The plaintiffs in a class action lawsuit alleging that the public transit agency in San Francisco uses a mobile app to track usersโ locations have proposed an injunctive settlement in federal court.
According to the class action lawsuit, San Franciscoโs Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) obtained the unique identifiers associated with mobile phones. Then, alleged the plaintiff, BART would check in on the location of users from time to time.
โSpecifically, plaintiff alleged that when the BART Watch App was downloaded onto usersโ cell phones, the app secretly collected the phoneโs unique International Mobile Equipment Identity (โIMEIโ) number and geolocation information without usersโ consent,โ states the motion for the proposed settlement in the BART illegal spying class action lawsuit.
While the plaintiffโs attorney and the plaintiff will recoup fees and an incentive award, the primary goal of the BART Watch App illegal spying class action lawsuit was to obtain injunctive relief, according to the motion for approval of the settlement agreement.
โBART has agreed that when a BART Watch App user submits a โreport,โ it will not obtain or collect any โInternational Mobile Equipment Identityโ numbers, and will only obtain or collect a limited set of information as laid out in the Settlement Agreement,โ notes the motion for preliminary approval of the BART class action settlement agreement.
Under the terms of the BART Watch App illegal spying class action lawsuit settlement, the agency will stop collecting mobile phone identifiers. Further, the terms of the settlement do not prohibit Class Members from pursuing BART for monetary damages resulting from the action.
โCrucially, plaintiff obtained this important injunctive relief under the proposed settlement without releasing any of the settlement class membersโ claims for monetary relief, meaning class members retain the right to bring suit against defendant for the full extent of any damages they believe they are entitled to for the conduct alleged in this case,โย states the motion for approval of the BART Watch App illegal spying class action lawsuit settlement.
According to the BART class action lawsuit, although the free app introduced by the transit agency in 2014 was convenient, providing traffic alerts and police notifications, it also compiled personal information about users, including their location.
The plaintiff alleged that BART, along with the app developer, had violated the Californiaโs Cellular Communications Interception Act, along with privacy rights of Californians provided by the stateโs constitution.
Under the terms of the BART Watch App illegal spying class action lawsuit settlement, the attorneys for the plaintiff will receive $57,500 in fees and costs. The plaintiff will receive a $2,500 incentive award as well.
Class Members include all who signed up for the BART Watch App after Jan. 1, 2016 and had their cell phone or other mobile devicesโ geolocation collected by the agency.
The plaintiffย is represented by Rafey Sarkis Balabanian and Todd M. Logan ofย Edelson PC.
Theย BART Watch App Illegal Spying Class Action Lawsuitย isย Pamela Moreno v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-02911, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Oakland Division.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
ยฉ2008 โ 2024 Top Class Actionsยฎ LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.