Emily Sortor  |  September 6, 2019

Category: Household

gotham steel non-stick panA class action lawsuit claims that E. Mishan & Sons Inc.’s Gotham Steel cooking pans are not non-stick, despite advertising to the contrary.

Carl Mack and Alec Gable say they each purchased pans made by the company specifically because they saw advertisements that the pans were non-stick. 

Mack claims he relied on the packaging of the product and the TV advertisements to make his purchase, which both marketed the product as non-stick.

Allegedly, the commercials for the pan advertised that no butter or oil was required.

Mack says that he used the pans without oil or butter, consistent with advertisements for the product. However, food allegedly began sticking “severely” to the pan within a month of Mack’s purchase of it and he stopped using the pan.

Gable says he purchased two pans from the Gotham Steel website in 2018. Allegedly, he decided to purchase the pans because, like Mack, he saw advertisements showing that they were non-stick.

Gable claims that after two uses, he began cooking with butter and oil, but even the use of butter and oil did not prevent the food from sticking. Allegedly, the pans were “often caked with black burn marks” and Gable got rid of the pans after about a month of use.

The Gotham Steel non-stick pans class action lawsuit says that Gable and Mack’s experiences are common to many customers even though they used the pans as directed.

The Gotham Steel non-stick pan false advertising class action lawsuit says that E. Mishan & Sons Inc. knew or should have known that the pans were not non-stick as claimed, citing numbers customer complaints about the issue.

Allegedly, E. Mishan & Sons Inc. violated the New York General Business Law, which prohibits “deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any business, trade, or commerce or in the furnishing of any service” in the state, and also prohibits false advertising.
The customers say that they were financially injured by E. Mishan & Sons Inc.’s misrepresentations of the Gotham Steel pans because had they been aware that the pans were not actually non-stick, they would not have purchased the pans or would not have paid as much as they did for them.

The non-stick pan class action lawsuit aims to hold the company liable for breach of express warranty, among other claims.
Did you buy a Gotham Steel non-stick pan? Let us know in the comment section below if you had a similar experience to these plaintiffs.

Mack and Gable are represented by Jason P. Sultzer, Joseph Lipari, and Adam Gonnelli of The Sultzer Law Group PC and by Bonner Walsh of Walsh PLLC.

The Gotham Steel Non-Stick Cooking Pans Class Action Lawsuit is Carl Mack, et al. v. E. Mishan & Sons Inc., Case No. 1:19-cv-08233, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


1,444 thoughts onGotham Steel Class Action Says Everything Sticks To Non-Stick Pans

  1. Miss Trish says:

    For the first week, everything was fine. I washed them so easily so I know I did nothing wrong. I have the whole set! Now, almost everything sticks to it! At least I am not alone. Just makes me angry because I wanted to buy the red ones to match my kitchen.

  2. Dawna Andrews says:

    Worse pans for cleaning. Had to replace all with Blue Diamond.
    Please add me.

  3. Judith Ann Hall says:

    I have two of the Gotham pans and food sticks to them now.

  4. Caller Coney says:

    Add me please

  5. Lisa Marshall says:

    These pans were the worst. I had high hopes for them after watching the infomercial. I qui CV kly ordered happy to get them. Tried to fry potatoes first they stuck badly. I thought it was me until i continued to use them and it didn’t get any better with or without oil. Trashed them and said it was a learn experience.

  6. Jerry Bommarito says:

    I bought 2 and they suck! Not to mention they say then need to be seasoned and they do not season at all. If you are looking for a great replacement, T-fal Ultimate Hard Anodized pan. Pay more, but it doesn’t stick

  7. Cheryl vokaty says:

    Purchased these pans because of non stick. Ended up throwing in the trash….did not even consider donating. Wasn’t worth the effort

  8. Mel says:

    Purchased 2 at 39.98. Did the oven season steps an things were sticking. Then found gummy lines in pans that you could peel out. Clean with water only as suggestef. WASTED money. For someone on fixed income HIGH waste.

  9. Patricia Carpenter says:

    I first bought the one seen on tv. I loved it at first. Then I bought a set of the pans. After using them for a couple of months, they are now sticking. At first you didn’t need oil or butter , as advertised. Now everything sticks even with butter or oil. Such a waste of money.

  10. Brandi Stofko says:

    These pans were terrible!! Purchased 2 and they only worked right the 1st time!

1 20 21 22 23 24 138

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.