A group of Cutco knife sales representatives who went through mandatory unpaid training sessions have been awarded a $6.7 million settlement.
U.S. District Judge Edward M. Chen certified the FLSA collective action as well for employees in five states. He granted the plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval of the $6.7 million settlement.
Vector Marketing Corp allegedly violated the Fair Labor Standards Act and state laws in California, Florida, Illinois, Michigan and New York by mandating unpaid training.
Vector required recruits to take 15 hours of unpaid training over the course of three days so that they could learn how to sell Cutco kitchen merchandise through in-home demonstrations.
The plaintiffs say the recruits should be classified as employees according to FLSA and California state laws. As employees, they would be entitled to be paid for their hours spent in the training program.
However, according to Vector’s web site, all sales reps are independent contractors, NOT employees.
In California, a large factor in determining whether a person is an employee or an independent contractor is the amount of control the employer demonstrates over the worker.
By making the three-day period of unpaid training a requirement, Vector exhibits control over the worker’s schedule for three days. This belies the contractor title.
Vector’s Unpaid Training
Vector is a direct-selling company that allows people to sell kitchen knives and other products directly to consumers. Court papers state the company gives recent high school graduates and college students the chance to sell these items after they finish the company’s initial training, which is unpaid time.
Recruits are asked to create lists of potential customers and to schedule appointments with those people after the training period is over. No recruits are allowed to sell Cutco knives while still in the midst of their training period.
Approximately 4,500 people in the U.S. are included in the FLSA collective class because they either attended all three days of Vector’s training program or attended part of the program and provided a list of personal contacts during the training.
Vector took the stance that everyone who completed the unpaid training was then eligible to become a Vector sales representative.
Vector also has claimed that their turnover is so high that nearly 50 percent of their representatives never make a sale, nor do they continue making sales after just ten days. The company might fear losing money if the company has to start paying for the recruits’ unpaid training.
The plaintiffs claim they qualified as employees under the FLSA and were entitled to minimum wage pay during training.
The Cutco Unpaid Training Class Action Lawsuit is Woods et al. v. Vector Marketing Corp., Case No.: 3:14-cv-00264, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Join a Free California Overtime, Wage & Hour Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
If you were forced to work off the clock or without overtime pay in California within the past 2 to 3 years, you have rights – and you don’t have to take on the company alone.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2025 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
Get Help – It’s Free
Join a Free California Wage & Hour Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
If you were denied overtime, breaks, or minimum wage by your employer in California, you may have a legal claim. Fill out the form below for more information.
An attorney will contact you if you qualify to discuss the details of your potential case.
Please Note: If you want to participate in this investigation, it is imperative that you reply to the law firm if they call or email you. Failing to do so may result in you not getting signed up as a client, if you qualify, or getting you dropped as a client.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT: THIS WEB PAGE IS AN ADVERTISEMENT AND THE PARTICIPATING ATTORNEY(S) ARE INCLUDED BECAUSE THEY PAY AN ADVERTISING FEE. It is not a lawyer referral service or prepaid legal services plan. Top Class Actions is not a law firm. Top Class Actions does not endorse or recommend any lawyer or law firm who participates in the network, nor does it analyze a person’s legal situation when determining which participating lawyers receive a person’s inquiry. It does not make any representation and has not made any judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating lawyer. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The information contained herein is not legal advice. Any information you submit to Top Class Actions does not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be protected by attorney-client privilege. Do not use the form to submit confidential, time-sensitive, or privileged information. All photos are of models and do not depict clients. All case evaluations are performed by participating attorneys.