 A woman has filed a lawsuit alleging her bank violated escrow account rules.
A woman has filed a lawsuit alleging her bank violated escrow account rules.
Plaintiff Yong Jun Choi alleges Nationstar Mortgage LLC, doing business as Mr. Cooper, violated the laws of New York and 13 other states by not paying interest on money held in escrow accounts. She cites escrow account rules in New York that mandate that homeowners be paid interest on fund placed into escrow accounts for property located in the state of New York at a minimum rate of two percent annually.
Choi claims she bought a single-family home in Glenn Cove, New York on May 12, 2016. At that time, her mortgage loan was with Nationstar’s predecessor-in-interest Guaranteed Rate Inc. Nationstar allegedly purchased Choi’s mortgage in June 2016.
Alleged Violations of Escrow Account Rules
Choi alleges she did not receive any accrued interest on her escrow account either from Guaranteed Rate or from Nationstar from the time she purchased her home until she sold it on Aug. 30, 2017. During that time period, she alleges she made “substantial escrow payments totaling thousands of dollars in addition to her regular monthly principal and interest mortgage payments as a form of pre-payment of property tax and insurance.”
As a result of not paying Choi any interest on her escrow funds, Guaranteed Rate and Nationstar allegedly were in violation of escrow account rules.
According to Choi’s lawsuit, Nationstar is accused of profiting off the funds held in her escrow account, which generated float income for the mortgage company. The lawsuit indicates float income is defined as “revenue from the investment of funds held by Nationstar.”
Choi’s proposed Class would include fellow plaintiffs in 14 states who were victims of similar violations of escrow account rules by Nationstar doing business as Mr. Cooper. The affected states are New York, California, Connecticut, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont and Wisconsin.
As the third largest residential mortgage servicer in the U.S., Nationstar has more than three million customers. Choi says Class Members can be identified by Nationstar’s own records.
Choi also alleges that Nationstar knowingly and willfully violated the laws by refusing to pay interest on her escrow account and those of other homeowners. By allegedly breaking New York’s escrow account rules, Nationstar enriched its own financial position at the expense of homeowners, which Choi claims “constitutes unlawful, unfair, and deceptive business acts and practices.”
Choi’s mortgage escrow lawsuit alleges that in order to break escrow account rules and escape detection of such violations, Nationstar sent periodic “Escrow Account Disclosure” statements and mortgage statements to Choi and other Class Members. These statements allegedly did not accurately show the amount of money the homeowners were due in connection with their escrow accounts, because the statements did not indicate the interest Nationstar was required to pay on those escrow accounts.
Instead, the statements allegedly were knowingly and intentionally designed to falsely assure homeowners that Nationstar was properly managing the escrow accounts by making sure any excess funds in escrow were returned to the homeowners. Nationstar allegedly intentionally withheld interest from the homeowners in violation of escrow account rules, and never alluded to the interest in any statements received by the homeowners.
According to Choi’s lawsuit, “the form statements and accompanying literature that Nationstar sends or makes available to homeowners is replete with misleading information …”
The Escrow Account Rules Lawsuit is Yong Jun Choi v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, d/b/a Mr. Cooper, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
Join a Free Mortgage Escrow Account Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
Mortgage borrowers in certain states whose lenders required them to pre-pay their property taxes or property insurance through an escrow account and who did not receive interest on those escrowed funds may qualify to join this mortgage escrow account class action lawsuit investigation.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2025 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
 
								

 
							 
							 
							 
							 
							 
							 
							 
							 
							 
							 
							 
							
16 thoughts onWoman Alleges Nationstar Violated Escrow Account Rules by Neglecting to Pay Interest
Add me please!
Add me please
I WOULD LIKE TO JOIN THIS LAWSUIT!!! I purchased my home in August 2019. My loan was sold to Nationstar/ Mr. Cooper less than 3 months later. My mortgage payment was 1770.00 per month at closing. I did an FHA Streamline modification with Mr. Cooper in August of 2020. My interest rate was lowered to 2.75% from 4.25% and my new mortgage payment was lowered to 1384.00. I was refunded 700.00 after the modification due to a surplus in my escrow account. After paying the agreed upon amount of 1384.00 for 6 months, I received an escrow analysis statement showing that I now had an 8k shortage in my escrow account and my mortgage payment was now going to be 1918.00 per month. I called Mr. Cooper requesting an explanation and found that they used the previous homeowners taxes on my loan even after I and my county sent them the correct amount of my taxes. Even after admitting they made a mistake they would not re-write the loan. Mr. Cooper then made me pay the higher rate while they sorted out the issue and investigated how it happened. I was also still responsible for all late fees and I sent them the previous escrow surplus back from the closing of my original loan. I was now in a situation were my newly modified loan that included a lower interest rate was now costing me more than it was when I closed on my home the prior year.
I asked them to re-write the loan or remove the shortage from my escrow account to which I was advised it was too late. It was only after I filed a complaint with the bbb and cfpb did Mr. Cooper decide to credit my account the difference between the 1385.00 and 1918.00 monthly payment, AGAIN,ONLY IF I CALL THEM.
As a result of their negligence my mortgage payment on my credit report shows 1918.00 which is eating into my available income by over 500.00 a month. I went to purchase a vehicle and was told I couldn’t get financing at a lower interest rate because of the debt to income based on my mortgage payment reporting the full amount of 1918.00, even though I am only paying the amount I agreed to of 1385.00. In addition to this there have been times they said they applied the credits to my account but didn’t and then I had to make the full payment to keep from accruing fees or showing a late payment on my credit report. If the full amount isn’t paid every month I’m at risk of foreclosure (for a payment higher than I agreed too) and the only option they are willing to entertain is a refinance. HOW IS THIS LEGAL!!!
They suggest I refinance my home to fix a mistake on a loan that I didn’t make. I also called the fha and reported this to them. They were no help at all. It’s now been a full year and they are still putting a band-aid on this mess. I can’t seem to find an attorney that sees the potential value in sticking it to these guys and getting paid from the damages, and I can’t even afford to sue them without jeopardizing my ability to pay my mortgage.. please help!!!
I will join law suit