Status: In progress

Sparkman v. Comerica Bank, et al., Case No. 4:23-cv-02028-DMR

  • Deadline to file a claim: 12/11/2025
  • Proof of Purchase Required: No
  • Potential Individual Reward: 73% of the disputed claim amount
  • Total Settlement Amount: $2 million
  • Location
    • California

Status: In progress

Sparkman v. Comerica Bank, et al., Case No. 4:23-cv-02028-DMR

  • Deadline to file a claim: 12/11/2025
  • Proof of Purchase Required: No
  • Potential Individual Reward: 73% of the disputed claim amount
  • Total Settlement Amount: $2 million
  • Location
    • California

Status: In progress

Sparkman v. Comerica Bank, et al., Case No. 4:23-cv-02028-DMR

  • Deadline to file a claim: 12/11/2025
  • Proof of Purchase Required: No
  • Potential Individual Reward: 73% of the disputed claim amount
  • Total Settlement Amount: $2 million
  • Location
    • California

Status: In progress

Sparkman v. Comerica Bank, et al., Case No. 4:23-cv-02028-DMR

The Comerica Bank settlement benefits individuals who were issued a California Way2Go prepaid Mastercard and had their unauthorized transfer dispute denied for conflicting information.

  • Deadline to file a claim: 12/11/2025
  • Proof of Purchase Required: No
  • Potential Individual Reward: 73% of the disputed claim amount
  • Total Settlement Amount: $2 million
  • Location
    • California

Edited by: Top class Actions  |  September 10, 2025

Category: Legal News
Close up of Comerica Bank sign on the office building in downtown Long Beach, Los Angeles County, California, USA
(Photo Credit: JHVEPhoto/Shutterstock)

Comerica Bank and Conduent State & Local Solutions have agreed to a nearly $2 million class action lawsuit settlement to resolve claims they denied California Way2Go cardholder disputes involving unauthorized transactions.

The Comerica Bank settlement benefits individuals who were issued a California Way2Go prepaid Mastercard and had their unauthorized transfer dispute denied for conflicting information.

According to the class action lawsuit, Comerica Bank and Conduent State & Local Solutions violated the Electronic Funds Transfer Act and California law by denying California Way2Go cardholder disputes involving unauthorized transactions.

The California Way2Go card program is managed by Conduent State & Local Solutions, which is a subsidiary of Conduent Inc. The program provides prepaid debit cards to residents who receive government benefits, such as unemployment insurance, child support and other payments.

Comerica Bank is a financial institution that offers banking services to consumers and businesses.

Comerica and Conduent have not admitted any wrongdoing but agreed to this $1.956 million settlement to resolve the class action lawsuit.

Under the terms of the Comerica Bank and Conduent California Way2Go card settlement, class members can receive a cash payment based on the amount of their disputed claim.

According to the settlement website, class members can receive around 73% of the amount they disputed. For example, if a class member disputed a $1,000 transaction, they could receive around $730.

If any funds remain in the settlement after the first round of payments, a second round of payments will be distributed to class members who accepted their first payment.

The deadline for exclusion and objection is Nov. 10, 2025.

The final approval hearing for the Comerica Bank settlement is scheduled for Dec. 11, 2025.

No claim form is required to benefit from the settlement. Class members who do not exclude themselves will automatically receive a settlement payment.


Who’s Eligible

All California Way2Go cardholders who had their unauthorized transaction disputes denied for conflicting information since July 20, 2020.

Potential Award

73% of the disputed claim amount

Proof of Purchase

N/A

Update Address Form

NOTE: If you do not qualify for this settlement do NOT file a claim.

Remember: you are submitting your claim under penalty of perjury. You are also harming other eligible Class Members by submitting a fraudulent claim. If you’re unsure if you qualify, please read the FAQ section of the Settlement Administrator’s website to ensure you meet all standards (Top Class Actions is not a Settlement Administrator). If you don’t qualify for this settlement, check out our database of other open class action settlements you may be eligible for.

Exclusion and Objection Deadline

11/10/2025

Case Name

Sparkman v. Comerica Bank, et al., Case No. 4:23-cv-02028-DMR, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Final Hearing

12/11/2025

Claims Administrator

Sparkman v Comerica
c/o Settlement Administrator
P.O. Box 23680
Jacksonville, FL 32241
855-349-7023

Class Counsel

E. Michelle Drake
BERGER MONTAGUE P.C.

Beth E. Terrell
Blythe Chandler
TERRELL MARSHALL LAW GROUP PLLC

Daniel A. Schlanger
SCHLANGER LAW GROUP LLP

Defense Counsel

John C. Grugan
HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP

Jenny N. Perkins
BALLARD SPAHR LLP

Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.