Last week, a $2.2 million settlement that would end the class action lawsuit accusing CitiMortgage Inc. of improperly charging interest on mortgages for members of the military was approved by a South Carolina judge.
Lead plaintiff Raymond Wray alleges in his class action lawsuit that CitiMortgage adopted administrative polices and procedures when calculating interest rates for service members that violated the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA). The plaintiff alleges that CitiMortgage used a subsidy to charge him interest in excess of the mortgage rates required under the SCRA while he served as a member of the military and therefore he lost equity in his home.
CitiMortgage argues that the allegations were false. The company contends that its method of calculating the 6 percent interest cap fell within the SCRA statute and claims that the plaintiff had reduced his principal balance faster under CitiMortgage’s subsidized program. However, CitiMortgage’s arguments were shot down in 2013. A federal judge ruled that the plaintiff’s claims were feasible and refused to dismiss the class action lawsuit.
The plaintiff and CitiMortgage reached the proposed settlement agreement in March of this year. In it, the parties proposed that each of the 4,300 Class Members receive a $150 award each. The settlement will total $2.2 million. CitiMortgage must also agree not to return to the method of subsidizing interest rates for the next two years or to employ any other method “that would be less beneficial to its borrowers,” according to the class action settlement agreement.
Last week, U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie approved the agreement. The CitiMortgage class action settlement will apply to thousands of service members who own homes across the nation. “The court finds the [settlement] was reached in good faith, based on arms’ length negotiations, and following substantial discovery and lengthy adversary proceedings,” Judge Currie wrote in the order. “There is no evidence of collusion between the parties. The court, therefore, finds that the proposed settlement is procedurally fair.”
Representatives for the Class also indicate that the settlement agreement will not disqualify military members from receiving relief under the Department Of Justice’s expansive 2012 settlement with CitiMortgage over widespread accusations that the bank’s mortgage practices violated federal law.
In February, the Justice Department revealed to the public that unlawfully foreclosed-upon military service members will receive a collective $123 million from a total of five banks that participated in the $25 billion settlement agreement with the federal government.
Wray is represented by Richard A Harpootlian and Christopher P Kenney of Richard A. Harpootlian Law Office.
The CitiMortgage Class Action Lawsuit is Raymond Wray v. CitiMortgage Inc., Case No. 3:12-cv-03628-CMC, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina, Columbia Division.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2025 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
One thought on CitiMortgage’s $2.2M Settlement with Service Members Approved
We have a mortgage with Citimortgage that was assumed from a bulk transaction purchase between them and Principal mortgage.in 2003. I am a writing to you to inquire as to your services. CITI removed me from the mortgage and note when they assumed the bulk transaction. I tried numerous times to acquire the note and get back on the mortgage but was denied because it advised that they don’t do double wide mobile home/ land deals. I have also told City numerous times that the home sits across two pieces of property and I has the property surveyed to correct the issue but city wouldn’t accept the survey to release the land that belonged to another landowner Maryann Bauer. My husband filed Bankruptcy in 2013 and i was not notified until after complete that my credit was affected due to a second mortgage and we were separated at the time. This land originally belonged to mother and now city is trying to take her land too. He now has the property in foreclosure with sale date 11/17/15 and CITI says that there is nothing I can do. This cant be the first time CITI has done this. My son and I occupy the home and we are both disabled and he is in a wheelchair since birth in 1988. We dont know what to do. Would you please help. The land address is 15184 Shangri La Rd Duncanville AL 35456 and 15184 Shangri La Rd Duncanville AL 35456 which is Mrs Bauer’s (mothers) also the land and home was refinanced in 2002 for 67k and now we owe 49k but the property value at 130k per CITI apprasal which is where they assume mothers home is 15184 and the one behind is 15182. That is incorrect because it is reversed. our home is behind 15182. Would you please help?