Steven Cohen , Abraham Jewett  |  June 8, 2022

Category: Auto News

A mechanic checks a vehicle's engine oil - Fiat Chrysler allegedly sold vehicles with defective engines that consume too much oil -  class action - extended warranty

Update:

  • U.S. District Judge Judith E. Levy granted preliminary approval to a Fiat Chrysler class action settlement made to resolve claims it sold certain Jeep, Dodge, Chrysler, Ram and Fiat vehicles with an engine defect.
  • The plaintiffs claimed Fiat Chrysler sold vehicles with a design defect that caused their engines to burn off more oil than what would be normal. 
  • Fiat Chrysler agreed to provide cash reimbursements, extend vehicle warranties to seven years or 100,000 miles and supply no-cost software upgrades as part of the agreement. 
  • The settlement agreement will benefit a class of nearly 1.7 million drivers.
  • Drivers may be eligible to get $340 if they receive a service notification informing them they need an engine long block replacement, according to the settlement.

(May 5, 2020)

Fiat Chrysler has been hit with a class action lawsuit by Jeep owners who claim the company’s cars contain an engine defect that causes them to consume an excessive amount of oil.

Plaintiffs Amber Wood, Ashley Schuchart, Karen Burke and Danielle Oates say their Jeep vehicles, which are equipped with a 2.4L Tigershark MultiAir Engine II, consume too much oil, causing the oil pressure to drop dangerously low before recommended oil changes.

The plaintiffs claim the oil consumption defect can cause the vehicles can shut down during normal operation, which places the driver at risk of serious injury.

Wood, a citizen of Illinois, alleges she purchased a 2018 Jeep Compass from Bettenhausen Chrysler Dodge Jeep RAM in Tinley Park, Illinois. She claims her vehicle is equipped with a defective 2.4L Tigershark Multi Air engine and fails to function safely, as advertised.

Wood says that, before she purchased the Fiat Chrysler vehicle, she reviewed the window sticker that was placed on the vehicle which advertised the car’s various features. She claims that she relied on the advertisements contained on the window sticker when deciding to purchase the vehicle.

The plaintiff says since purchasing the car, she has experienced excessive oil consumption and oil indicator lights persistently in the vehicle. While driving her car to work and making a left turn, the Fiat Chrysler vehicle shut off and would not move, she says.

Wood states she was finally able to get the car to start; once she got home, she called the dealership where she purchased the car.

She brought the vehicle to the dealership and was told the vehicle was sucking down oil and needed a new motor, the Fiat Chrysler class action lawsuit alleges.

The dealership then replaced the engine, but Woods argues the oil indicator light recently came on even though it was only 2,000 miles since her last oil change.

“FCA never told Plaintiff about the Oil Consumption or Oil Indicator defects, so Plaintiff purchased her Affected Vehicle on the reasonable, but mistaken, belief that her Affected Vehicle would be reliable and safe and would retain all of its operating characteristics throughout its useful life,” the Fiat Chrysler class action lawsuit goes on to say.

Wood explains she purposefully shopped for a Fiat Chrysler Jeep vehicle because she believed the advertising that went along with the car meant they were safe and reliable.

She states none of the advertisements disclosed there was a defect in with the engine and that Fiat Chrysler would refuse to repair the defects.

Wood says in the Fiat Chrysler class action lawsuit that, if the company had disclosed that her vehicle had the oil consumption and oil indicator defects, she would not have purchased the vehicle or would have paid less for it.

Other plaintiffs in the Fiat Chrysler class action lawsuit allegedly experienced similar issues due to an underlying defect affecting all of their vehicles.

The FCA class action lawsuit points to a March 2019 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaint regarding a 2015 Jeep Cherokee which states that a dealership indicated that there is an oil consumption issue having to do with the pistons.

Another complaint to the NHTSA, lodged in 2020, states that an owner of a 2019 Jeep Cherokee required a new engine because the piston rings in the engine broke and scored the cylinder which led to the engine to consume too much oil.

“Because of the Oil Consumption defect, the Class Vehicles are prone to sudden and unexpected shut down, creating unsafe driving conditions when the vehicle stalls or shuts off without warning,” the Fiat Chrysler class action lawsuit argues.

The Fiat Chrysler class action lawsuit alleges that prior to 2013, consumers had complained that some of the vehicles in the class were not powered enough. In response, the larger yet defective 2.4L Tigershark MultiAir II Engine allegedly supplanted the older engines.

The Class vehicles that were equipped with the new defective engine are 2015-2016 Chrysler 200, 2013-2016 Dodge Dart, 2016-2020 Fiat 500X, 2017-2020 Fiat Toro, 2014-2020 Jeep Cherokee, 2017-2020 Jeep Compass, 2015-2020 Jeep Renegade and 2015-2020 Ram ProMaster City.

“Owners of these vehicles are terrified of sudden, unexpected engine stalls, and left empty-handed by FCA dealerships and technicians who continue to ignore this serious safety hazard,” counsel for the plaintiffs said in a statement.

“It’s only a matter of time before this defect leads to a fatality, with millions of affected vehicles sold by FCA on the road.”

Do you own one of the class vehicles and are having trouble with the engine? Leave a message in the comments section below.

The plaintiffs are represented by Steve W. Berman and Elaine T. Byszewski of Hagens, Berman, Sobol, & Shapiro; E. Powell Miller of the Miller Law Firm; and Jeffrey S. Goldenberg and Todd Naylor of Goldenberg Schneider LPA.

The Fiat Chrysler engine defect class action lawsuit is Amber Wood, et al. v. FCA US LLC, Case No. 2:20-cv-11054, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.


Don’t Miss Out!

Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!


Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

350 thoughts onFiat Chrysler class action over faulty engine claims settled with extended warranties

  1. Courtney Booth says:

    I have a 2016 Chrysler 200

  2. Shannon George says:

    I have a Jeep Cherokee 2018, I have stalled or just plain stopped over 4 times in the car, the only way i could get it to stop was get an oil change..I was lucky and was in places i was able to pull over. This has been a scary experience and i pray this gets resolved asap because the next time it happens I may not be so lucky…I notice i have a card in the mail today about the lawsuit I just hope i can reach out to someone to get this resolved sooner than later.

  3. Janise Gentry says:

    I have a 2018 Renegade and I am having all the issues everyone else is having. I was stuck out of state for a month while I waited on repairs. Add me to the list please.

  4. Samantha Price says:

    I have a 2018 Jeep renegade. The dealership “replaced” the faulty oil recall, however the Jeep still stalls and gives me issues. The warranty is expired and the dealership doesn’t seem to care that the issue is still persisting. Please add me to the law suit.

  5. Sean Maloney says:

    I have a 2016 limited that has issues, like most of the renegades. I keep a very close eye on the oil, and it has issues with starting whenever it feels like it.

    1. Sean Maloney says:

      Also I have the 2.4 tigershark

  6. aubree cloninger says:

    I have a 2018 Jeep renegade.
    It stalled in middle of highway. Then died. I had to get a tow due to the fact the engine messed up and caused something to burn.
    Cost me about $1500 or more to fix.
    Still have problems with car. Sometimes the radio blasts won’t shut off. Doors won’t lock. Backup camera works then don’t.
    Lights are blown all the time!

  7. Suzi Powers says:

    Add my email to this as well. I have a 2017 Jeep Renegade & the engine stalling has happened a few times already

  8. Richard Davis says:

    Add me to the lawsuit. I own a 2017 Jeep Cherokee sport with the same problem. We purchased the jeep in Later part of 2016, drove it home. A week later (less than a 1000 miles), my wife was diving it, made a right turn and the engine cut off. Took it to the dealership, and found it was 4 quarts low in oil with no indicator light. About every 200 miles, it was a quart low in oil. Spoke with several techs who stated to “just change the oil more often” or add an oil stabilizer. When the engine had 71000 miles while driving down the highway, the engine developed a severe miss. Took it to the local dealership who stated that the #2 cylinder wall was scored and the engine needed to be replaced. Asked if this was covered under the warranty, their answer was no because it was out of warranty. I was told by the tech that I could drive it as long as I did not “dog it”. I drove it until approx 114000 miles with a slight miss, now it is not driveable. It will not start due to the engine being bad and need replacement. Have spoken with the warranty department at Chrysler on 2 seperate occassions and have been told there is noting they can or will do to replace the defective engine.

  9. J. Roper says:

    I own a 2015 Jeep Renegade. After owning my car for 6 years with no problems I got up one afternoon to leave my house and the vehicle would not start and required a jump. Once I got the jump, I proceeded to the auto parts store and purchase a new battery. Once the battery was installed, the car started fine but then the vehicle would not go into drive. As a result, I had the vehicle towed to the Jeep Dealership.

    After keeping my vehicle for two weeks, and trying to diagnose the problem, I was notified yesterday that the problem resulted from the vehicle needing to have the modules reprogrammed and a low oil level. So I understand the possibility of reprogramming but the low oil level made no sense to me. As a result, I explained to the service coordinator that I regularly changed my oil as directed by my manual, and therefore, why would my oil level be lower than normal? The service coordinator merely stated he could not explain it, but that the low oil level contributed to the issue, and he recommend getting an oil change at this time. I agreed to have the work done, and was told the charges would be around $500+. Once they notify me that my vehicle is ready, I plan to challenge these charges, since reprogramming the modules is part of a recall and this low oil issue is a known defect.

    This is my first jeep purchase and after reading several complaints about the Renegades and other Chrysler vehicle, I am disappointed in my “American Made” purchase. I am appalled to realize that the manufacturer was aware of these oil issues yet failed to take responsibility. They chose money and profit over safety and human life! Please include me in this class action lawsuit.

  10. AvictimofDodge says:

    So happy to see the Class action unfolding now. These eggshells (dodge, Chrysler, etc.) gave me hell about this terrible deteriorating engines. Degenerative maintenance doesn’t apply to me because ive done my visits according to proper maintenance and once the check engine light illuminated i was back at the dealer. There concern was predatory towards the dreaded ticking, they all had this deadend mentality about if the vvt valve had debris you will need an engine for replacement my vehicle only has 45000 miles. How does one get away with selling bad engines period? Even if you replace the engine it will become repeatable process. FCA does not need to be on the market with this state of thinking.

1 19 20 21 22 23 31

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.