This settlement is closed!
Please see what other class action settlements you might qualify to claim cash from in our Open Settlements directory!
Fashion Nova has agreed to a $5.15 million class action lawsuit settlement to resolve claims that its website is not compatible with screen-reading software for the blind.
The Fashion Nova settlement benefits a nationwide and California subclass of legally blind individuals who have attempted to access Fashion Nova’s website using screen-reading software since Feb. 26, 2018.
According to the Fashion Nova class action lawsuit, the retailer’s website is not compatible with screen-reading software for the blind and vision-impaired. As a result, blind individuals are allegedly denied an experience equivalent to that of sighted individuals.
Fashion Nova, an online clothing retailer, has not admitted any wrongdoing but agreed to a $5.15 million class action settlement to resolve the accessibility allegations.
Under the terms of the Fashion Nova settlement, only California class members are eligible to receive a cash benefit. The exact amount of each payment will vary depending on the number of class members who make approved claims.
If the net settlement amount is sufficient, each subclass member will receive $4,000. If the net settlement amount is not sufficient to pay $4,000 to all approved claims, the settlement administrator will divide the net settlement amount equally among all approved claims, resulting in lower payments.
The deadline for exclusion and objection is Oct. 20, 2025.
The final approval hearing for the Fashion Nova class action lawsuit settlement is scheduled for Feb. 12, 2026.
To receive settlement benefits, class members must submit a valid claim form by Oct. 20, 2025.
Who’s Eligible
Legally blind individuals who have attempted to access Fashion Nova’s website with screen-reading software since Feb. 26, 2018.
Potential Award
Up to $4,000 for California class members.
Proof of Purchase
N/A
Claim Form
NOTE: If you do not qualify for this settlement do NOT file a claim.
Remember: you are submitting your claim under penalty of perjury. You are also harming other eligible Class Members by submitting a fraudulent claim. If you’re unsure if you qualify, please read the FAQ section of the Settlement Administrator’s website to ensure you meet all standards (Top Class Actions is not a Settlement Administrator). If you don’t qualify for this settlement, check out our database of other open class action settlements you may be eligible for.
Claim Form Deadline
10/20/2025
Case Name
Alcazar v. Fashion Nova Inc., Case No. 4:20-cv-01434-JST, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Final Hearing
02/12/2026
Settlement Website
Claims Administrator
Alcazar v. Fashion Nova Inc.
c/o CPT Group Inc.
50 Corporate Park
Irvine, CA 92606
[email protected]
888-678-2596
Class Counsel
Thiago M. Coelho
WILSHIRE LAW FIRM PLC
Defense Counsel
Amy P. Lally
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
- $1.5M SeaWorld annual pass class action settlement
- Family Dollar ground coffee class action settlement
- $3.1M Midland States Bank overdraft fees class action settlement
- $6.75M Quaker Oats class action settlement
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2026 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
29 thoughts on$5.15M Fashion Nova website accessibility class action settlement
An Evidentiary hearing was held on March 30, 2026 with the matter still under review and a final settlement decision still to be made.
The DOJ did issue a Statement of Interest for this case dated 2/2/26 before the final hearing. The statement stated that it sees this case “principally to enrich class counsel” and not to properly benefit those with disabilities such that the settlement is not “fair, reasonable, and adequate” along with a recommendation that “the Court should reject it.” Additionally, it was incorrectly stated previously in these comments that “the court issued their Final Approval on 2/12/26” which was incorrect as it seems no ruling has yet been made.
WOW. LAW FIRMS AREN’T UPDATING STATIS ON THE CLASS ACTIONS
NO RESPONSE WHEN I EMAIL THEM EITHER
🥹