Trader Joe’s class action lawsuit overview:
- Who: Plaintiff Mario Palacios filed a class action lawsuit against Trader Joe’s Company.
- Why: Palacios claims Trader Joe’s falsely advertises its 100% Juice Organic Freezer Pops as being made entirely from juice when they contain non-juice ingredients.
- Where: The class action lawsuit was filed in California state court.
A new class action lawsuit alleges Trader Joe’s falsely advertises its 100% Juice Organic Freezer Pops as being made entirely from juice when they contain non-juice ingredients.
Plaintiff Mario Palacios claims Trader Joe’s misleads consumers by labeling the product as “100% Juice” when it actually contains non-juice ingredients, such as water, natural flavors, malic acid, guar gum and vegetable juice used as coloring.
Palacios argues the labeling is misleading because it gives the false impression that the product is made entirely from expressed juice without concentrates, water or other additives.
“Trader Joe’s—a grocery chain that has built its consumer reputation on the sale of organic, minimally processed, and unadulterated food products—intentionally uses font, placement, color and type size as relates to the required disclosure to give this false impression and deceive and mislead consumers,” the Trader Joe’s class action lawsuit says.
Trader Joe’s labeling violates federal regulations, lawsuit says
Palacios argues Trader Joe’s labeling violates federal regulations that require products labeled as “100% Juice” to disclose any added ingredients in a manner that “accompanies” the juice claim.
The class action lawsuit alleges the disclosure on the Trader Joe’s product is placed far from the “100% Juice” claim, in a small and largely unreadable font.
Palacios argues consumers are willing to pay a premium for products labeled as “clean” or “natural,” and that Trader Joe’s has capitalized on this trend by misleadingly labeling its freezer pops.
He claims he would not have purchased the product, or would have paid less for it, had he known it contained non-juice ingredients.
Palacios claims Trader Joe’s is guilty of violating California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act and of unjust enrichment and breach of implied warranty. He demands a jury trial and requests declaratory and injunctive relief and an award of attorneys’ fees and costs.
In a separate Trader Joe’s class action lawsuit from 2024, a consumer accused the company of selling bagels labeled as gluten-free that were not actually gluten-free according to lab testing.
Were you misled by Trader Joe’s labeling of its 100% Juice Organic Freezer Pops? Let us know in the comments.
The plaintiff is represented by Charles C. Weller of Charles C. Weller APC.
The Trader Joe’s freezer pops class action lawsuit is Palacios v. Trader Joe’s Company, Case No. 2:25-cv-10584, in the California Superior Court for Los Angeles County.
Don’t Miss Out!
Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
- Class action accuses Hilton of sending false urgency spam to Washington consumers
- Another NordVPN class action lawsuit challenges company over automatic renewal charges
- Class action claims Clorox, Hamilton Beach falsely marketed air purifiers as HEPA
- Princeton University sued over data breach exposing alumni, donor information
10 thoughts onTrader Joe’s class action alleges ‘100% juice’ freezer pops contain non-juice ingredients
Add me
shame on trader joe add me
Please add me.
No wonder why my pet experience the same symptoms please add me
Please add me, I purchase this product. Thank you.
Ad me.
Add me
I would like to join any settlement or class action suit against Bayer for Seresto flea and tick collars. 2 of my beloved pets had to be euthanized due to neurological issues and pain and suffering they endured. I have proof the collar was the sole reason for their demise. I still have the collars that ended their life. Although we spent thousands of dollars at vets, animal hospitals, chiropractors, for medicines, tests, and examinations to cure the issues they were having. There was no conclusion of the symptoms. Until I saved the collars they were wearing! I placed them in ziploc bags knowing that I would soon need another fur baby in my life. I had never been without one. I found one soon after cause I couldn’t live with the emptiness of my home without one. Due to the high price of the said collars. I immediately wanted to protect my new dog from flea and ticks. So I put one of the collars on from my. Deceased pets. Within days my new pet was experiencing the same symptoms as my prior dog. After some serious mind searching as to why this was happening again.thinking it must be something in my home. The only apparent and logical reason would be flea collar. Immediately removed it.and although it took about a week, all of the symptoms subsided and he is fine! I still have the collars, medical records,and have been preaching the lack of information the company informed anyone of on how harmful these are.and didn’t want anyone else to have their beloved pets taken from them due to this product!
I say open a lawsuit you lost your pets and that’s the ultimate no no
Thanks