Update:
- An Ohio federal judge ruled GM cannot arbitrate claims the automaker sold vehicles with defective engines allegedly engineered to fail.
- U.S. District Judge Charles E. Fleming cited recent guidance from the 6th Circuit, ruling GM’s actions were “inconsistent with reliance on any potential arbitration right (GM) may have.”
- Judge Fleming determined GM essentially agreed to waive its right to arbitrate the claims by waiting 20 months after receiving an arbitration agreement to file a motion to compel and then failing to explain the delay.
- GM also engaged in motion practice by opposing a class certification bid and attempting to toss the plaintiffs’ experts’ testimony and opinions, the judge says.
- Drivers argue GM sold certain vehicles equipped with defective oil systems that caused them to consume excessive oil, leading to engine damage.
(Nov. 30, 2020)
Drivers in a GM oil class action lawsuit say their Chevrolet Silverado vehicles consumed excessive amounts of oil due to a defective engine.
Plaintiffs Lisa Mae Jennings and Airko Inc. say their 2013 Chevrolet Silverado trucks suffered from excessive oil consumption due to a defect in their engines. The Generation IV Vortec 5300 engines found in these trucks allegedly contain a defect which causes the oil issues — in turn leading to engine damage.
Jennings says she experienced the GM oil defect in her 2013 Chevrolet Silverado vehicle, which she purchased new. Jennings allegedly noticed the oil consumption issue for the first time in 2016, while the vehicle was still under warranty.
Since then, Jennings has reportedly suffered from numerous problems with her engine that all link back to the oil problem.
Over the course of normal operation, Jennings has allegedly suffered from a broken camshaft, failed lifters and rough idle — all of which she contends are a result of the oil defect. Due to these problems, she has reportedly had to replace the camshaft, lifters and spark plugs in her vehicle.
Airko — an Ohio company — allegedly experienced a similar issue with its 2013 Chevrolet Silverado, which was purchased used in 2016.
Mechanics for the company claim to have informed leadership that their truck consumed an “unusually high” amount of oil. Later on, the vehicle’s engine reportedly failed completely. After further inspection, this failure was attributed to a loss of lubricity from low oil levels.
According to the plaintiffs, this issue does not affect only Chevrolet Silverado vehicles. The plaintiffs contend the Chevrolet Avalanche, Chevrolet Suburban, Chevrolet Tahoe, GMC Sierra, GMC Yukon and GMC Yukon XL vehicles all are affected. In fact, the class action lawsuit notes several online forums contain stories of similar GM oil consumption problems.
The GM oil defect allegedly stems from a problems with the piston rings in Generation IV Vortec 5300 engines. These rings allegedly fail to serve their intended purpose of keeping oil in the crankcase of the engine. As a result, oil allegedly migrates past the rings where it can burn or accumulate in the engine’s combustion surfaces.
“[T]he Class Vehicles were engineered to fail,” the GM oil class action lawsuit contends. “GM failed to disclose the truth about these vehicles and failed to remedy the well-established defects in the Class Vehicles that were on the road.”
The plaintiffs claim that GM knew or should have known about the defects in their vehicles’ engines but failed to take steps to remedy the issue or inform consumers.
As a result, consumers like the plaintiffs were reportedly deceived into purchasing the affected vehicles based on false promises and expectations.
The GM oil class action lawsuit contends this deception caused financial harm to consumers who paid more for the vehicles than they were worth.
The plaintiffs seek to represent a Class of Ohio drivers who purchases or leased a Chevrolet Silverado, Chevrolet Avalanche, Chevrolet Suburban, Chevrolet Tahoe, GMC Sierra, GMC Yukon and GMC Yukon XL vehicle. According to the GM oil class action lawsuit, there could be thousands of Class Members.
This is not the first time GM has faced a class action lawsuit over its alleged oil troubles.
In 2019, another plaintiff argued that he and other Chevrolet and GM vehicle owners were harmed by a defect in their engines which caused excessive oil consumption. However, that case was dismissed earlier this month by a federal judge in the Northern District of Ohio.
Although that case was dismissed, plaintiffs’ lawyers in the current case remain confident their claims will succeed in court based on the success of similar allegations.
Have you experienced GM oil issues in your vehicle? Share your experiences in the comment section below.
Plaintiffs and the proposed Class are represented by Mark A. DiCello, Justin J. Hawal, Adam J. Levitt, John E. Tangren and Daniel R. Ferri of DiCello Levitt Gutzler LLC; and W. Daniel “Dee” Miles III, H. Clay Barnett III and J. Mitch Williams of Beasley Allen Crow Methvin Portis & Miles PC.
The GM Oil Class Action Lawsuit is Airko Inc., et al. v. General Motors LLC, Case No. 1:20-cv-02638, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.
Don’t Miss Out!
Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
NEC lawsuit: Families take action against Enfamil and Similac baby formula makers
September 10, 2025 | Legal News
16 thoughts onJudge rules GM can’t arbitrate engine class action
I have a 2016 chevy equinox that consumes oil for than normal. I was recently told that due to the oil consumption it has messed up my tensioner and timing chain and they both have to be fixed ASAP before the timing chain locks up on me.
I lost oil presure in my 2011 yukon. Replaced oil presure sensor 3 times. Had in shop almost 6 months no i go through a quart ever3 days. Tonight it went into limp mode and its burning oil and barley drives possible inner engine damage. This started from the first week I bought it
I began having issues with my low oil light coming on before my 2019 Silverado 6.2L was do for oil changes. I had the oil pump changed last summer (which they had it over 6 weeks) Thet said it should have helped the consumption issue. They did a consumption test, and stated it was within Chevrolet parameters, I don’t trust that.
Update on a previous post with more details: I bought a 2012 Avalanche LTZ lin July 2021 in North Carolina, it had 136,000 miles on it, after owning it for 6 months the problems were constant, had to add oil to it about every other day, had to change oil every 1500-2000 miles, full synthetic supposedly 10,000 miles between oil change hight priced, GM specific oil which would turn thick and black 1500 -2,000 miles, even after having to add a quart about every 2-3 days, then it started smoking, found out there was antifreeze going into the combustion chamber, it had a plastic intake manifold gasket, I had that changed along with coils and injectors, cost of $1,200 still using lot of oil, then antifreeze in combustion chamber again, bought a remanufactured engine, remanufactured to original standards, cost of engine, install, and components $7,500 after 2 months started using oil again, then catalytic convertors became clogged, replaced entire exhaust cost $750 it was still going through oil, called company I bought remanufactured engine from they told me that because I decided to forego $500 core charge and keep my old engine my warranty was void, which I paid extra for a 5 year replacement warranty, then in July of 2024 I was driving it and the engine caught on fire 1$1,000 down payment + $500 per month truck payment for 3 years + $1,200 for intake manifold, coils, and injectors + $750 exhaust replacement + $7,500 engine replacement for total of 20,000 miles of use and constant oil adding and changes left me minimizing other basic essentials and a lot of trying to find a ride to store ect. In a very rural area where I live on q VA disability fixed income, and now behind on bills and house going into foreclosure all because I thought I was buying a decent truck with only 136,000 miles on it, at 172,000 a big ball of flames leaves me miles driving an old beater truck and losing my home. I am a part of an oil consumption lawsuit by NC, VS, and Idaho, which was awarded by a jury for 102 million, but GM is appealing, and I did not receive a notice about the class action lawsuit until after the Jury had already reached a verdict
I bought a 2012 Avalanche LTZ lin July 2021 in North Carolina, it had 136,000 miles on it, after owning it for 6 months the problems were constant, had to add oil to it about every other day, had to change oil every 1500-2000 miles, full synthetic supposedly 10,000 miles between oil change hight priced, GM specific oil which would turn thick and black 1500 -2,000 miles, even after having to add a quart about every 2-3 days, then it started smoking, found out there was antifreeze going into the combustion chamber, it had a plastic intake manifold gasket, I had that changed along with coils and injectors, cost of $1,200 still using lot of oil, then antifreeze in combustion chamber again, bought a remanufactured engine, remanufactured to original standards, cost of engine, install, and components $7,500 after 2 months started using oil again, then catalytic convertors became clogged, replaced entire exhaust cost $750 it was still going through oil, called company I bought remanufactured engine from they told me that because I decided to forego $500 core charge and keep my old engine my warranty was void, which I paid extra for a 5 year replacement warranty, then in July of 2024 I was driving it and the engine caught on fire 1$1,000 down payment + $500 per month truck payment for 3 years + $1,200 for intake manifold, coils, and injectors + $750 exhaust replacement + $7,500 engine replacement for total of 20,000 miles of use and constant oil adding and changes left me minimizing other basic essentials and a lot of trying to find a ride to store ect. In a very rural area where I live on q VA disability fixed income, and now behind on bills and house going into foreclosure all because I thought I was buying a decent truck with only 136,000 miles on it, at 172,000 a big ball of flames leaves me miles driving an old beater truck and losing my home. I am a part of an oil consumption lawsuit by NC, VS, and Idaho, which was awarded by a jury for 102 million, but GM is appealing, and I did not receive a notice about the class action lawsuit until after the Jury had already reached a verdict