Newborn baby boy covered in vertix inside incubatorAn Illinois mother has filed a dangerous drug lawsuit against the manufacturer of Zofran, alleging the popular morning sickness treatment caused her son to be born with serious birth defects.

Plaintiff Michelle F., mother of S.F., began taking the pharmaceutical Zofran (ondansetron) as prescribed by her doctor for morning sickness, according to the Zofran birth defects lawsuit

Michelle began taking the drug in the first trimester of her pregnancy and continued using it through her third trimester. Five months after her son S.F. was born, he was diagnosed with a ventricular septal defect.

Commonly known as a “hole in the heart,” this defect occurs in the wall of the heart that separates the lower chambers. Instead of being kept separately, the blood passes through the hold from the right to the left side of the heart, and the oxygenated blood is pumped to the lungs rather than to the body, making the heart work harder.

As a result of this congenital defect, S.F. cannot fully participate in the activities that other children can, such as playing sports or roughhousing, and is held back from fully participating in life.

He also experiences emotional difficulties not experienced by his older siblings, and has severe developmental delays, including the need to wear a diaper at night at six and a half years old.

Michelle states if she or her physicians were aware that there was an increased risk in birth defects as a result of taking Zofran, she would not have taken the drug and her son would not have been born with birth defects.

The Zofran birth defects lawsuit further alleges that the drug maker’s fraudulent marketing of the drug was misleading and led Michelle and her physicians to believe the medication was safe to use during pregnancy for the treatment of nausea, morning sickness and vomiting.

Michelle brings counts of negligence, strict products liability, design defect, failure to warn, breach of express and implied warranty, fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation, violation of the Illinois Deceptive Trade Practices Act and loss of consortium. She is seeking statutory, direct and consequential damages, fees and costs.

Zofran History of Use

Zofran is only FDA approved to treat the most severe nausea caused by chemotherapy and radiation treatments. It was approved in 1991 for this use.

According to Michelle’s Zofran birth defects lawsuit, the medication has been marketed “off label” since the beginning of 1998 as a safe, effective treatment of morning sickness despite any studies ever being conducted on pregnant women.

Additionally, in the 2000s, Zofran became the most commonly prescribed drug for pregnant women to treat nausea in the U.S. These women blindly trusted that the drug was safe and had no way of knowing that it was not tested for safety in pregnancy.

Decades before in the 1980s, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), the maker of Zofran, conducted animal studies on the drug and they showed intrauterine deaths, toxicity and malformations in offspring, and that the active ingredient in the drug crossed the placental barrier and exposed fetuses to the drug.

These Zofran birth defects have been reported by women who have taken the drug to treat morning sickness during pregnancy. Later GSK found in another study that Zofran crossed the human placenta and exposed the fetus to high concentrations of the drug but did not disclose this to women or their physicians.

Zofran Birth Defects Lawsuit Information

In 2012, GSK settled a federal, civil false claim lawsuit alleging GSK had promoted Zofran for the treatment of morning sickness in pregnant women despite being approved only for post-operative nausea, and that GSK had paid doctors kickbacks for prescribing Zofran. In 2012, GSK settled that lawsuit along with three similar lawsuits regarding other GSK products for $1.043 billion.

If you or someone you love was prescribed Zofran during pregnancy and had a baby born with a heart defect or other birth defect, you may be entitled to legal compensation.

The Zofran Birth Defects Lawsuit is Case No. 3:15-cv-00902 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

Do YOU have a legal claim? Fill out the form on this page now for a free, immediate, and confidential case evaluation. The birth defect attorneys who work with Top Class Actions will contact you if you qualify to let you know if an individual Zofran lawsuit or Zofran class action lawsuit is best for you. [In general, Zofran lawsuits are filed individually by each plaintiff and are not class actions.] Hurry — statutes of limitations may apply.

Learn More

Get Help – It’s Free

Join a Free Zofran Birth Defects Class Action Lawsuit Investigation

If you or someone you know took Zofran while pregnant and had a baby with a birth defect, you or this person may have a legal claim. See if you qualify by filling out the short form below.

A Zofran birth defect attorney will contact you if you qualify to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you.

Oops! We could not locate your form.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.