By Sarah Mirando  |  October 3, 2012

Category: Legal News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Class Action Lawsuit Settlement News!

Nestle BOOST Class Action Lawsuit Dismissed Despite FTC Settlement

By Kimberly Mirando

 

BOOST Kid EssentialsNestlé has managed to get a false advertising class action lawsuit concerning its BOOST children’s drink dismissed, despite settling with the FTC over the same false ad charges.

The FTC reached the Nestle BOOST false advertising settlement in February 2011 after charging the company with making false and misleading ad claims that its BOOST Kid Essentials drinks with probiotics boosted children’s immune systems, prevented certain illnesses, sped up recovery and reduced their school absences.

Under the FTC BOOST settlement, Nestle agreed to stop making these advertising claims unless they are approved by the Food and Drug Administration and/or backed by competent and reliable scientific evidence.

Soon after the Nestle BOOST settlement was reached, multiple class action lawsuits were filed against the company alleging false advertising.

U.S. District Judge Faith S. Hochberg dismissed the consumer false ad class action lawsuit (Scheuerman v. Nestle Healthcare Nutrition, Inc.) on the grounds that the Plaintiffs’ failed to provide sufficient evidence for their false or misleading statement claims.

Instead of proving that Nestle lacked scientific evidence to support the advertising claim that BOOST Kid Essentials is “clinically shown” to provide the advertised health benefits, the Plaintiffs merely criticized the strength of Nestlé’s scientific support and could only show that the claims were not convincing or significant.

Nestle submitted over 40 scientific articles and studies to substantiate its “clinically shown” ad claims.

“Plaintiffs’ experts and its other facts all boil down to a claim that Nestle’s scientific support underlying its claim of ‘clinically shown’ health benefits is not as strong as it should be and do not substantiate those claims,” Judge Hochberg wrote. “While Plaintiffs’ experts take issue with the strength and significance of these studies, their criticisms do not satisfy Plaintiffs’ burden of demonstrating that the ‘clinically shown’ advertising claims are false or misleading.”

The case is Kurt Scheuerman, et al. v. Nestle Healthcare Nutrition, Inc., Case No. 10-cv-03684-FSH-PS,  U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey.

 

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

 

Updated October 3rd, 2012

 

All class action and lawsuit news updates are listed in the Lawsuit News section of Top Class Actions

LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2012 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.