By Anne Bucher  |  August 24, 2022

Category: Discrimination
Exterior of a Walmart store.
(Photo Credit: Sundry Photography/Shutterstock)

Walmart verdict overview:

  • Who: Walmart was hit with a $4.4 million jury verdict for allegedly racially profiling a customer.
  • Why: The jury found Walmart liable for continuing to employ a loss prevention employee with a reputation for making false police reports.
  • Where: The Walmart racial profiling lawsuit was filed in Oregon circuit court.

Walmart Inc. is faced with a $4.4 million verdict for allegedly racially profiling and calling the police on a customer, according to Aug. 19 court documents.

The Walmart lawsuit, which was filed in December 2021, alleged that Walmart customer Michael Mangum, who is African American, was shopping for a light bulb when loss prevention employee Joe Williams racially profiled him.

Mangum says Williams ordered him to leave the store over his objections that he had done nothing wrong, then called the police to report that he “had a person refusing to leave.”

Williams allegedly told the non-emergency dispatch operator that Mangum “started flipping out on me” when he walked by. Police arrived at the Walmart but declined to take action against Mangum, partially because Williams had a reputation for making false reports about shoppers, according to the lawsuit.

Walmart discrimination lawsuit says retailer knew of employees’ reputation for making false reports

The Walmart discrimination lawsuit states that Walmart was aware that Williams had previously provided false information about customers to police.

A 2019 Oregon law (ORS 30.845) allows individuals to seek civil damages against employees who, acting within the scope of their employment, cause police officers to arrive with the intent to unlawfully discriminate against the individual, violate their constitutional rights, cause them to feel harassed or humiliated, cause them to be expelled from a place where they are lawfully located or damage their reputation or standing in the community.

Because Williams was allegedly known to provide false information to police, Walmart was aware that he was likely to engage in conduct that would violate this law, Mangum argued.

He says that, due to the discrimination he experienced, he continues to suffer from embarrassment, fear and humiliation.

The Walmart discrimination lawsuit asserted claims for violations of ORS 30.845, negligent supervision or retention and discrimination. Mangum sought $4 million in punitive damages from Walmart, plus $400,000 in noneconomic damages.

Friday’s Walmart verdict grants the maximum $4.4 million Mangum sought.

Walmart has already faced numerous class action lawsuits this year, including a shelf pricing class action lawsuit that accuses the retailer of misrepresenting the price customers will actually have to pay at checkout. 

What do you think about the Walmart verdict? Join the discussion in the comments!

Mangum is represented by Gregory Kafoury, Jason Kafoury, and Mark McDougal of Kafoury & McDougal.

The Walmart discrimination lawsuit is Michael Mangum v. Walmart Inc., et al., Case No. 20cv18273, in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon, County of Multnomah.


Don’t Miss Out!

Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!


Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

25 thoughts onWalmart to pay $4M in consumer discrimination lawsuit

  1. Donna White says:

    Add me I have been shopping there weekly for years

  2. Scott Heizey says:

    I went to Walmart to return an item. While in line at customer service, it watch customer after customer take their returns to the desk, get their money back and walk out happily. The moment I arrived to the desk for my turn, it felt to me like the atmosphere just up and changed and my receipt was scrutinize to the letter. The serial number of the product was worn off on the box. They accused me of tampering with the security number even though they never took that item out of the box to check the serial number on the protect itself. Mind you, I’m a homeless while male whom just rode many miles to that store so I was looking a bit rough but that shouldn’t cause me to receive different treatment than anyone else. After riding all that way, standing in like l line watching other nice looking customers receive the service they expected before me and after me, I was not appreciating the love I was receiving. I threatened to protest at their front door but continued to be told no even though they never properly checked the item to confirm if that was the right package. The serial number is not printed in receipts. They could have just compared them using their systems. Me, still irritated to the max, went and purchase markers and a poster board and write on the sign sign that they are discriminating based off appearance. Next thing I know the cops show up and I’m being 86st from the store for life. I always spend nearly my entire check at that store every month. That’s more that $15,000 a year they just lost out on. I needed to know. Do I have a case. I don’t have a phone since I’m homeless but I have a number that can be called to leave a message and an email I can have emails sent to so please use those and I will contact you back as quickly as I can. Please, let me know. I don’t feel I should have been treated in this manner and it complicated my relationship with the police far more than it should have considering I rely on them for my safety due to being homeless. So now I’m getting lesser treatment from the police because they think I’m a troublemaker now. Please, let me know ASAP.
    Thank you

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.