Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
Trinity Industries agreed to a $6 million class action lawsuit settlement to resolve claims ET-Plus guardrails were dangerous and defective.
The class action lawsuit settlement benefits Missouri counties with populations of 10,000 or more as of July 1, 2014, that have or had ET-Plus guardrail end terminal systems with 4-inch-wide feeder shoots installed on county-owned and -maintained roadways. The settlement includes the independent city of St. Louis and the state of Missouri’s transportation authority. Eligible counties will be determined by the Missouri Census Data Center.
The ET-Plus guardrail end terminal was designed to absorb the impact of crashes. However, these devices have been associated with defects and injuries. ET-Plus devices have been linked to fatal car accidents, including a Nov. 1 accident that claimed the life of a driver in Ohio, according to News 5 Cleveland.
According to a class action lawsuit against Trinity Industries, the manufacturer made changes to the ET-Plus guardrails’ design in 2005 without announcing the redesign or seeking approval.
However, these changes allegedly caused the Trinity Industries ET-Plus guardrails to be unsafe. The new design allegedly causes the ET-Plus devices to lock up during a crash. As a result, the guardrail doesn’t ribbon away from the vehicle and instead can puncture the vehicle, the class action lawsuit contends.
“As a result of Trinity’s design changes to the original ET-Plus, the modified ETPlus is defective, unsafe, and unreasonably dangerous when put to its reasonably anticipated use,” the ET-Plus class action lawsuit contends. “Malfunctions of the modified ET-Plus have caused serious injury and death on numerous occasions across the country, including within the State of Missouri.”
Trinity Industries hasn’t admitted any wrongdoing but agreed to a $6 million class action settlement.
Under the terms of the Trinity Industries guardrails class action lawsuit settlement, class members can be reimbursed for prior replacements of ET-Plus devices.
A total of $3.5 million from the settlement fund will be used for ET-Plus replacement reimbursements class members can also be reimbursed for the cost of ET-Plus location and identification; $2.5 million of the settlement total will be used to reimburse ET-Plus location and identification.
For the next six years, class members can have ET-Plus devices replaced by the settlement fund. According to the guardrail lawsuit settlement agreement, class members can receive $1,700 for each identified ET-Plus device to pay for removal and replacement.
Because the court previously certified this class action lawsuit, class members can no longer exclude themselves.
The court granted the Trinity guardrails settlement final approval Aug. 30, 2022.
There are several claim deadlines depending on the type of benefits being sought.
For claims for the cost of locating ET-Plus devices, class members must submit a claim form by Jan. 9, 2023.
For claims for previous ET-Plus replacements, class members must submit a valid claim form by Oct. 10, 2023.
Class members have until Oct. 9, 2028, to submit claims for replacement ET-Plus devices.
Who’s Eligible
Missouri counties with populations of 10,000 or more as of 07/01/2014, that have or had ET-Plus guardrail end terminal systems with 4-inch-wide feeder shoots installed on county-owned and -maintained roadways
Potential Award
ET-Plus devices replacement for the next six years
Proof of Purchase
No proof of purchase applicable
Claim Form
Claim forms were mailed to eligible class members. Please see your claim form for further information on submitting your claim.
NOTE: If you do not qualify for this settlement do NOT file a claim.
Remember: you are submitting your claim under penalty of perjury. You are also harming other eligible Class Members by submitting a fraudulent claim. If you’re unsure if you qualify, please read the FAQ section of the Settlement Administrator’s website to ensure you meet all standards (Top Class Actions is not a Settlement Administrator). If you don’t qualify for this settlement, check out our database of other open class action settlements you may be eligible for.
Claim Form Deadline
01/09/2023 for claims for the cost of locating ET-Plus devices
10/10/2023 for claims for previous ET-Plus replacements
10/09/2028 for replacement ET-Plus devices
Case Name
Jackson County, Missouri v. Trinity Industries Inc, and Trinity Highway Products LLC, Case No. 1516-CV23684, in the Court of Jackson County, Missouri
Final Hearing
11/30/2022
Settlement Website
Claims Administrator
Trinity ET Plus Settlement
P.O. Box 2002
Chanhassen, MN 55317-2002
info@trinityetplussettlement.com
844-332-6770
Class Counsel
Patrick J Stueve
Bradley T Wilders
Alexander T Ricke
STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP
Defense Counsel
BARTLIT BECK LLP
SCHARNHORST AST KENNARD GRIFFIN PC
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
- All-Clad ‘dishwasher safe’ false advertising $4M class action settlement
- Make It Right Foundation poor construction $20.5M class action settlement
- Abbott Laboratories Similac formula false advertising $19.5M class action settlement
- Smashburger ‘double the beef’ false advertising $5.5M class action settlement
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2024 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
3 thoughts onTrinity Industries ET-Plus guardrails $6M class action settlement
Chicago should be added to this accident resulting in crash and guardrail went thru vehicle killing my friend
Add me please
Add me please