If you are experiencing some of the vaginal mesh side effects below, or if you already had your transvaginal mesh removed due to these complications, you may have a legal claim and could qualify for compensation:
- Pain during sex
- Urinary problems
- Multiple occurrences of pelvic organ prolapse
- Vaginal scarring
- Perforated bladder, perforated bowel or perforated blood vessels
- Mesh erosion into the vagina
- Organ injuries
Millions of dollars in compensation has already been awarded to victims of transvaginal mesh complications, and vaginal mesh settlements continue to be negotiated. Products involved in litigation include:
- AMS Elevate Prolapse Repair System
- AMS Apogee Vault Suspension System
- AMS Perigee System
- AMS Monarc Sling System
- AMS Sparc Sling System
- Bard Avaulta Support System
- Boston Scientific Pinnacle Pelvic Floor Repair Kit
- Boston Scientific Uphold Vaginal Support System
- Ethicon Gynecare Gynemesh
- Ethicon Gynecare Prolene Soft Mesh
- Ethicon Gynecare Prolift Pelvic Floor Repair System
- Ethicon Gynecare TVT Transvaginal Sling
- UGYTEX Dual Knit Mesh
- Coviden IVS Tunneler Sling
Women who have been implanted with these vaginal slings or transvaginal mesh implants may have a legal claim to pursue compensation for medical bills, pain and suffering, and more. Fill out the form on this page now for a free legal review. But hurry — statutes of limitations apply!
Vaginal Mesh Complications Injure Thousands
Thousands of vaginal mesh lawsuits have been filed by women have had a transvaginal mesh implant, vaginal sling, bladder sling or vaginal mesh surgically implanted to treat pelvic organ prolapse. Now, these women are reporting a multitude of serious side effects caused by the very medical devices that were supposed to help them.
Vaginal mesh patients have reported urinary problems; vaginal scarring; pain during sex; multiple occurrences of pelvic organ prolapse; mesh erosion into the vagina; organ injuries; perforations within the bladder, bowel and blood vessels; and vaginal or bladder infections. You may be eligible to seek compensation for your medical expenses, time away from work, pain and suffering.
Transvaginal mesh systems were marketed by medical device manufacturers as a way to treat pelvic organ prolapse and now thousands of women are reporting pain and severe internal injuries because of the transvaginal mesh or bladder sling. Transvaginal mesh and bladder slings have now been shown to cause a host of complications and serious problems. In fact, many transvaginal mesh attorneys are now claiming that there is no evidence that transvaginal insertion of a bladder sling has no benefit for women when its primary use is treating pelvic organ prolapse.
Transvaginal mesh and bladder sling attorneys are actively filing lawsuits in attempts to get women compensated for surgeries to remove the mesh or sling, time away from work, mental strife, and pain and suffering. Submit your information using the form on this page now for a free legal review. If you qualify, a vaginal mesh attorney will contact you for a free, no-obligation consultation regarding your case.
Thousands of Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Filed — Settlements Offered
Dozens of vaginal mesh and bladder sling lawsuits have been filed in the past two years as concern grows and more women report serious internal injuries due to the mesh. In fact, more transvaginal mesh lawsuits are expected.
Leading manufacturers of vaginal mesh and bladder slings like Bard, AMS, Ethicon, Boston Scientific, UGYTEX, Coviden, and others are preparing to settle these vaginal mesh lawsuits as more studies come out showing the dangers and side effects of vaginal mesh and bladder slings. Millions of dollars in vaginal mesh settlements have already been awarded to plaintiffs.
Vaginal mesh settlements could result in thousands of dollars, if not hundreds of thousands of dollars, in compensation to help pay for medical expenses, missed work, pain and suffering, and more.
Families who lost a loved one due to infection or organ injuries may be eligible to file a wrongful death lawsuit and payments from vaginal mesh wrongful death lawsuits could amount to millions of dollars. In addition, spouses of those afflicted with defective vaginal mesh or bladder slings may be able to sue for “loss of consortium,” which roughly translates into the loss of intimacy with their spouse due to the side effects of transvaginal mesh. Recently, lawsuits had spouses of transvaginal mesh and bladder sling victims listed as co-plaintiffs which may increase the award or settlement if they win their case.
If you or a loved one were injured by transvaginal mesh and/or had revision surgery to repair damage caused by a vaginal sling, you may have a legal claim. Get help now by filling out the form on this page for a FREE case evaluation!
Get Help – It’s Free
Join a Free Transvaginal Mesh Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
If you qualify, an attorney will contact you to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you.
Please Note: If you want to participate in this investigation, it is imperative that you reply to the law firm if they call or email you. Failing to do so may result in you not getting signed up as a client, if you potentially qualify, or getting you dropped as a client.
In general, transvaginal mesh lawsuits are filed individually by each plaintiff and are not class actions. After you fill out the form, the attorneys who work with Top Class Actions will contact you if you qualify to let you know if an individual lawsuit or class action lawsuit is best for you.
The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
E-mail any problems with this form to Staff@TopClassActions.com
Counsel responsible for this advertisement include Robert Arentz at:
Arentz Law Group, PC
PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT: THIS WEB PAGE IS AN ADVERTISEMENT AND THE PARTICIPATING ATTORNEY(S) ARE INCLUDED BECAUSE THEY PAY AN ADVERTISING FEE. It is not a lawyer referral service or prepaid legal services plan. Top Class Actions is not a law firm. Top Class Actions does not endorse or recommend any lawyer or law firm who participates in the network, nor does it analyze a person’s legal situation when determining which participating lawyers receive a person’s inquiry. It does not make any representation and has not made any judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating lawyer. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The information contained herein is not legal advice. Any information you submit to Top Class Actions does not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be protected by attorney-client privilege. Do not use the form to submit confidential, time-sensitive, or privileged information. All photos are of models and do not depict clients. All case evaluations are performed by participating attorneys.