Paul Tassin  |  May 9, 2017

Category: Consumer News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

expediaTwo hotel operators have joined forces in a false advertising class action lawsuit against the travel booking website Expedia.

The hotel operators claim that defendant Expedia Inc. and several of its affiliated travel booking websites have been unlawfully luring hotel customers by using a “bait and switch” tactic.

According to the hotels’ consolidated class action complaint, Expedia draws in potential customers using advertisements of bargains at the plaintiffs’ hotels – even though the plaintiffs have no arrangement with Expedia to offer such deals. Expedia then diverts these lured-in customers to offers by its own affiliated hotels, the plaintiffs claim.

Despite Expedia’s alleged advertisement of the plaintiffs’ hotels, they claim they have no business relationship with Expedia at all. The hotels say they do not reveal their vacancies to Expedia and that they do not accept reservations through Expedia.

The plaintiffs point out that Expedia was fined €367,000 in 2011 when members of a French hotel and restaurant association accused the company of falsely advertising reduced rates at their hotels and of showing their available hotel rooms as being booked.

Plaintiff Buckeye Tree Lodge and Sequoia Village Inn LLC began this false advertising class action lawsuit in August 2016. Buckeye alleged Expedia falsely told its customers that no rooms were available at Buckeye hotels and instead suggested reservations at competitor hotels.

Buckeye’s claims were narrowed down in January of this year by U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria. The judge dismissed Buckeye’s claims for unjust enrichment as well as intentional and negligent interference with prospective economic advantage, but allowed Buckeye to amend its pleadings to cure the defects in those claims.

The judge allowed Buckeye to proceed on its claims under the Lanham Act and the California Business and Professions Code.

In March, Judge Chhabria consolidated Buckeye’s claims with similar claims by co-plaintiff 2020 O Street Corporation Inc., which runs The Mansion on O Street in Washington, D.C.

Buckeye and 2020 O Street are now seeking to represent a plaintiff Class that would cover all hotels and similar services whose names appeared on Hotels.com, Expedia.com or Orbitz.com, and who did not have a booking agreement with the defendants.

The Class would also include hotels who did have a booking agreement with the defendants to sell a limited number of rooms and whose names continued to appear on the defendants’ websites even after the specified number of rooms were sold.

The plaintiffs are asking the court to award damages, disgorgement of profits related to the alleged false advertisement, court costs and attorneys’ fees, and any other relief the court deems proper.

The hotel operators are represented by attorneys Allison H. Goddard, James R. Patterson and Elizabeth A. Mitchell of Patterson Law Group, Pierce Gore of Pratt & Associates, Charles J. LaDuca, Joel Davidow and Alexandra C. Warren of Cuneo Gilbert & LaDuca LLP, and Tony C. Richa of Richa Law Group PC.

The Expedia Hotel Booking Class Action Lawsuit is Buckeye Tree Lodge and Sequoia Village Inn LLC, et al. v. Expedia Inc., et al., Case No. 3:16-cv-04721, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

UPDATE: On Oct. 11, 2017, a federal judge summarily did away with defendant Expedia Inc.’s attempt to limit the claims it’s facing, concluding that “[i]t’s not even a close question” whether the hotel plaintiffs have adequately pled their claims. Therefore, the Expedia hotel booking class action lawsuit will continue.

UPDATE 2: On Feb. 22, 2018, two hotels have filed a motion to certify a class action lawsuit accusing Expedia Inc., Hotels.com GP LLC and Orbitz LLC of engaging in a “classic bait and switch marketing scheme” by redirecting consumers to book reservations at hotels that are unaffiliated with the travel-booking sites, but which provide the companies with a cut of the booking.

UPDATE 3: On March 13, 2019, a federal judge partially certified a Class of hotel businesses that were allegedly harmed by Expedia redirecting customers to hotels that provide a cut of the booking to the travel reservation giant.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

11 thoughts onHotel Operators Join Expedia ‘Bait And Switch’ Class Action Lawsuit

  1. Mary Hennessy says:

    I booked with Expedia for the 31st of august this year to 2nd of September I tried to cancel. They have taken my money out of the account and will not give it back not even half of it. I was told the Hotel would not cancel even though I received a email from the hotel to ask Expedia to cancel. I spent over an hour and no satisfaction. Its 2 months away from that booking they could easily cancel it with a small fee.

  2. Sharon says:

    They did that to me I tried to get my money back and was refused . I had to go to my bank to order a stop payment

  3. Sharon says:

    This is so true I booked and it was a dump I tried to get my money back and was refused I had to go to bank to order a stop payment.

  4. mattie gregory says:

    pictures of hotels and room are false and if you want to go somewhere else they will only book you to a sister hotel more expenseive

  5. Dawn Morse says:

    I booked 3 nights with Expedia for spring break with my kids drove all night just to get to hotel and they had no rooms said they didn’t know why Expedia keeps over booking.

  6. Paula Barry says:

    i have booked hotel through them website showed hottub and pool no hottub at all and pool was closed

  7. John says:

    I have booked with Expedia numerous times.. I’m sure I’ve been involved with this case

  8. B Jones says:

    I stay at a hotel in Galveston and booked through Expedia and when I got there there price was twenty dollars more. I asked why she charged me more and she said that their price and that the price that Expedia had was not what they charge

    1. Bill Dahn says:

      Minnesota has issues with fire safety in many of these city’s here.The cover-ups for taking down Fire Lane sign so the
      Landfall City Councilman / City HRA Commissioner Violating the safety of all by parking a Pickup Truck & Speed Boat in the Fire Lane, plus putting charges on Bill Dahn for telling Washington County MN. Deputy Andrew Loehr # 165 was involved in Tasering a Landfall Native Man 31 in the back of His Head, Deputy Matt Wailand # 166 said He tried to pull it out and it wouldn’t come out, causing more brain damage attempting to conceal a unlawful Head Shot…
      I am here in Minnesota telling the Governments and Officials that All Lawmen that drive a City / Police Vehicle be Drug Tested.
      Unions stop such testing, saying it is un-Constitutional.
      Lol.
      Bill4Dahn@aol.com or Call 651-285-7657 ….

    2. brad says:

      how do i include myself in this action?

      1. HandymanRon says:

        Are you a hotelier? This suit is for them, not for the patrons. That would have to be a separate class-action suit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.