Update:
- A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit from fans of actress Ana De Armas because the class did not show enough evidence they were damaged because the actress did not appear in the film “Yesterday” after appearing in the movie’s trailer.
- The plaintiffs only submitted the resumes of their attorneys, academic papers on how movie trailers shape consumer expectations for movies and a Google Trends screenshot showing De Armas’ popularity grew around the time of the release of “Yesterday.”
- U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson called the class action a “plainly inadequate evidentiary showing.”
‘Yesterday’ movie class action lawsuit overview:
- Who: Plaintiffs Conor Woulfe and Peter Micael Rosza filed a false advertising class action lawsuit against Universal Pictures.
- Why: Universal Pictures allegedly promoted the movie “Yesterday” using trailers featuring the famous actress Ana de Armas even though she had been cut from the film.
- Where: The lawsuit was filed in California federal court.
(Jan. 26, 2022)
On Jan. 21, two disgruntled fans of Ana de Armas filed a class action lawsuit against Universal Pictures, alleging they were under the false impression that the actress was in the 2019 film “Yesterday” because she appeared in the trailer.
After paying about $3.99 to rent the film on Amazon Prime, plaintiffs Conor Woulfe and Peter Michael Rosza learned the actress had been cut from the movie. They claim they would not have paid to rent the movie if they had known de Armas would not appear in it.
They filed the Universal Pictures class action lawsuit on behalf of themselves and a proposed class of other consumers who paid to rent the film because they believed Ana de Armas was cast in it.
“Because consumers were promised a movie with Ana de Armas by the trailer for ‘Yesterday’ but did not receive a movie with any appearance of Ana de Armas at all, such consumers were not provided with any value for their rental or purchase,” the Universal Pictures class action lawsuit alleges.
Woulfe and Rosza argue that Universal Pictures engaged in “false, deceptive and misleading advertising” of the movie.
In the film, Himesh Patel stars as Jack Malik, who wakes up one day to find that he is the only person in the world to remember the Beatles. He subsequently claims credit for their songs and quickly becomes a world-famous star.
De Armas was cast as Roxane, a secondary love interest of Malik in the film. Malik was going to sing her a rendition of the song “Something,” but de Armas’ scenes were ultimately cut from the film.
Class action: Universal used De Armas’s star power to entice viewers
The main actors were largely unknown prior to the release of “Yesterday,” the deceptive marketing class action lawsuit alleges. On the other hand, de Armas is a successful actress who has starred in popular movies such as “Blade Runner 2049,” “Knives Out” and the James Bond film “No Time to Die.”
“Unable to rely on fame of the actors playing Jack Malik or Ellie [Malik’s primary love interest] to maximize ticket and movie sales and rentals, Defendant consequently used Ms. De Armas’s fame, radiance and brilliance to promote the film by including her scenes in the movie trailers advertising ‘Yesterday,’” the Universal Pictures class action lawsuit asserts.
The lawsuit seeks injunctive relief, restitution, disgorgement of profits and other damages.
Do you think the ‘Yesterday’ movie class action lawsuit will be successful? Tell us your thoughts in the comments below!
The plaintiffs are represented by Cody R. LeJeune of LeJeune Law PC.
The ‘Yesterday’ movie class action lawsuit is Conor Woulfe, et al. v. Universal City Studios LLC d/b/a Universal Pictures, et al., Case No. 2:22-cv-00459, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.
Don’t Miss Out!
Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
- Warner Brothers Class Action Says Company Fails To Pay Motion Picture Workers In Timely Manner
- Evenflo Joins Growing List of Companies With Class Action Complaints for Websites Lacking Access for Visually Impaired
- FedEx Drop Boxes Inaccessible to Wheelchair Users, Class Action Alleges
- Blind Man’s McDonald’s Drive-Thru Only Hours Discrimination Class Action Tossed
17 thoughts onUniversal class action over deceptive ‘Yesterday’ trailer to proceed
Add me
This lawsuit is nonsense! Suits like this waste the courts time and the county’s money. The judge should have thrown this case out. They were not injured or damaged by paying $3.99 to rent a money. I know they didn’t rent the movie just for her! I’ve seen movies in the theater that I wish I could have gotten my money back and never would have thought to sue the studio. People need to stop looking for a quick buck and work for the money they want. Leave the court time for those that have real suits.
I actually bought the dvd please add me
This is a ridiculous lawsuit! Seriously what type of damages could the plaintiffs possibly suffered because a certain actress wasn’t in the movie. I rent movies all the time that disappointed me and paid $6.99, not $3.99. Go online and look at pictures of the actress if your that desperate. People don’t realize that these insignificant lawsuits end up costing the consumer. American needs to get off their butts and go be a productive member of society instead of always looking to get rich quick. I’m actually appalled that this is an actual lawsuit! People are getting cancer cancer and dying from products. This is so very trivial!!
Very mislead and disappointed
Add me please
Yes my husband I was wondering why the trailer has such a powerful actress that never appears in movie. . We paid big money to see film in theaters and was disappointed.
Add my husband Ken and myself. Very misled and disappointed.
Please add me
Please add me
Please add me
Add me