By Amanda Antell  |  December 7, 2016

Category: Legal News

IVC-filter-pretrial-conferenceUnited States Magistrate Tim A. Baker has recently ordered an IVC filter pretrial conference for the ongoing multidistrict litigation (MDL) against Cook Medical.

The IVC pretrial filter conference took place on Nov. 10, 2016, where both parties appeared before Judge Baker.

The IVC filter pretrial conference discussed the discovery process, possible settlement solutions, and other related matters.

During this IVC filter pretrial conference, Cook Medical agreed to provide the plaintiffs “complaint listing detail” forms, a spreadsheet, and additional information to plaintiffs for relevant complain files for production.

However due to the differences in the parties’ settlement position, the IVC filter pretrial conference did not produce any potential settlement resolutions.

Judge Baker stated the issue will be revisited in early 2017, where another IVC filter pretrial conference will hopefully be more successful in producing potential settlement resolutions.

Overview of IVC Filter Complications

The Cook Medical MDL pertains to the IVC filter complications patients allegedly suffered while using the companies inferior vena cava filters.

Patients had these devices implanted in their inferior vena cava, the largest vein in the body, to prevent blood clot attacks. These devices are designed to trap and resolve blood clots that form in the legs and pelvis, preventing them from traveling to the lungs and heart.

IVC filters can either be made for permanent or temporary placement, giving patients the choice of having the device later explanted. Patients alleged the temporary models were poorly made, and would either break apart or become dislodged from the implant site.

Cook Medical and several other manufacturing companies allegedly made the temporary models out of inferior components, which would later malfunction inside the patients, according to lawsuit claims.

The FDA first warned against IVC filter complications in August 2010, warning doctors that temporary IVC filters could compound the patient’s condition. In the agency’s warning, at least 900 IVC filter injury reports were submitted to the FDA.

One of the most commonly reported injuries associated with IVC filter complications included the device breaking apart, and the device perforating and migrating away from the implant site.

An updated FDA warning was released in May 2014, the agency stated temporary IVC filters should be removed between 29 and 54 days after the blood clot risk is resolved.

Even though this is vital safety information for patients, Cook and other manufacturing companies allegedly failed to warn patients about this information.

Patients are suing Cook Medical for multiple counts of negligence and failure to warn, as well as concealing important product safety information.

The Cook IVC Filter MDL is Cook Medical, Inc. IVC Filters. Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2570, in the U.S. District Court of Southern Indiana, Indianapolis Division.

In general, IVC filter lawsuits are filed individually by each plaintiff and are not class actions.

Do YOU have a legal claim? Fill out the form on this page now for a free, immediate, and confidential case evaluation. The attorneys who work with Top Class Actions will contact you if you qualify to let you know if an individual lawsuit or class action lawsuit is best for you. Hurry — statutes of limitations may apply.

Learn More

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


Get Help – It’s Free

Join a Free IVC Filter Class Action Lawsuit Investigation

If you or a loved one were injured by IVC filter complications, you may have a legal claim. See if you qualify to pursue compensation and join a free IVC filter class action lawsuit investigation by submitting your information for a free case evaluation.

An attorney will contact you if you qualify to discuss the details of your potential case.

Please Note: If you want to participate in this investigation, it is imperative that you reply to the law firm if they call or email you. Failing to do so may result in you not getting signed up as a client, if you qualify, or getting you dropped as a client.

Oops! We could not locate your form.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.