Brigette Honaker  |  December 27, 2019

Category: Blood Thinners

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

lovenox syringeA website has been established for a Lovenox price-fixing class action lawsuit which recently saw the certification of a Class of indirect purchasers of the anticoagulant.

The website provides information regarding the class action which is scheduled to go to trial unless a settlement can be reached.

While the website is live, it is not accepting claims yet. Top Class Actions will provide claim filing instructions as soon as they become available.

Meanwhile, viewers will receive an email notice when this article is updated with more information by using a free Top Class Actions account and clicking the “Follow Article” button at the top of the post.

Plaintiffs in the Lovenox class action lawsuit motioned for Class certification in November and were subsequently granted certification by the court.

The certified Class includes individuals or entities who bought or provided payment for Lovenox or enoxaparin (the generic form of the drug) between Sept. 21, 2011 and Sept. 30, 2015.

The Class includes hospitals, third party payors, and people without insurance from the following states: Arizona, Arkansas, California, District of Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.

Class Members had until Dec. 19, 2019 to exclude themselves from the Class or object to the Lovenox class action lawsuit.

Lovenox, and the generic form enoxaparin, are blood thinning medications used to manage the risk of blood clots. The medication is particularly prescribed to people who are at risk for developing clots in the legs through a condition known as deep vein thrombosis.

According to plaintiffs in the Lovenox class action lawsuit, manufacturers Momenta Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Sandoz Inc. conspired together to artificially increase the cost of the medications. The companies allegedly achieved this by suppressing other generic forms of Lovenox – meaning that the only options for the medication were Lovenox or the generic enoxaparin.

In 2003, Momenta and Sandoz reportedly reached an agreement under which the companies would split Sandoz’s profits from generic enoxaparin. However, according to the plaintiffs, the terms of this agreement were only in effect if Sandoz was the only company to sell the generic drug.

In order to suppress the competition, Momenta allegedly secured a patent on the quality test used in the production of enoxaparin. This reportedly meant that no other companies could manufacture the generic medication without infringing on the patent.

Other companies attempted to sell the generic medication or patent the testing practice but were allegedly manipulated or sued by Momenta until they backed off – ensuring the company’s control of the market.

As a result of the agreement and subsequent suppression of competition, Momenta and Sandoz reportedly secured a monopoly which allowed them to increase the price of the medication. Plaintiffs in the Lovenox class action lawsuit claim that indirect purchasers of the products were financially harmed by the alleged price-fixing scheme.

Did you take Lovenox or the generic form of the drug, enoxaparin? Share your experiences in the comment section below.

Plaintiffs and the recently certified Class are represented by Brendan P. Glackin, Mark P. Chalos, Dean M. Harvey, Bruce W. Leppla, Katherine L. Benson, John Tate Spragens and Adam Gitlin of Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP.

The Lovenox Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit is The Hospital Authority of Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County Tennessee, et al. v. Momenta Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al., Case No. 3:15-cv-01100, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


108 thoughts onLovenox Price-Fixing Class Action Website Is Live

  1. A Modi says:

    Add me. I had to take this and on limited income as a student

  2. Heidi Carr says:

    PLease add me

  3. TS says:

    Please add when available

  4. kathleen says:

    2x in 2019 when I came off coumadin for surgery please add me

  5. Moneekia Hill says:

    Please add me

  6. Marjorie s Davis says:

    Was on this medication for over a month, twice a day….told could only use this and not a GENERIC form. I looked like a big purple grape by giving myself this injection but had to live after blood clots and a double blood transfusion. Please keep me on hand and ADD!!!

  7. Suzanne Johnson says:

    Used this several times for blood clots twice while pregnant. Please add me

  8. reginald R martin says:

    I used this after a surgery in 2012 when I had a blood clot so please add me.

  9. Robert says:

    add me

  10. Monica says:

    Add me.

1 2 3 11

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.