Massachusetts has become the most recent state to file a misclassification lawsuit against Lyft and Uber. The lawsuit alleges that the ridesharing companies have misclassified employees as independent contractors, effectively denying them the rights ensured for employees including overtime and rest breaks. However, the ride-hailing companies and some workers have pushed back on state efforts to have these workers reclassified as employees, claiming it will threaten their way of doing business.
Massachusetts Misclassification Lawsuit
Massachusetts became the second state to file a misclassification lawsuit against the two ridesharing giants on Tuesday, July 14, the Verge reports. State officials, including Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, argue that Uber and Lyft have classified workers as contractors in order to take advantage of those workers.
โFor years Uber and Lyft have built their billion-dollar businesses on a model that exploits drivers,โ Healy said in a video announcing the suit. โUber and Lyft set the rates. They alone set the rules. Drivers are employees.โ
Healey has signaled that her office would be coming after companies that allegedly have been exploiting gig workers for some time. In March, the office filed an amicus brief which asked a federal judge to order these companies to reclassify their workers as employees immediately. Healy argues that such a reclassification could help stem the tide of the coronavirus by providing paid sick leave to these employees.
โThe bottom line is Uber and Lyft have gotten a free ride for far too long,โ the Verge reports Healey said on the day of the filing. โFor years these companies have systematically denied their drivers basic workplace protections and benefits, and profited greatly from it. This business is unfair and itโs also illegal under Massachusetts law.โ
California and Assembly Bill 5
California lawmakers rocked the gig economy when they passed Assembly Bill 5 (AB5) last year. The law, which went into effect this January 1, creates stricter guidelines for determining when workers can be classified as independent contractors. The law has faced considerable push back from companies that rely on the gig economy as well as workerโs groups representing independent truck drivers and others.
In May, city attorneys across California and Cali. Attorney General Xavier Becerra filed a misclassification lawsuit against Uber and Lyft regarding their classification of workers under AB5. More recently, Becerra filed a motion for a preliminary injunction that would require ridesharing companies to reclassify their workers within weeks.
Criticisms of Reclassification
Uber, Lyft, and other critics of the recent push for reclassification of gig workers claim that these workers donโt want to be classified as employees. They argue that reclassification would limit workersโ flexibility and control over their own work. This includes setting their own schedule and working for multiple apps.
โOur drivers consistently tell us that the reason why they value Uber is they value their freedom,โ Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi said in an earnings call held last year. โTheyโre their own boss. They run their own business.โ
Many of these companies have also begun arguing that state efforts to challenge current classifications are risking jobs during a pandemic.
โAt a time when Massachusettsโ economy is in crisis with a record 16 percent unemployment rate, we need to make it easier, not harder, for people to quickly start earning an income,โ Uber said in a statement reported by the Verge. โWe will contest this action in court, as it flies in the face of what the vast majority of drivers want: to work independently.โ
โThis lawsuit threatens to eliminate work for more than 50,000 people in Massachusetts at the worst possible time,โ Lyft said in a statement. โAcross the country, drivers have said they want to remain independent contractors over employment by a 4 to 1 margin.โ
What Reclassification Means for Workers
Employees are guaranteed a variety of rights and benefits that independent contractors arenโt. For example, employees are guaranteed a minimum wage, overtime pay, rest breaks, and employee benefits including health, life, and disability insurance. Employees also arenโt required to pay the same level of employment tax as contractors. In fact, there is a range of expenses that contractors pay which would otherwise be covered by an employeeโs employer.
If the Massachusetts misclassification lawsuit succeeds, the Verge reports that tens of thousands of Mass. drivers and gig workers could be eligible for these employee benefits. It also represents the next step in the fragmentation of the ridesharing industry with its inconsistency on worker classifications across states. The Verge reports that experts expect the added cost of the reclassification will likely be passed off on consumers.
Join a Free Uber Lyft Misclassification Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
If you are an Uber or Lyft driver (active or inactive), you may have been misclassified as an independent contractor, and you may qualify to join this Uber Lyft Driver Misclassification Class Action Lawsuit Investigation.
This article is not legal advice. It is presented
for informational purposes only.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
ยฉ2008 โ 2024 Top Class Actionsยฎ LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
2 thoughts onUber, Lyft Face Misclassification Lawsuit from Massachusetts AG
Add me
correcto tendremos seguro medico para que en caso de accidente nuestro seguro se haga responsable de la mayoria de los gastos