By Emily Sortor  |  April 30, 2019

Category: Labor & Employment

A $4.7 million class action settlement between Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. and workers has been struck, which will end claims that the company did not provide sufficient wage, meal, and rest breaks to workers, violating California labor law.

The deal was approved by U.S. District Judge Dean D. Pregerson in downtown Los Angeles. This approval was granted after a revision to the settlement deal was made, per Judge Pregerson’s request. According to Judge Pregerson, the original proposed deal was too “boilerplate,” and he requested more information to give his approval.

HR California notes that California labor law is among the most employee-friendly in the nation, and require more of employers to ensure their employee’s wellbeing while at work.  

The workers allegedly affected by Thermo Fisher’s policies expressed happiness of the new settlement deal that did receive approval, according to Law360. They said that it did a better job of outlining changes that will take place to better protect Thermo Fishers’ employees. Under the terms of the deal, employees will reportedly not be required to stay on their employer’s campus on their breaks.

The Class Members covered by the proposed settlement are all Thermo Fisher workers in California who are not exempt from overtime, who worked for the company at any point between March 6, 2013, and when the settlement deal was given preliminary approval. This class is around 3,500, according to estimates provided in the motion.

Per the approved deal, Thermo Fisher will reportedly “issue updated rest period policies as needed to eliminate any requirement that employees remain on site or on the employer’s premises during a rest period.”

Allegedly, Thermo Fisher’s old employee policy required employees to remain on campus, which allegedly amounted to dictating how they spent their breaks. Plaintiffs argued this policy was a violation of California labor law.

The Thermo Fisher wage and hour class action lawsuit was originally filed in two separate complaints. Their complaints were then consolidated into a single complaint against the biotechnology company.

According to those who filed the suit, Thermo Fisher for the past four years has made a practice of not paying employees for all hours worked, failing to give meal and rest breaks, and not paying overtime. They claim that these actions violate California’s unfair competition law, and violates the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004.

California’s Department of Industrial Relations notes that in California, employers are required to pay employees overtime if they are not classified as exempt.

Under the terms of the proposed settlement deal, the $4.7 million would be divided into payments for various parties. 25 percent of the settlement amount, around $1.2 million will be allocated for attorneys fees. $100,000 will be given to class members as civil penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004.

Of the $100,000, 75 percent will be paid to the Labor and Workforce Development Agency and 25 percent will be paid part of the net amount given to class members. Reportedly, the amount of the settlement that will be paid to class members is around $3.3 million.

The Thermo Fisher Wage and Hour Class Action Lawsuit is Case No. 5:17-cv-01918, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

Join a Free California Wage & Hour Class Action Lawsuit Investigation

If you were forced to work off the clock or without overtime pay within the past 3 years in California, you have rights – and you don’t have to take on the company alone.

Get a Free Case Evaluation Now

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


3 thoughts on$4.7M Settlement To Ends Claims That Fisher Scientific Inc. Violates California Labor Law

  1. Jason says:

    What if i was through a temp agency around that time i didnt get a check but my friend did.

    1. Jason Rosas says:

      Who was hired on did

  2. Glen Barbieri says:

    What if I was required to work in California 5 days a month but live in illinois

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.