By Sarah Mirando  |  January 31, 2012

Category: Legal News

Hearst CorporationA federal class action lawsuit claims Hearst Communications — the company behind such major publications as Cosmopolitan and Esquire magazines — collects and stores information about its subscribers and secretly shares it with third-party marketers, in violation of California law.

According to the Hearst Communications class action lawsuit, the publisher is violating the state’s “Shine the Light Law,” which protects consumers from companies that collect and surreptitiously share their sensitive personal information with third parties. The law requires businesses to establish a procedure by which customers can receive an explanation of how their personal information is disclosed to third parties.

“Shine the Light Disclosures are necessary because without knowledge of companies’ data sharing practices, consumers cannot make informed decisions about which businesses they should entrust with their personal information,” the class action lawsuit states.

“Despite the fact that Hearst profits by sharing its users’ personal information, it intentionally keeps its users in the dark on its information sharing practices by failing to make the Shine the Light Disclosures on its website. As a result, Hearst violates the Shine the Light Law by willfully denying its users an opportunity to exercise their legally proscribed rights under the Act.”

The Hearst class action lawsuit is brought on behalf of all California residents who have provided personal information to Hearst. It is seeking damages and civil penalties of $3,000 per violation of the law, in addition to injunctive relief prohibiting Hearst from engaging in the alleged wrongful conduct.

A copy of the Hearst Communications Class Action Lawsuit can be read here.

The case is Melissa Miller v. Hearst Communications, Inc., Case No. 12-cv-00733, U.S. District Court, Central District of California.

UPDATE: The Ninth Circuit struck down this class action lawsuit on Feb. 18, 2014, ruling the plaintiff lacked standing to pursue claims under California’s Shine the Light law.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


One thought on Hearst Communications Class Action Lawsuit

  1. Rustin says:

    I just bought a 2004 Ford F-250 super duty 6.0. I am not happy and would like to be part of this lawsuit. My head bolts keep working there way out and I have had to replace the injecters 2 twice. It is summer but it has been 42 degrees on some nights and come morning when I have to go to work I have problems with over heating in the first hour or so. Love Ford but very disappointed. I also have a GMC that is for the wife. Never have had problems with it. Not sure how to take the wife telling me I should have bought a GMC when I claim ford is the best yet my ford has broke down 10+ times more then her GMC.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.