Subwayโs tuna sandwiches and wraps have absolutely no tuna in them, according to a $5 million class action lawsuit accusing the sandwich chain of fraud among other things.ย
The Californians who filed the Subway class action lawsuit say โthey were tricked into buying food items that wholly lacked the ingredient they reasonably thought they were purchasing.โย
The lawsuit was filed after independent testing found that Subwayโs tuna is a mixture of various concoctions that look similar to tuna, but in fact, is not tuna.ย
The actual ingredients of the concoctions were not revealed, but the plaintiffsโ lawyer hinted that it may not even be seafood that Subway is serving.
โWe found that the ingredients were not tuna and not fish,โ the attorney told The Washington Post.ย
Class Action Lawsuit: Subwayโs Tuna Sandwiches Contain No Actual Tuna
The Californians are accusing Subway of breaking several laws by negligently and intentionally misrepresenting its tuna sandwich to customers.ย
โDefendants have no reasonable basis for labeling, advertising, marketing and packaging the Products as being or containing โtuna,โโ the proposed class action lawsuit asserts. โAs a result, consumers are consistently misled into purchasing the Products for the commonly known and/or advertised benefits and characteristics of tuna when in fact no such benefits could be had, given that the Products are in fact devoid of tuna.โ
The plaintiffs are looking to represent a Class of other consumers in California who bought a tuna sandwich or wrap from Subway since 2017 thinking they were getting actual fish.ย
Subway is standing by its tuna sandwich asserting that its tuna is not only fish, but wild-caught fish, according to The Washington Post.ย
Subwayโs Sandwiches Taken Apart in Legal Actions Challenging its Authenticity
This is far from the first legal action challenging Subwayโs sandwiches. Just last year Irelandโs Supreme Court ruled that Subwayโs bread was not actually bread. Judges found that Subwayโs โbreadโ contained too much sugar to be legally called bread, according to NPR.ย
A spokesperson for the sandwich chain brushed off the ruling saying in part, โSubwayโs bread is, of course, bread. We have been baking fresh bread in our restaurants for more than three decades and our guests return each day for sandwiches made on bread that smells as good as it tastes,โ according to NPR.ย
Also in 2020, A Canadian judge authorized a class action lawsuit challenging Subwayโs chicken sandwiches. This came after a 2017 CBC marketplace article that reported a DNA analysis revealed the chicken in Subwayโs chicken sandwiches contained โ50% of chicken DNA, the rest being made up of soy.โ
The DNA analysis was reportedly performed by a researcher at a Trent University laboratory. Subway fired back with a defamation lawsuit against the CBC claiming its reporting was reckless and malicious. That part of the food fight ended with a judge ordering Subway to pay $500,000 in legal fees to CBC.ย
As for the proposed Subwayโs tuna sandwich class action lawsuit, the plaintiffโs attorneys believe that if itโs certified, it could include thousands of California Subway consumers.ย
Do you eat Subwayโs sandwiches or wraps? Have you tried Subwayโs tuna sandwich? Tell us your thoughts in the comment section below!ย
The plaintiffs are represented by Shalini Dogra of Dogra Law Group PC.ย
The Subwayโs Tuna Sandwich Class Action Lawsuit is Nilima Amin, et al., v. Subway Restaurants Inc., et al., Case No. 4:21-cv-00498-DMR, in the United States District Court Northern District of California.ย
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
1,717 thoughts onSubwayโs Tuna Sandwiches Contain No Actual Tuna, Class Action Lawsuit Asserts
I would like to be added to this case โ
Please add me
please add me!
Please add me
Add me
OMG absolutely never again. I love tuna sandwiches and have eaten there many times. Please add me.
Please add me.
Please add me
Weโve eaten hundreds of tuna sandwiches!! We thought! Please add me
Please add me.