Bumble class action lawsuit overview:
- Who: Plaintiffs Christine Johnson and Diane Foster filed a class action lawsuit against Bumble Trading LLC.
- Why: Johnson and Foster allege that Bumble discriminates against straight women by requiring them to initiate contact with straight men they match with, denying them the ability to be pursued by their matches.
- Where: The Bumble discrimination class action lawsuit was filed in Riverside County Superior Court in California.
A new Bumble class action lawsuit alleges the dating app’s “first move” feature discriminates against straight women by requiring women who match with men to initiate contact with them, even if they do not wish to make the initial contact.
Men and women with non-heterosexual matches are able to initiate contact, but women who match with heterosexual males are denied the opportunity to be contacted by the men they match with, plaintiffs Christine Johnson and Diane Foster say.
The plaintiffs claim the Bumble app’s “first move” feature is based on stereotypes and discriminates based on gender and sexual orientation.
“Specifically, as a means of attempting to justify the discrimination, defendants portray females as perpetual victims needing special emotional and psychological protection … from an entire class of people – heterosexual males – based on inaccurate, stereotypical depictions of men as rude, sexually-forward ogres who are all incapable of communicating with women in a polite and respectful manner,” the plaintiffs say.
Bumble dating app disempowers straight women, plaintiffs allege
Johnson and Foster claim the “first move” feature disempowers women because it takes away their choice and prevents them from being contacted by heterosexual men who match with them. They say they are uncomfortable making the first move and want men they match with to be able to initiate contact.
“Many, if not most, heterosexual women who match with men online want to be pursued, not to be the pursuers,” they allege.
Other dating apps allow any user to initiate contact when matched, according to the Bumble class action lawsuit.
Both plaintiffs claim they were interested in using the Bumble’s matchmaking services but ultimately decided not to because of the allegedly discriminatory policy preventing heterosexual men they matched with from initiating contact.
The plaintiffs allege Bumble treats consumers unequally based on their sex in violation of California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act.
Bumble recently settled a class action lawsuit alleging its dating app violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act.
Do you think the Bumble dating app “first move” feature discriminates against straight women? Join the discussion in the comments.
Johnson and Foster are represented by Alfred G. Rava of Rava Law Firm.
The Bumble dating app class action lawsuit is Christine Johnson, et al. v. Bumble Trading LLC, Case No. 5:24-cv-02148, in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Riverside.
Don’t Miss Out!
Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
Washington residents: Did you receive a ‘refer a friend’ text for Capital One, Venmo, Tesla, Coinbase, or another company?
September 23, 2025 | Legal News
50 thoughts onBumble class action claims dating app discriminates against straight women
I filled out a w9 and was approved for my claim but didn’t get my money and now I’m freaking out because I have to pay taxes on money I didn’t receive and I can’t reach anyone
Bumble is specifically designed like that as an alternative option. there are plenty of other apps you can use, most people end up on all of them anyway so you’ll be seeing the same people.
Im heterosexual and Bumble majes it harder to find a opposite sex. But easier if its the same sex partner. That’s discrimination. Im interested in the class action settlement. Please contact me.
The federal court in this case just issued an order denying Bumble’s motion to dismiss and ruling that, “Here, Plaintiffs’ alleged facts regarding Defendants’ business conduct are sufficient to state a claim under the Unruh Act. First, Plaintiffs allege Defendants denied Plaintiffs full and equal accommodations on the basis of their sex and sexual orientation by denying “heterosexual women” the ability to “simply match with a man and let him initiate contact . . . without doing anything more.” Comp. ¶ 18. “If a female [Bumble] user is heterosexual, Defendants require her to make the first move with male matches.” Id. ¶ 7. But, “if a female user matches with another woman, Defendants allow either female to initiate contact with the other woman.” Id. At this stage, these allegations are sufficient to establish Defendants denied Plaintiffs the same experience as other users based on their sex and sexual orientation.”
Please add me!
Yes it does discriminate and I have been a member for 6 years please include me