Emily Sortor  |  September 6, 2019

Category: Household

gotham steel non-stick panA class action lawsuit claims that E. Mishan & Sons Inc.’s Gotham Steel cooking pans are not non-stick, despite advertising to the contrary.

Carl Mack and Alec Gable say they each purchased pans made by the company specifically because they saw advertisements that the pans were non-stick. 

Mack claims he relied on the packaging of the product and the TV advertisements to make his purchase, which both marketed the product as non-stick.

Allegedly, the commercials for the pan advertised that no butter or oil was required.

Mack says that he used the pans without oil or butter, consistent with advertisements for the product. However, food allegedly began sticking “severely” to the pan within a month of Mack’s purchase of it and he stopped using the pan.

Gable says he purchased two pans from the Gotham Steel website in 2018. Allegedly, he decided to purchase the pans because, like Mack, he saw advertisements showing that they were non-stick.

Gable claims that after two uses, he began cooking with butter and oil, but even the use of butter and oil did not prevent the food from sticking. Allegedly, the pans were “often caked with black burn marks” and Gable got rid of the pans after about a month of use.

The Gotham Steel non-stick pans class action lawsuit says that Gable and Mack’s experiences are common to many customers even though they used the pans as directed.

The Gotham Steel non-stick pan false advertising class action lawsuit says that E. Mishan & Sons Inc. knew or should have known that the pans were not non-stick as claimed, citing numbers customer complaints about the issue.

Allegedly, E. Mishan & Sons Inc. violated the New York General Business Law, which prohibits “deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any business, trade, or commerce or in the furnishing of any service” in the state, and also prohibits false advertising.
The customers say that they were financially injured by E. Mishan & Sons Inc.’s misrepresentations of the Gotham Steel pans because had they been aware that the pans were not actually non-stick, they would not have purchased the pans or would not have paid as much as they did for them.

The non-stick pan class action lawsuit aims to hold the company liable for breach of express warranty, among other claims.
Did you buy a Gotham Steel non-stick pan? Let us know in the comment section below if you had a similar experience to these plaintiffs.

Mack and Gable are represented by Jason P. Sultzer, Joseph Lipari, and Adam Gonnelli of The Sultzer Law Group PC and by Bonner Walsh of Walsh PLLC.

The Gotham Steel Non-Stick Cooking Pans Class Action Lawsuit is Carl Mack, et al. v. E. Mishan & Sons Inc., Case No. 1:19-cv-08233, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


1,444 thoughts onGotham Steel Class Action Says Everything Sticks To Non-Stick Pans

  1. Michelle I. Jaeger says:

    Yes – bought 2 pans and within 2 months they were darkened/blackened like my 5 year old pan.

  2. Melissa Pound says:

    My husband bought me two fry pans and a skillet for Christmas, because I really wanted them…not even a year later I had stopped using them. My food sticks to them, they are hard to clean and sometimes too messy.

  3. Kim campian says:

    I bought 2, frying pan & the big deep pot. Damnd if everything sticks to them. I was a sucker for they’re pitch.

  4. Jackie Woods says:

    I have 3 and them start to sticking

  5. Richard Mogavero says:

    I bought one because on my old pans food stuck, especially eggs.
    Bought the Gotham because of their advertising, tried all ways of cooking
    and still my eggs stick.
    Another disadvantage is that the pot
    warped and is no longer useable.
    No…. I did not overheat it or ever put
    it on the electric burner empty.

  6. Heather Howard says:

    Yes I bought 1 just out of curiosity and like everyone else has said it’s crap not worth a penny!

  7. Trina Werly says:

    Yes. I still have it. Definitely NOT NON STICK

  8. Artem Arutyunyan says:

    Same story as the above purchased the set since fell for their false advertising practices and what a miserable quality it is?! It’s worse than China cheapest pan fromnwalmart that o believe performs better. I am in.

  9. Christina Watts says:

    I have bought several different pans and they all do the same thing. I got them all at different times and places and didn’t use them right away because I put them in my motorhome. We went on vacation to find out the pans were crap. And had to spend more money on other pan’s.

  10. S Ryan says:

    Bought two and they both started sticking after a few weeks !!!!

    1. Diana Hauck says:

      I bought a few pans and they started sticking after a few weeks. Even use PAM and other non stick sprays. Leaves black spots on the pans.

1 46 47 48 49 50 138

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.