Status: In progress

Tyler, et al. v. Hennepin County, et al., Case No. 62-CV-19-6012

  • Deadline to file a claim: 06/06/2025
  • Proof of Purchase Required: Yes
  • Potential Individual Reward: Varies
  • Total Settlement Amount: $109 million
  • Location
    • Minnesota

Status: In progress

Tyler, et al. v. Hennepin County, et al., Case No. 62-CV-19-6012

  • Deadline to file a claim: 06/06/2025
  • Proof of Purchase Required: Yes
  • Potential Individual Reward: Varies
  • Total Settlement Amount: $109 million
  • Location
    • Minnesota

Status: In progress

Tyler, et al. v. Hennepin County, et al., Case No. 62-CV-19-6012

  • Deadline to file a claim: 06/06/2025
  • Proof of Purchase Required: Yes
  • Potential Individual Reward: Varies
  • Total Settlement Amount: $109 million
  • Location
    • Minnesota

Status: In progress

Tyler, et al. v. Hennepin County, et al., Case No. 62-CV-19-6012

Minnesota has agreed to a $109 million settlement to resolve claims that it failed to compensate property owners for surplus value when their properties were forfeited for nonpayment of property taxes.

  • Deadline to file a claim: 06/06/2025
  • Proof of Purchase Required: Yes
  • Potential Individual Reward: Varies
  • Total Settlement Amount: $109 million
  • Location
    • Minnesota

Edited by: Will Fritz  |  February 19, 2025

Category: Closed Class Actions

This settlement is closed!

Please see what other class action settlements you might qualify to claim cash from in our Open Settlements directory!

House model near Minnesota flag
(Photo Credit: BERMIX STUDIO/Shutterstock)

Minnesota has agreed to a $109 million settlement to resolve claims that it failed to compensate property owners for surplus value when their properties were forfeited for nonpayment of property taxes.

The Minnesota property tax settlement benefits anyone who held any ownership interest, lien or other security interest in a property that was forfeited to the state of Minnesota in the last several years for nonpayment of property taxes and for which there was surplus value.

The settlement covers properties in Hennepin County that were forfeited between Aug. 16, 2012, and Dec. 31, 2023; properties in St. Louis County that were forfeited between June 2, 2016, and Dec. 31, 2023; and properties in all other Minnesota counties that were forfeited between June 23, 2016, and Dec. 31, 2023.

The Minnesota forfeiture class action lawsuit claimed the state failed to compensate property owners for surplus value that existed when their properties were forfeited for nonpayment of property taxes. This allegedly caused financial damages to Minnesota homeowners.

In Minnesota, property taxes are generally administered at the county level. However, the Minnesota Department of Revenue may provide resources and administration on a state level.

The state of Minnesota hasn’t admitted any wrongdoing but agreed to pay $109 million to resolve these allegations.

Under the terms of the Minnesota property tax settlement, class members can receive up to 90% of the surplus value of their forfeited property, plus interest starting from the date of forfeiture. A property’s value at the time of forfeiture can be determined with a property’s sale price, the assessor’s estimated market value or an appraisal.

If multiple claims are made for an eligible property, the surplus value will be allocated among the claimants based upon their order of priority under Minnesota law.

Those who owned severed mineral rights for a property will receive $300 per parcel plus interest, while former lienholders will receive a settlement payment up to the amount of the lien value as of the date of forfeiture plus interest.

All settlement payments may be reduced on a pro rata basis depending on the number of claims filed.

The deadline to opt out of or object to the settlement was Nov. 8, 2024.

The final approval hearing for the Minnesota forfeiture settlement was scheduled for Dec. 16, 2024.

In order to receive a settlement payment, class members must submit a valid claim form by June 6, 2025.

Who’s Eligible

The settlement benefits those who held any ownership interest, including a valid lien or other security interest, in a parcel of real property or severed mineral rights that was forfeited to the state of Minnesota for nonpayment of property taxes during the following time periods:

  • Minnesota properties in all other counties forfeited between June 23, 2016, and Dec. 31, 2023
  • Hennepin County properties forfeited between Aug. 16, 2012, and Dec. 31, 2023
  • St. Louis County properties forfeited between June 2, 2016, and Dec. 31, 2023
Potential Award

Varies

Proof of Purchase

Deeds, mortgages, property tax statements, notices of assessment, trust documents, lien documents, etc.

Claim Form

NOTE: If you do not qualify for this settlement do NOT file a claim.

Remember: you are submitting your claim under penalty of perjury. You are also harming other eligible Class Members by submitting a fraudulent claim. If you’re unsure if you qualify, please read the FAQ section of the Settlement Administrator’s website to ensure you meet all standards (Top Class Actions is not a Settlement Administrator). If you don’t qualify for this settlement, check out our database of other open class action settlements you may be eligible for.

Claim Form Deadline

06/06/2025

Case Name

Tyler, et al. v. Hennepin County, et al., Case No. 62-CV-19-6012, in the Second Judicial District Court for Ramsey County, Minnesota

Final Hearing

12/16/2024

Settlement Website
Claims Administrator

Tyler v. Hennepin County
c/o Kroll Settlement Administration LLC
P.O. Box 5324
New York, NY 10150-5324
833-522-3374

Class Counsel

Charles R Watkins
David Guin
GUIN STOKES & EVANS LLC

Vildan A Teske
TESKE LAW PLLC

Garrett Blanchfield
Roberta A Yard
REINHARDT WENDORF & BLANCHFIELD

Defense Counsel

Liz Kramer
SOLICITOR GENERAL

Peter J Farrell
DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL

Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

5 thoughts on$109M Minnesota property tax forfeiture class action settlement

  1. Kory flatgard says:

    I made a claim by June 6th what else do I need to do? When and how will payment be made

  2. Brandy cole says:

    Add me please

  3. Benjamin Johnson says:

    ADD Me

  4. Michelle Schmitt says:

    This is absurb! I live in Minnesota. So what about those of us who don’t have much money but still paid our property taxes? Not only that, but one year I had to pay $300 something extra! What about us? Hmmm?

    1. Heather says:

      I think you might have misunderstood what this is. Say someone didn’t pay their property taxes on a $20,000 piece of land for whatever reason (poverty, coma, accident, dementia). Say the amount owed was about $1,000. The state took the property & auctioned it off to pay that $1,000 & KEPT THE REST in profit. This is just paying the property owner back what they illegally stole. You aren’t owed anything here for doing what you were supposed to. You got to keep your property. It’s the law that any balance after the bill is paid goes to the original landowner. The state ignored that law & kept the money. That’s why they lost a huge lawsuit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.