pan is awful and is advertised as non-stick. Nothing could be further from the truth. I’m glad I only got stuck with one pan and didn’t purchase an ensemble.

  8. Robert Lee says:

    PLEASE ADD ME I USE PAM IT STILL STICK.

  9. Jane says:

    It is stick no matter how I treated the pan!

  10. C.Stevens says:

    I have stopped using as well because of the non-stick claim. Waste of money.

1 61 62 63 64 65 138

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.