Jon Styf ย |ย  May 26, 2023

Category: Legal News
Close up of Twitter signage at their headquarters, representing the Supreme Court twitter ruling.
(Photo Credit: ANTON ZUBCHEVSKYI/Shutterstock)

Twitter terrorist claim overview:ย 

  • Who: The United States Supreme Court ruled that Twitter, Facebook and Google were not responsible for aiding and abetting an attack from the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. ย 
  • Why: A pair of lawsuits, which were blocked, claimed that the social media platforms aided and abetted two terrorist attacks.
  • Where: The ruling came from the United States Supreme Court related to ISIS actions in Turkey.

The United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Twitter, Facebook and Google were not responsible for aiding and abetting an attack from the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria on the Reina Nightclub in Istanbul, Turkey. A second lawsuit against Google related to coordinated attacks killing 130 people in Paris, France, was also blocked.

โ€œNone of plaintiffsโ€™ allegations suggest that defendants culpably โ€œassociate[d themselves] withโ€ the Reina attack, โ€œparticipate[d] in it as something that [they] wishe[d] to bring about,โ€ or sought โ€œby [their] action to make it succeed,โ€ the ruling, written by Justice Clarence Thomas, stated in the Twitter Inc. v. Taamneh, et al., opinion.

The creation of social media networks are no more responsible for the attacks than those who created cell phones, email or the internet, Thomas wrote in the Supreme Court Twitter ruling.

The plaintiffs in the case did not provide reasons that the social media networks would be involved in the nightclub attack nor did they show proof that the relationship with ISIS was more than the normal relationship with any social media user, according to the Supreme Court Twitter ruling.

Google not responsible for ISIS videos before Paris attack that killed 130, ruling says

The Supreme Court also ruled that Google was not responsible for a Paris, France, set of coordinated attacks that killed 130, according to a separate ruling in Reynoldo Gonzalez, et al, petitioners v. Google LLC.

Nohemi Gonzalez, a 23-year-old American, was killed in the attacks and the lawsuit had claimed that Google had benefited from a profit-sharing agreement with ISIS related to videos posted to its account. The ruling noted that much of the Google case fell under the Twitter terrorist ruling.

Twitter is currently facing a class action lawsuit stating that it secretly used users telephone numbers and email addresses for advertising and marketing.

Do you believe social media companies should be responsible for content posted to their websites? Let us know in the comments.


Donโ€™t Miss Out!

Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!


Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.