Michael A. Kakuk  |  August 3, 2016

Category: Consumer News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

martha-stewart-living-magazineA class action lawsuit alleges that the companies behind the Martha Stewart Living magazine sold customer information without their knowledge or consent, in violation of Michigan privacy laws.

The Martha Stewart Living privacy class action lawsuit asserts that the defendants Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. and Meredith Corporation “supplement their sales and advertising revenues by secretly selling their statutorily protected information—including their full names, the title of the magazine they subscribed to, and home addresses…to data miners and other unrelated third party companies.”

In addition, the class action claims that the defendants “trade their subscribers’ Personal Reading Information with other data miners” to supplement their customer data with addition information like gender, age, and email addresses, “to increase the ‘street value’ of their customer lists and sell or trade them at a higher premium.”

The Martha Stewart class action complaint states that the data mining industry is vast, and companies frequently trade and sell customer information to each other to fuel a “$26 billion dollar per year online advertising industry in the United States.”

The complaint cites a report by the Federal Trade Commission that “data is currency” for businesses, which often share information in “database cooperatives.”

In these cooperatives, businesses pool their customer data, to try to get more information about individuals and make the data more valuable.

The Martha Stewart Living privacy class action lawsuit states that federal law, specifically the Video Privacy Protection Act, protects the video rental information of customers of “video tape service providers.”

The class action notes that Michigan law protections go further than the federal law, and seek to “preserve personal privacy with respect to the purchase, rental, or borrowing of certain materials,” such as magazines.

The Michigan law prohibits businesses from disclosing “a record or information concerning the purchase lease, rental, or borrowing of those materials by a customer that indicates the identity of the customer” to anyone except the customer.

Which is precisely what the class action complaint alleges Martha Stewart Living did to its customers.

Plaintiffs Alice Raden and Bobbie Moore each assert that they are Michigan residents who purchased a subscription to Martha Stewart Living magazine.

Though they claim they “never agreed in writing to allow Defendants to sell or disclose” their personal data, the magazine owners sold their information to data mining companies and other third parties.

Both plaintiffs contend that they received less than they paid for, and would not have purchased the magazine subscriptions had they known of defendants’ data selling practices.

Meredith Corporation recently paid $7.5 million to settle a class action lawsuit over similar allegations.

The plaintiffs in the Martha Stewart data mining lawsuit request that the Court certify a Class of “All Michigan residents who purchased a subscription to Martha Stewart Living magazine.”

Under the Michigan privacy law, the class action seeks restitution for the amount consumers were harmed or $5,000 per Class Member, whichever is greater. In addition, the complaint asks that the Court enter an order stopping the Martha Stewart Living owners from continuing to disclose customers’ private information.

The plaintiffs are represented by Ari J. Scharg and Benjamin S. Thomassen of Edelson PC; and Henry M. Scharg of the Law Office of Henry M. Scharg.

The Martha Stewart Living Privacy Class Action Lawsuit is Alice Raden, et al. v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc., et al., Case No. 4:16-cv-12808, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.

UPDATE: April 2019, the Michigan Martha Stewart Living magazine class action settlement is now open. Click here to file a claim.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

9 thoughts onMartha Stewart Living Class Action Alleges Privacy Violations

  1. Leila Newton says:

    I am a part of this lawsuit. When do you expect my check to come?

  2. Marie Barbagallo says:

    Please add me

  3. Reul Rebecca says:

    How do you file a claim by mail? I’m not seeing it. I live in Michigan and have had Martha subscriptions at two different addresses. I don’t understand why I didn’t get a claim number? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks

  4. Melissa says:

    Too bad this is just for Michigan residents only. I live in Massachusetts and my mail lady asked me what’s up with all the junk mail? I got a subscription to the magazine then within a week my mailbox has been getting so much junk mail. This is crazy.

    1. Annoyed in MA says:

      You could get the mail carrier reprimanded because it’s none of her business why you get so much mail. And maybe it’s junk mail but she shouldn’t be calling it junk mail. We have had a few mail carriers from hell that censor our mail and ask too many questions as well.

  5. Sandra says:

    I in Michigan receive booklets on a daily basses. Women clothing , men.s, this that and the other thing ! My mail even asked me what it was all about. well now I know.

  6. Atty Olsen says:

    Funny thing is I always wait for the magazine to be in my mail box. I read it cover to cover and yes I always get extra junk mails and ads for other magazines as well.
    I live in southern Nevada, so I don’t think it is only affected subscribers from Michigan, I wonder.

  7. Tammy Pierce says:

    I’ve had that magazine for several years and it’s funny the more this information is sold the more letters I seem to get in my mailbox “please be aware our systems have been breached and your information may or may not have been leaked. please destroy your card and here is a free year to life lock (oh yeah the people who do nothing until after you have been hacked and identity stolen and identity has to be assumed your identity totally not credit card numbers taken and used isn;t identity theft)

  8. GodFearingWoman says:

    Martha at it again?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.