By Heba Elsherif  |  December 5, 2017

Category: Labor & Employment

Depositphotos_3931021_xl-2015A class action lawsuit investigation is looking into alleged wage and hour violations conducted against California Praxair delivery drivers.

Praxair is a company that specializes in delivering industrial gases and chemicals to businesses throughout the United States. Because Praxair products are considered dangerous, a Praxair delivery driver must stay with the truck the entire time while on delivery.

This requirement to continuously stay with the truck causes conflicts with federal and state wage and hour laws which require employees including Praxair delivery drivers to receive proper rest and meal breaks. California labor law additionally mandates this requirement.

Meal Breaks and Other Wage and Hour Requirements

Wage and hour laws under the state of California are stricter and offer additional protection for employees than wage and hour laws mandated under federal law. Praxair delivery drivers may fall under the protection of California state wage and hour laws.

California law provides an array of protections to make sure employees get a reasonable amount of break time on the job. If an employee has worked more than 5 hours, 30-minute meal breaks are required. For every 4 hours worked, 10 minute rest breaks are required, and for every 3.5 hours worked a rest break is required.

Employees may be given two 30-minute breaks if more than 10 hours have been worked. Time spent off the clock for employees can be spent in however and whatever way they choose–they cannot be made to work during meal breaks. If a meal break is not given, workers should be compensated for one hour of work.

Although Praxair delivery drivers are not working in the same location each day, they are still entitled and protected under state and federal wage and hour laws. Some changes between the regulations of these laws may be made upon mutual agreement between the employee and employer. Otherwise, meal breaks are and protected right that should be offered to every Praxair delivery driver.

A class action lawsuit investigation is looking into possible wage and hour and meal break violations by Praxair.  Former employees who have worked as Praxair delivery driver have initiated the class action lawsuit investigation.

These drivers have complained that they were essentially not given required and proper meal breaks and rest breaks, among other legal requirements.  An experienced attorney can help employees determine if bringing a lawsuit is right for them.

Join a Free California Delivery Driver Class Action Lawsuit Investigation

If you were denied minimum wage, overtime and breaks as a delivery driver in California, you have rights – and you may be entitled to compensation.

Get a Free Case Evaluation Now

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


Get Help – It’s Free

Join a Free California Delivery Driver Class Action Lawsuit Investigation

If you were denied overtime, breaks, or minimum wage by your employer in California as a delivery driver, you may have a legal claim. Fill out the form below for more information.

An attorney will contact you if you qualify to discuss the details of your potential case.

Please Note: If you want to participate in this investigation, it is imperative that you reply to the law firm if they call or email you. Failing to do so may result in you not getting signed up as a client, if you qualify, or getting you dropped as a client.

Oops! We could not locate your form.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

E-mail any problems with this form to [email protected]

PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT: THIS WEB PAGE IS AN ADVERTISEMENT AND THE PARTICIPATING ATTORNEY(S) ARE INCLUDED BECAUSE THEY PAY AN ADVERTISING FEE. The attorney in charge of this advertisement is Ron Marron. Top Class Actions is not a lawyer referral service or prepaid legal services plan. Top Class Actions is not a law firm. Top Class Actions does not endorse or recommend any lawyer or law firm who participates in the network, nor does it analyze a person’s legal situation when determining which participating lawyers receive a person’s inquiry. It does not make any representation and has not made any judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating lawyer. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The information contained herein is not legal advice. Any information you submit to Top Class Actions does not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be protected by attorney-client privilege. Do not use the form to submit confidential, time-sensitive, or privileged information. All photos are of models and do not depict clients. All case evaluations are performed by participating attorneys.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.