By Top Class Actions  |  February 17, 2026

Category: False Advertising
Laundry basket with baby clothes and crochet toy
(Photo Credit: New Africa/Shutterstock)

Arm & Hammer baby detergent class action overview:

  • Who: Plaintiff Davontaya Johnson filed a class action lawsuit against Church & Dwight Co. Inc.
  • Why: Johnson alleges Church & Dwight falsely advertises its Arm & Hammer hypoallergenic baby detergent products as being hypoallergenic.
  • Where: The class action lawsuit was filed in California state court.

A new class action lawsuit accuses Church & Dwight of falsely advertising its Arm & Hammer hypoallergenic baby detergent products as being hypoallergenic.

Plaintiff Davontaya Johnson claims Church & Dwight’s Arm & Hammer hypoallergenic baby detergent products contain fragrance chemicals that can cause allergic reactions and skin irritations.

Johnson argues Church & Dwight’s alleged misrepresentations about its Arm & Hammer hypoallergenic baby detergent products have caused consumers to pay a premium for the products.

“By deceiving consumers about the nature of its products, the defendant is able to take away market share from competing products and increase its own sales and profits,” the Arm & Hammer class action lawsuit says.

Arm & Hammer class action: Consumers rely on hypoallergenic label

Johnson wants to represent a California class of consumers who purchased Arm & Hammer hypoallergenic baby detergent products during the applicable statute of limitations period.

She claims Church & Dwight is guilty of violating California’s Unfair Competition Law, False Advertising Law and Consumers Legal Remedies Act.

Johnson demands a jury trial and requests declaratory and injunctive relief and an award of compensatory, exemplary and statutory damages for herself and all class members.

Similarly, Unilever United States Inc. faced a class action lawsuit alleging it falsely labeled its Vaseline-brand Baby Healing Jelly as hypoallergenic despite containing fragrance chemicals that can cause allergic reactions.

Have you ever purchased Arm & Hammer hypoallergenic baby detergent products? Let us know in the comments.

The plaintiff is represented by Michael D. Braun of Kuzyk Law LLP and Jeffrey I. Carton and Steven R. Schoenfeld of Denlea & Carton LLP.

The Arm & Hammer class action lawsuit is Johnson v. Church & Dwight Co. Inc., Case No. 5:25-cv-02409, in the California Superior Court for San Bernardino County.


Don’t Miss Out!

Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!


Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

2 thoughts onArm & Hammer class action alleges baby detergent falsely advertised as hypoallergenic

  1. Victoria Longstreet says:

    Yes, I’ve purchased Vaseline-brand Baby Healing Jelly

  2. Helen Maggard says:

    Add me Please

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.