Patients needing anticoagulant therapy have a handful of drugs to choose from. However, the new generation anticoagulants have been allegedly inducing numerous serious bleeding complications in patients, without a readily available bleeding antidote.
The blood thinner Eliquis is the most recent addition to these options. Eliquis was approved by the FDA in 2012. It was released as a joint effort between Pfizer and Bristol Myers.
Eliquis is commonly prescribed to patients suffering from atrial fibrillation, who may be at a higher risk for stroke. Anticoagulants are a popular treatment option in general for patients who are susceptible to blood clotting. These patients may be at risk of stroke or other blood clot injuries.
These new anticoagulants were developed to offer alternatives to the much older drug warfarin. Warfarin requires patients to frequently see their doctors for dose adjustments.
Warfarin also has a readily available reversal agent in case of internal bleeding. But the blood thinner Eliquis and some other new generation anticoagulants do not have a bleeding antidote readily available.
While the single daily dosage make the blood thinner Eliquis and other new generation anticoagulants popular among patients, the lack of a reversal agent has caused major concern in the medical community.
Bleeding Complications Related to Blood Thinner Eliquis
Like other anticoagulants, the blood thinner Eliquis works by inhibiting the body’s clotting mechanism. However, these medications also impair the body’s ability to recover from internal bleeding complications, which often need emergency intervention to treat.
It is important to note that the ability to recover from internal bleeding problems was a prevalent concern since Pradaxa’s release in 2010, when patients reported needing hospitalization. Xarelto received similar criticism soon after, with Johnson & Johnson and Bayer HealthCare still facing litigation.
Other new anticoagulants have been the subject of massive amounts of product liability litigation, much of it directed at manufacturers Johnson & Johnson and Bayer HealthCare.
FDA approval for the Eliquis blood thinner was delayed over concerns that the trial results had been tampered with to increase the chances of FDA approval.
In fact, critics state that the Eliquis clinical trials, known as the ARISTOTLE trials, lacked sufficient reports of potential complications and accused the trial administrators of violating practice guidelines.
Plaintiffs in Eliquis litigation allege that even with all these concerns surrounding the Eliquis blood thinner, Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb have failed to adequately warn patients against internal bleeding complications.
Do YOU have a legal claim? Fill out the form on this page now for a free, immediate, and confidential case evaluation. The Eliquis attorneys who work with Top Class Actions will contact you if you qualify to let you know if an individual lawsuit or Eliquis class action lawsuit is best for you. [In general, Eliquis lawsuits are filed individually by each plaintiff and are not class actions.] Hurry — statutes of limitations may apply.
Get Help – It’s Free
Join a Free Eliquis Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
If you or a loved one took Eliquis (apixaban) and suffered injuries such as uncontrollable internal bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, hemorrhaging, kidney bleeding or death, you may have a legal claim. See if you qualify by filling out the short form below.
An attorney will contact you if you qualify to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you.
Please Note: If you want to participate in this investigation, it is imperative that you reply to the law firm if they call or email you. Failing to do so may result in you not getting signed up as a client, if you qualify, or getting you dropped as a client.
Oops! We could not locate your form.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2025 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.