By Christina Spicer  |  March 21, 2018

Category: Consumer News

wolfWolf Appliance Inc. has been hit with a second class action over alleged defects in its ovens.

Lead plaintiff Frederick I. Sharp alleges in his class action lawsuit that the blue porcelain interior of the high-end appliances are prone to chipping, cracking, and crazing during regular use.

In addition to ruining the appearance of the ovens, the plaintiff claims that food can be contaminated by chips of the interior porcelain.

Sharp says he purchased an E Series double wall-oven from Wolf in his home state of New York. He claims that after three short years, the oven showed signs of cracking, chipping, and/or crazing after he ran the self-clean function. Although the oven cavity was replaced, alleges the plaintiff, it again cracked after he used the self-cleaning function.

“As a result of the Defect, the Ovens do not satisfy several of the key purposes for which they were purchased, i.e.: (1) cooking food without damaging the Ovens’ interior; (2) self-cleaning the Ovens without causing damage to the oven interior; (3) maintaining the purity of the Ovens’ interiors, including Wolf’s signature aesthetics; and (4) cooking food and self-cleaning the oven without the risk that porcelain flakes or pieces will be dislodged from the oven cavity and expose users to having the porcelain chips blown around and onto food contained in the Ovens,” the Wolf ovens class action lawsuit states.

According to the class action lawsuit, Wolf ovens range from approximately $4,000 to more than $17,000. They include built-in ovens, “dual fuel” and induction ranges, as well as gas ranges. The plaintiff alleges that Wolf knew of the defect that made its oven interiors prone to cracking since 2008, but failed to rectify the problem or warn consumers.

Sharp says that he and other consumers would not have purchased Wolf ovens if they had known the interior was prone to cracking, or they would not have paid as much.

This is not the first class action to hit Wolf over alleged defects in the high-end appliances. Last summer, a Pennsylvania man alleged that Wolf’s signature cobalt blue porcelain interiors were prone to cracking, despite advertising touting the material as extremely durable.

The Wolf ovens class action lawsuit alleges counts of fraudulent concealment, breach of implied warranties, violations of New York General Business Law, and unjust enrichment.

The plaintiff seeks to represent both a New York Class and a nationwide Class of consumers who purchased Wolf ovens containing a porcelain cavity.

Sharp is seeking statutory, compensatory, and punitive damages on behalf of himself and potential Class Members as well as a court order declaring Wolf’s actions improper and deceptive and requiring Wolf to conduct a corrective advertising campaign.

The plaintiff is represented by Mark S. Reich, Vincent Serra and Samuel Rudman of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP.

The Wolf Defective Oven Class Action Lawsuit is Sharp v. Wolf Appliance Inc., Case No. 1:18-cv-01723, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

59 thoughts onWolf Ovens Class Action Lawsuit Alleges Self-Cleaning Defect

  1. Connie Benjamin says:

    I own a Wolf 48” Dual Fuel double oven with blue porcelain enamel interiors. The bottom of both ovens have crazing and missing patches and spots of enamel that have come off. I complained about this when it started to go bad to no avail. I will gladly speak to a lawyer. Clearly this is not indicative of the description of this $14k appliance. I do not use self-cleaning, because a technician told me that the high temperature could adversely affect the workings of my unit.

  2. Lisa Maloney says:

    Sign me up too! We bought an M series in 2020 and it’s doing the same thing. I don’t even think it happened during the self clean mode as I only have done that once or twice. I was so excited to get my “dream” oven and am now super disappointed and feel like Wolf is just going to give us the run around.

  3. Florence A Chaffin says:

    Sign me up, too! I have had inside replaced twice. Never use self cleaning, never use convection in case of glass splinters circulating. In fact, I know have a small toaster over that I use 95% of the time now just in case. VERY BAD for such an expensive machine!!
    I have asked why they don’t just fix the problem. The last customer service boss told me it is because they sell so many of them, it is worth it to just replace the ones from complainers instead of getting rid of the blue inside. That is NOT a company I want to be associated with any more!!

1 4 5 6

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.