Sarah Mirando  |  April 19, 2013

Category: Consumer News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

GNC TriFlexGNC Corporation has been hit with a class action lawsuit accusing the nutrition company of falsely advertising that its dietary supplement TriFlex will promote mobility and flexibility, improve joint comfort and cushion joints.

California plaintiff Michael Lerma says GNC TriFlex, TriFlex Fast-Acting and TriFlex Sport products are promoted with a number of false advertising claims, including that they contain a “maximum,” “clinical strength” formula that supports “joint comfort,” promotes “joint mobility and flexibility” and “protects joints from wear and tear.”

In truth, he says, the TriFlex Products do none of this.

“Clinical studies have proven that the primary active ingredients in the TriFlex Products, glucosamine and chondroitin, are ineffective, taken alone or in combination with the other ingredients in the Products, with regard to the purported joint health benefits represented on the Products’ packaging and labeling,” the class action lawsuit says.

“Despite the vast weight of scientific evidence and clinical studies that definitively show the ingredients in TriFlex Products are ineffective,” GNC continues to convey to consumers that they have “maximum” and “clinical” strength formulas to promote mobility and flexibility, improve joint comfort, and cushion joints, the class action lawsuit continues.

Lerma says consumers who purchased GNC’s TriFlex Products were injured because “there is no other reason” for them to purchase the products other than to obtain the represented joint health benefits.

Lerma is seeking to represent a proposed class of persons in California and states with similar laws who purchased TriFlex Products from GNC. He is seeking restitution, injunctive relief, a corrective advertising campaign, and more.

The GNC TriFlex False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit case is Michael Lerma v. GNC Corp., Case No. 13-cv-00933, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California.

Lerma is represented by Elaine A. Ryan, Patricia N. Syverson, Lindsey M. Gomez-Gray and Manfred P. Muecke of Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint PC and Stewart M. Weltman of Stewart M. Weltman LLC.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


11 thoughts onGNC TriFlex False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit

  1. Christopher DEPPE says:

    add please..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.