Amanda Antell  |  November 24, 2015

Category: Legal News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

morcellation-cancer-lawsuitA new power morcellator lawsuit has joined the growing pile of cases involving women who allege uterine cancer was spread by the devices.

This morcellation lawsuit was filed against a Philadelphia power morcellator manufacturer by a woman who, like most plaintiffs, had an undiagnosed uterine sarcoma that was not discovered until being ruptured by the power morcellator. The lawsuit says the morcellator was being used in the surgery to remove potentially benign tumors.

However, using the medical device, the PKS PlasmaSORD Bipolar Morcellator, allegedly caused the cancer cells to spread throughout her body. The woman had undergone a power morcellator surgical procedure in 2011, and was told it was a less invasive method to remove the cysts.

The lawsuit alleges that manufacturing company, Gyrus Acmi Lp., failed to mention this possible complication.

Overview of Power Morcellator Allegations

Over the years, power morcellators had become increasingly popular due to the devices being less invasive than traditional  surgery. These devices allow patients to go through less hospital recovery time, and often saves money on medical bills.

This is because power morcellators are able to use a precise, delicate incision in the abdominal surgical site, which is often much larger in traditional surgery. Once the incision is made, power morcellators are inserted through the surgical site, where the device slices up any abnormal tissue, such as uterine fibroids.

Attached to power morcellators are rotating blades, which cut up the tissue to be more easily extracted. The problem has been that the devices have been reportedly causing numerous women to suddenly develop cancer by spreading undiscovered uterine sarcoma.

There is no diagnostic method to detect uterine sarcoma before the surgery, putting many women at risk. Despite the risks, power morcellator manufacturing companies allegedly failed to disclose this possibility to patients or doctors.

Do YOU have a legal claim? Fill out the form on this page now for a free, immediate, and confidential case evaluation. The morcellation cancer attorneys who work with Top Class Actions will contact you if you qualify to let you know if an individual lawsuit or class action lawsuit is best for you. [In general, morcellator cancer lawsuits are filed individually by each plaintiff and are not class actions.] Hurry — statutes of limitations may apply.

Learn More

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


Get Help – It’s Free

Join a Free Morcellation Cancer Class Action Lawsuit Investigation

If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer in the uterus, pelvis or abdomen within two years of undergoing surgery for a myomectomy (removal of fibroids), hysterectomy (removal of the uterus), oophorectomy (removal of the ovaries), or salpingectomy (removal of fallopian tubes), you may have a legal claim. See if you qualify by filling out the short form below.

An attorney will contact you if you qualify to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you.

Oops! We could not locate your form.

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.