Comerica Bank and Conduent State & Local Solutions have agreed to a nearly $2 million class action lawsuit settlement to resolve claims they denied California Way2Go cardholder disputes involving unauthorized transactions.
The Comerica Bank settlement benefits individuals who were issued a California Way2Go prepaid Mastercard and had their unauthorized transfer dispute denied for conflicting information.
According to the class action lawsuit, Comerica Bank and Conduent State & Local Solutions violated the Electronic Funds Transfer Act and California law by denying California Way2Go cardholder disputes involving unauthorized transactions.
The California Way2Go card program is managed by Conduent State & Local Solutions, which is a subsidiary of Conduent Inc. The program provides prepaid debit cards to residents who receive government benefits, such as unemployment insurance, child support and other payments.
Comerica Bank is a financial institution that offers banking services to consumers and businesses.
Comerica and Conduent have not admitted any wrongdoing but agreed to this $1.956 million settlement to resolve the class action lawsuit.
Under the terms of the Comerica Bank and Conduent California Way2Go card settlement, class members can receive a cash payment based on the amount of their disputed claim.
According to the settlement website, class members can receive around 73% of the amount they disputed. For example, if a class member disputed a $1,000 transaction, they could receive around $730.
If any funds remain in the settlement after the first round of payments, a second round of payments will be distributed to class members who accepted their first payment.
The deadline for exclusion and objection is Nov. 10, 2025.
The final approval hearing for the Comerica Bank settlement is scheduled for Dec. 11, 2025.
No claim form is required to benefit from the settlement. Class members who do not exclude themselves will automatically receive a settlement payment.
Who’s Eligible
All California Way2Go cardholders who had their unauthorized transaction disputes denied for conflicting information since July 20, 2020.
Potential Award
73% of the disputed claim amount
Proof of Purchase
N/A
Update Address Form
NOTE: If you do not qualify for this settlement do NOT file a claim.
Remember: you are submitting your claim under penalty of perjury. You are also harming other eligible Class Members by submitting a fraudulent claim. If you’re unsure if you qualify, please read the FAQ section of the Settlement Administrator’s website to ensure you meet all standards (Top Class Actions is not a Settlement Administrator). If you don’t qualify for this settlement, check out our database of other open class action settlements you may be eligible for.
Exclusion and Objection Deadline
11/10/2025
Case Name
Sparkman v. Comerica Bank, et al., Case No. 4:23-cv-02028-DMR, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Final Hearing
12/11/2025
Settlement Website
Claims Administrator
Sparkman v Comerica
c/o Settlement Administrator
P.O. Box 23680
Jacksonville, FL 32241
855-349-7023
Class Counsel
E. Michelle Drake
BERGER MONTAGUE P.C.
Beth E. Terrell
Blythe Chandler
TERRELL MARSHALL LAW GROUP PLLC
Daniel A. Schlanger
SCHLANGER LAW GROUP LLP
Defense Counsel
John C. Grugan
HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP
Jenny N. Perkins
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
- $6.94M Vending machine overcharge class action settlement
- Toyota Bluetooth Echo class action settlement
- Specialty Networks data breach class action settlement
- $1.5M Freestyle Solutions data breach class action settlement
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2025 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.