A truck accident lawsuit was recently settled between a driver of commercial truck and an injured driver of a personal vehicle for $1.375 million. The truck accident lawsuit was filed by Harvey S. in Bergen County, N.J.
Harvey, a former commercial truck driver himself who is now disabled and not likely to be able to return to this type of employment, was allegedly rear-ended on June 1, 2015.
According to an article about the truck accident lawsuit published in the New Jersey Law Journal on June 29, 2018, Harvey was driving his car on Route 80 near Wayne, Ind. when the accident occurred. An employee of Landscape Works based in Hackensack, New Jersey, Joseph S., allegedly rear-ended the car in a company-owned truck.
Kenneth Elwood of Blume, Forte, Fried, Zerres & Molinari in Chatham, N.J. represented the injured Harvey S. as counsel in the truck accident lawsuit—although it didn’t go to trial. According to Mr. Elwood, Harvey suffered severe spinal and shoulder injuries as a result of the accident.
Harvey’s alleged injuries most affected his neck at the C4 to C6 vertebrae, according to the New Jersey Law Journal. Images provided by the plaintiff’s counsel revealed disc profusion and spinal stenosis—painful conditions requiring ongoing intervention and management.
Harvey S. chose to pursue chiropractic care as well as physical therapy in pursuit of his recovery from these injuries. As an adjunct but necessary part of his treatment, he says he also received injections for pain management.
In mid-August 2015, the plaintiff was getting one of these injections in his cervical spine to control the pain but had a bad reaction to it. The treatment caused him to suffer oxygen deprivation by bringing on respiratory arrest. Harvey was hospitalized for a full month afterwards.
According to the article, Harvey suffers lasting physical consequences as a result of the respiratory arrest which would’ve never happened if he hadn’t been rear-ended by Joseph S. He purportedly has ongoing issues with his sense of balance and his gait is affected as well. Counsel argued that both of these problems are prohibitive to him returning to his job as a commercial truck driver.
Harvey S., according to report, has been subjected to a rehabilitative process and several sessions of physical therapy but the residual problems remain. He is now 51-years-old and, if he is able to return to employment at all, he will need to be retrained in another field of work.
Both plaintiff and defendant opted to go to mediation overseen by a former Superior Court Judge in Wayne, Indiana. The former judge—Anthony Graziano—works for Vivino and Vivino. The mediation resulted in the $1.375 million settlement between the two parties.
Join A Free Truck Accident Lawsuit Investigation
Truck accidents can result in serious injuries to drivers and their families. A truck accident lawsuit can recover damages to compensate victims and families for associated costs and damages.
If you or a loved one were involved in a truck accident and sustained injuries and damages, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit. Fill out the form on this page for a free case evaluation.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2025 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
Get Help – It’s Free
Join a Free Truck Accident Lawsuit Investigation
If you qualify, an attorney will contact you to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you.
PLEASE NOTE: If you want to participate in this investigation, it is imperative that you reply to the law firm if they call or email you. Failing to do so may result in you not getting signed up as a client or getting you dropped as a client.
E-mail any problems with this form to:
[email protected].
Oops! We could not locate your form.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
Counsel responsible for this advertisement includes Robert Blanchard at:
Levin, Papantonio, Thomas, Mitchell, Rafferty & Proctor, P.A.
PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT: THIS WEB PAGE IS AN ADVERTISEMENT AND THE PARTICIPATING ATTORNEY(S) ARE INCLUDED BECAUSE THEY PAY AN ADVERTISING FEE. It is not a lawyer referral service or prepaid legal services plan. Top Class Actions is not a law firm. Top Class Actions does not endorse or recommend any lawyer or law firm who participates in the network, nor does it analyze a person’s legal situation when determining which participating lawyers receive a person’s inquiry. It does not make any representation and has not made any judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating lawyer. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The information contained herein is not legal advice. Any information you submit to Top Class Actions does not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be protected by attorney-client privilege. Do not use the form to submit confidential, time-sensitive, or privileged information. All photos are of models and do not depict clients. All case evaluations are performed by participating attorneys.