Steven Cohen  |  February 18, 2020

Category: Beverages

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Coke and ice in glassA California federal judge has partially certified a class action lawsuit filed against The Coca-Cola Co. by consumers who say Coke’s “no artificial flavors” labels are misleading.

U.S. District Judge Jeffrey S. White ruled that each Class in the multidistrict litigation lawsuit has the status to seek an injunction, which would require the company to change its labeling.

The Coca-Cola class action lawsuit was filed by Coke drinkers who claim the brand misleads the public by advertising that the drink is free of artificial flavors and chemical preservatives. 

According to the plaintiffs, Coca-Cola shows phosphoric acid as one of the ingredients on the labels of Coke products. The consumers allege that Coca-Cola omitted that the ingredient is used as an artificial flavor and chemical preservative.

Numerous class action lawsuits against the beverage company were consolidated into In re: Coca-Cola Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation (No. II) in 2014. In July 2016, the judge denied a motion by Coca-Cola to put the class action lawsuit on hold, denying a stay in the proceedings.

In June 2017, plaintiffs in the consolidated class action sought Class certification, arguing that Coca-Cola arranged a misleading marketing campaign where they claimed the product did not contain artificial flavors or preservatives.

Allegedly, consumers argue that the phrase “No artificial flavors. No preservatives added. Since 1886” is an affirmative misrepresentation because phosphoric acid is a preservative as well as an artificial flavor.

The consumers in this case claim that Coca-Cola violates all three prongs of California’s Unfair Competition Law, California’s False Advertising Law and California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act.

In addition, the case notes that numerous Coke buyers have filed common law claims for negligent misrepresentation, negligence, unjust enrichment, money had and received, and breach of express warranty.

Judge White denied the motion related to the common law claims filed by the plaintiffs, stating they did not address the elements of those claims for each jurisdiction.

“Plaintiffs have not demonstrated that any damages awarded on these common law claims would be ‘incidental’ to the injunctive relief they seek,” Judge White writes.

Coca-Cola argues that because each plaintiff is now fully aware how phosphoric acid is used by Coke, they cannot show an impending threat that they will be deceived in the future.

However, the buyers argue that the defendants could stop using phosphoric acid in their Coke product, but Coca-Cola argues that this will be unlikely, as the ingredient has been used in the beverage for more than a century.

The plaintiffs sought certification for six Classes made up of individuals in California, Illinois, New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts and Florida who “purchased Coca-Cola’s Coke product within [those states] that: (1) lists phosphoric acid on the ingredients list but does not state that the product contains artificial flavoring and chemical preservatives; (2) includes the label statement no artificial flavors. no preservatives added. since 1886.; and/or (3) includes the label statement original formula.”

Did you purchase Coke thinking there was no artificial flavors in the product? Leave a message in the comments section below.

The plaintiffs are represented by John W. Barrett and Richard Barrett of Barrett Law Group PA; Keith M. Fleischman, Joshua D. Glatter and June Park of Fleischman Law Firm PLLC; and Ben F. Pierce Gore of Pratt & Associates.

The Coca-Cola Artificial Flavor Class Action Lawsuit is In re: Coca-Cola Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation (No. II), Case No. 4:14-md-02555, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Read More Lawsuit & Settlement News:

How Much Has the New Jersey Catholic Church Paid for Victim Abuse?

One New York Catholic Priest Abuse Case Settles

Ford Defective Brakes Class Action Gets Trimmed

American Eagle TCPA Settlement Checks Mailed

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


1,115 thoughts onCoca-Cola ‘No Artificial Flavors’ Lawsuit Gets Partial Class Cert.

  1. Joyce Marie Scott says:

    Thank you foor providing this service to consumers, Top Class Action, you are doing a great job
    I am asking to be added to this lawsuit, its outrageous how people/consumers are mislead and
    taken advantage of for profit by large and small corporations, alike.

  2. Cynthia Toet says:

    Add please

  3. DREAMA A DANIEL says:

    Add me please. Coca-Cola mislead consumers and they should pay for their actions.

  4. Andy R says:

    Yep, add me as well. Tks

  5. Gina says:

    Please add me

  6. Demetria says:

    Please add me

  7. Renee says:

    Please add me. This is all I drink for years

  8. Angela jackson says:

    Add me

1 100 101 102

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.